12.07.2015 Views

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ased on time or other stocks) to ‘fill in’ the <strong>data</strong>set <strong>and</strong> therefore reduce the number of<strong>data</strong> points that had to be dropped from the analysis. In the end this strategy was rejectedbecause <strong>data</strong> sets with only small gaps only resulted in a small loss of <strong>data</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>data</strong> setswith larger gaps (often at the beginning or end of the <strong>data</strong> set) were not able to be ‘filled in’with confidence. We have re-written the description of how we h<strong>and</strong>led ‘missing <strong>data</strong>’ in4.7 as well as in Appendix 3.26. Page 78 - The table suggested above should define what is meant by "Threeadditional models were tested with the model set...", the "all marine model", <strong>and</strong> otherequally vague terms.Response: This section has been completely rewritten. Please refer to the response for #24.27. Section 4.7.3 on pp. 79-80 - A summary table is also necessary here.Response: This section has been completely rewritten. Please refer to the response for #24.28. Page 81 - In the last two paragraphs prior to section 4.8, you bring in pink <strong>salmon</strong><strong>data</strong> without describing what types of mechanisms the PSC workshop concluded wereplausible. Here the reader will have no idea whether you are talking about competitionor predation by pinks. The last sentence prior to section 4.8 talks only in vague termsabout the mechanism; it must be more explicit.Response: We have revised this paragraph, providing more details on the hypothesesevaluated in the PSC report.29. Page 86 - what do you mean by "<strong>data</strong>base assimilation"?Response: We have rewritten this line to clarify the intended meaning, that collected <strong>data</strong>would be assimilated into a central, integrated <strong>data</strong>base.30. Page 87 - An intriguing, but to me, impractical suggestion is made here: "... continueexisting topic-specific <strong>data</strong>bases (e.g., climate <strong>data</strong>, ocean conditions, stockinformation, contaminants, habitat <strong>data</strong>, disease), each maintained by the entities thathave collected these <strong>data</strong>, but link key fields of each one to an integrated,interdisciplinary, geo-referenced <strong>data</strong>base." The footnote to this idea notes that theTrinity <strong>River</strong> Restoration Project is moving in this direction. It would be worth exp<strong>and</strong>ingupon that example here to demonstrate that the suggestion made by the authors in thequote above is achievable.Response: We have exp<strong>and</strong>ed our description <strong>and</strong> included some discussion of thechallenges involved with integrated but regionally distributed <strong>data</strong>bases.31. Page 90 - Insert "Strait of Juan de Fuca" next to the other bodies of the oceanmentioned in section 4.4 of the table because this is the strait apparently used by129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!