- Page 1:
April 2011technical report 6Fraser
- Page 7 and 8:
Stage 2: Smolt OutmigrationWe analy
- Page 9 and 10:
of multiple stressors and factors,
- Page 11 and 12:
4.3.5 Other evidence ..............
- Page 13 and 14:
List of TablesTable 4.2-1. Evaluati
- Page 16 and 17:
List of FiguresFigure 2.3-1. Cumula
- Page 18 and 19:
these integrative frameworks, conve
- Page 21 and 22:
2.0 Cumulative Impacts or Effects2.
- Page 23 and 24:
assumed that there is no potential
- Page 25 and 26:
classes of stressors. However, if s
- Page 27:
affected by many stressors over its
- Page 30 and 31:
examples illustrate this problem --
- Page 32 and 33:
possibly even negligible component
- Page 34 and 35:
Figure 3.3-1. The conceptual model
- Page 36 and 37:
3.3.3 Life history perspective/appr
- Page 38 and 39:
additional analyses to gain further
- Page 40 and 41:
Figure 3.3-3. Flow diagram used to
- Page 42 and 43:
This project is unusual in its scop
- Page 45 and 46:
4.0 Results, Synthesis and Discussi
- Page 47 and 48:
Peterman and Dorner (2011) have thr
- Page 49 and 50:
Figure 4.1-3. Estimates of long ter
- Page 51 and 52:
Figure 4.1-5. A) Total run size of
- Page 53 and 54:
Figure 4.1-6. Aggregate returns to
- Page 55 and 56:
o were generally worse during the l
- Page 57 and 58:
Freshwater predators on juvenile so
- Page 59 and 60:
copper, iron, mercury and silver).
- Page 61 and 62:
Several analyses by MacDonald et al
- Page 63 and 64:
abundances (Sproat, Klukshu, Chilka
- Page 65 and 66:
feel reasonably confident in this c
- Page 67 and 68:
Nelitz et al. (2011; Table 18) foun
- Page 69 and 70:
in the Lower Fraser than other Fras
- Page 71 and 72:
stressors. Thus our conclusions hav
- Page 73 and 74:
There are many marine predators tha
- Page 75 and 76:
assumption that exposure occurs whe
- Page 77 and 78:
observations that are then averaged
- Page 79 and 80:
Johannes et al. (2011) demonstrate
- Page 81 and 82:
“likely” contributor to the ove
- Page 83 and 84:
Table 4.4-2. Model specifications f
- Page 85 and 86: Region Variable M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M
- Page 87 and 88: 3. survival rates within key portio
- Page 89 and 90: 2011). The thermal limit hypothesis
- Page 91 and 92: Historically, the majority of retur
- Page 93 and 94: salinity. There is much evidence th
- Page 95 and 96: declines (discussed in section 4.2
- Page 97 and 98: There is indisputable evidence of t
- Page 99 and 100: Figure 4.6-2. Number of years that
- Page 101 and 102: correlation was statistically signi
- Page 103 and 104: 4.6.7 Key things we need to know be
- Page 105 and 106: al (2010). The combined effect of a
- Page 107 and 108: more likely to suffer en-route and
- Page 109 and 110: Table 4.7-2. Variables included in
- Page 111 and 112: However, an important limitation is
- Page 113 and 114: Alternative PreyVariablesModelsM1 M
- Page 115 and 116: will likely have a high correlation
- Page 117 and 118: 5.0 Conclusion5.1 Important Contrib
- Page 119 and 120: Stage 5: Migration back to SpawnWhi
- Page 121 and 122: More specifically, the extended res
- Page 123 and 124: The twelve highest priority recomme
- Page 125 and 126: Life stagefor FraserRiversockeyesal
- Page 127 and 128: 6.0 ReferencesAinsworth, L.M., Rout
- Page 129 and 130: Johannes, M.R.S., R. Hoogendoorn, R
- Page 131: Schaller et al. 2007. Comparative S
- Page 134 and 135: utilized to clarify the full range
- Page 138 and 139: presented in Appendix 3.d. Unfortun
- Page 140 and 141: now needs a thorough copy editing t
- Page 142 and 143: 12-31% of the diet. The evidence pr
- Page 144 and 145: efore submitting the draft report.
- Page 146 and 147: juvenile Harrison River sockeye.Res
- Page 148 and 149: series, B-series, etc. to clarify t
- Page 150 and 151: Response: This is a fair question.
- Page 152 and 153: each model.61. Add "C4a" to the sen
- Page 154 and 155: the conceptual model?Response: Our
- Page 156 and 157: Response: As discussed above, we di
- Page 158 and 159: hatchery pinks on sockeye. Consiste
- Page 160 and 161: sudden worsening in 2007…" should
- Page 162 and 163: annual data points can be interpola
- Page 164 and 165: Response: We have kept these two pa
- Page 166 and 167: 5. What information, if any, should
- Page 168 and 169: c. I anticipate that a collection o
- Page 170 and 171: without merit, I would not give the
- Page 172 and 173: Report Title: 6. Data Synthesis and
- Page 174 and 175: Response: We have added such a disc
- Page 176 and 177: (2011).This confusion continues wit
- Page 178 and 179: predation)…” Well, to say that
- Page 181 and 182: Appendix 3. Data and MethodsA3.1 Ap
- Page 183 and 184: A3.2.2 Qualitative assessment data
- Page 185 and 186: ProjectNumber Project Name Variable
- Page 187 and 188:
8888888888ProjectNumber Project Nam
- Page 189 and 190:
ProjectNumber Project Name Variable
- Page 191 and 192:
Each data product received from the
- Page 193 and 194:
Table A3.4-4. Summary of the life h
- Page 195 and 196:
Figure A3.4-3. Querying data to pre
- Page 197 and 198:
An example of final output data fro
- Page 199 and 200:
ProjectNumberProject Variable Subse
- Page 201 and 202:
ProjectNumberProject Variable Subse
- Page 203 and 204:
ProjectNumberProject Variable Subse
- Page 205 and 206:
ProjectNumberProject Variable Subse
- Page 207 and 208:
ProjectNumber1212121212121212121212
- Page 209 and 210:
ProjectNumber1212121212121212121212
- Page 211 and 212:
A3.5 Data AnalysisA3.5.1 Qualitativ
- Page 213 and 214:
1. The adverse ecological impact ha
- Page 215 and 216:
7. Removal:“Has the removal of th
- Page 217 and 218:
Conceptual modelIn the U.S. Council
- Page 219 and 220:
Table A3.5-1. Complete summary of a
- Page 221 and 222:
egression model: β β xt + β ( x
- Page 223 and 224:
Figure A3.5-2. This is an example o
- Page 225 and 226:
as likely to be important by each o
- Page 227 and 228:
ocean during a particular month). W
- Page 229 and 230:
observations were given a value of
- Page 231 and 232:
Table A3.5-3. Summary of appropriat
- Page 233 and 234:
Table A3.5-4. Description of the 6
- Page 235 and 236:
(Equation A3.5-3) provided a better
- Page 237 and 238:
Model selectionWe use the Burnham a
- Page 239 and 240:
Limitationso We only considered the
- Page 241 and 242:
Bayesian belief networks (BBN)BBNs
- Page 243 and 244:
(Fennell), which is equivalent to a
- Page 245 and 246:
Figure A4.2-2. Stock composition, s
- Page 247 and 248:
Figure A4.2-4. Stock composition fo
- Page 249 and 250:
Figure A4.2-6. Stock composition fo
- Page 251 and 252:
Table A4.3-2. Description of the ac
- Page 253 and 254:
A4.3.2Model: A4cBrood years: 1969-2
- Page 255 and 256:
Table A4.3-5. Estimates for all fix
- Page 257 and 258:
Model: A4bBrood years: 1969-2001A s
- Page 259 and 260:
ModelSet_A4b_VarName M1 M2 M3 M4 M5
- Page 261 and 262:
M8 No stressor variables added. 0 1
- Page 263 and 264:
ModelSet_B4c_VarName M1 M2 M3 M4 M5
- Page 265 and 266:
Table A4.3-11. B4b candidate models
- Page 267 and 268:
ModelSet_B4b_VarName M1 M2 M3 M4 M5
- Page 269 and 270:
Table A4.3-14. C4a candidate models
- Page 271 and 272:
Model: C3a1980-2004A model set was
- Page 273 and 274:
Table A4.3-18. Estimates for all fi
- Page 275 and 276:
Table A4.3-20. QCS C1a candidate mo
- Page 277 and 278:
Table A4.3-22. Model specifications
- Page 279:
Table A4.3-24. Estimates for all fi
- Page 282 and 283:
Overview of Required Input DataInte
- Page 284 and 285:
This assessment should be the contr
- Page 286 and 287:
Estimation detailsObservation typeC
- Page 288 and 289:
Given the above definitions, you sh
- Page 290 and 291:
Technical and Scientific Research P
- Page 292 and 293:
BackgroundIn response to the declin
- Page 294 and 295:
aw data, the range of error around
- Page 296 and 297:
government documents and interviews
- Page 298 and 299:
for all CUs should not rule out usi
- Page 300 and 301:
Key issues raised by workshop parti
- Page 302 and 303:
Quantitative analysis will use inte
- Page 304 and 305:
o Changes inside Strait of Georgia
- Page 307 and 308:
ReferencesFaber-Langendoen, D., L.
- Page 309 and 310:
Appendix B: Workshop AgendaTechnica
- Page 311 and 312:
Workshop AgendaNovember 30 th , 201
- Page 313 and 314:
3:00 pm Break [15 minutes]• Exami
- Page 315 and 316:
Cohen Commission welcome and introd
- Page 317 and 318:
Challenges and OpportunitiesDave Ma
- Page 319 and 320:
Conclusion #1: Most other BC and La
- Page 321 and 322:
Peterman: That was done and it does
- Page 323 and 324:
Data needs, uncertainty and availab
- Page 325 and 326:
estimates, escapement enumeration,
- Page 327 and 328:
English: That’s certainly the cas
- Page 329 and 330:
Christensen: We keep hearing about
- Page 331 and 332:
wild salmonids, but it is highly le
- Page 333 and 334:
Kent: (…?) parasite mortality in
- Page 335 and 336:
A detailed hazard evaluation, which
- Page 337 and 338:
Urbanization upstream of Hope since
- Page 339 and 340:
coast. That winter featured wetter
- Page 341 and 342:
change was in 1989, but there was n
- Page 343 and 344:
Research program presentations (con
- Page 345 and 346:
qualitative), abundance of potentia
- Page 347 and 348:
Christensen: Bristol Bay stocks are
- Page 349 and 350:
Comments are welcomed on the indica
- Page 351 and 352:
Key metrics: The most important met
- Page 353 and 354:
degrees C per decade, but that tren
- Page 355 and 356:
subject less fit to deal with major
- Page 357 and 358:
Peterman: Before you conclude from
- Page 359 and 360:
McKinnell: There are no marine surv
- Page 361 and 362:
List of ParticipantsDave Marmorek,
- Page 363:
CohenCommissionProjectChange 1 (enr