12.07.2015 Views

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix 2. Reviewer Evaluations <strong>and</strong> ResponsesReviewers:1. R<strong>and</strong>all M. Peterman2. Sean Cox3. Rick Routledge4. John ReynoldsThe authors’ responses to each reviewer’s comments are provided in bold below.Report Title: <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> Sockeye Salmon: Data Synthesis <strong>and</strong> Cumulative Impacts(draft final report)Reviewer Name: R<strong>and</strong>all M. PetermanDate: 12 March 20111. Identify the strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses of this report.Strengths:a. Most of this report is extremely well written. The hierarchical organization of thematerial is a very effective way for readers with different levels of underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> situation to easily access the report to the desired depth. For the mostpart, tables <strong>and</strong> figures are clear <strong>and</strong> useful.b. In recognition of the variety of backgrounds among readers, sections 2 <strong>and</strong> 3 do anexcellent job of setting out the context <strong>and</strong> limitations for this type of work, as well asexplaining the process for drawing conclusions. I particularly like Fig. 3.3-3 on page 19as a way of succinctly showing how the categories of relative likelihood were assignedto hypothesized mechanisms. The report also nicely differentiates between explanationsof past observations <strong>and</strong> making forecasts of the future.Weaknesses:c. There are two short sections in them main text that are poorly written (pages 58-59<strong>and</strong> 77-79). Those are sections that deal with the authors' own analyses of <strong>data</strong> (asopposed to the summaries of other researchers' analyses that are covered in the rest ofthe report).Response: These two sections have been re-organized <strong>and</strong> rewritten to address both thisissue <strong>and</strong> the more specific criticisms raised below. In particular, a new section (Section3.3.6) has been added to ensure that an appropriate overview of the quantitative methods isprovided prior to any discussion of the results of those analyses. This section is intended toprovide a concise, non-technical description of the quantitative methods such that bothnon-technical <strong>and</strong> technical readers will be able to clearly underst<strong>and</strong> the basicterminology <strong>and</strong> overall methods used without needing to refer to the technical details121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!