12.07.2015 Views

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

c. I anticipate that a collection of factors whose <strong>impacts</strong> were felt through acombination of time lags on non-additive <strong>and</strong> nonlinear stress <strong>impacts</strong>would be very hard, if not impossible, to detect with this sort of multipleregression analysis – especially when so little is known about some keyfactors like pathogens.Response: These are all excellent points. We had only limited time to conduct statisticalanalyses, <strong>and</strong> so we chose the simplest approaches. In Appendix 3 <strong>and</strong> a new section in themain report (3.3.6), we acknowledge the weaknesses <strong>and</strong> limitations of our approaches. Webelieve that the <strong>data</strong> limitations (i.e., appropriate covariates reflecting the impact pathwaysof concern; sufficient levels of contrast) are at least as serious a problem as the analyticalproblems.To address specific components of the reviewer’s comments:a) In Section 4.7, we discuss potential <strong>cumulative</strong> effects over the entire life cycle,though we also note the difficulty of determining the form (e.g. additive or nonadditive),magnitude, location <strong>and</strong> timing of such effects. We have also addedfurther discussion on the potential for other functional forms for the c<strong>and</strong>idatemodels (i.e. non-linear covariates, interactions) in our descriptions of the methods.The description <strong>and</strong> rationale for the approach we used with the change-pointanalyses has also been exp<strong>and</strong>ed.b) We have discussed functional regression analysis in Appendix 3 as a potentialtechnique to be used in the future.c) We agree.3. These inherent weaknesses notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing, I believe that the authors usedgood judgment in applying these techniques. In particular, I support their use ofscientific knowledge <strong>and</strong> common sense in limiting the c<strong>and</strong>idate factors for themultiple regression models.4. I would encourage the authors to provide examples of instances in which the sortof approach taken here would not have brought fundamental, underlying causesto light. For example, it seems unlikely that a multiple regression analysis withoutappropriate time lags could have drawn anyone’s attention to the keyphenomenon of bioaccumulation in the early days of research on ecological<strong>impacts</strong> of DDT.Response: This is a good example, which we will incorporate into our discussion of thelimitations of our analyses (in Appendix 3). Other mechanisms which could cause linearregressions to miss important ecosystem linkages include non-linear relationships betweenecosystem productivity, <strong>sockeye</strong> abundance <strong>and</strong> predation (Christensen <strong>and</strong> Trites 2011,pgs. 13, 76), as well as non-linear threshold effects from contaminants (MacDonald et al.2011).152

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!