12.07.2015 Views

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.0 Complexity, Caveats, <strong>and</strong> Overall Approach,3.1 Complexity of the Ecological SystemOver the 4 to 5 years of their life cycle, <strong>salmon</strong> encounter largely unmonitored variations inphysical <strong>and</strong> chemical conditions, food, competitors, predators, <strong>and</strong> disease, over severalthous<strong>and</strong> kilometres from high in the <strong>Fraser</strong> Basin to the Gulf of Alaska, with <strong>cumulative</strong> <strong>and</strong>interactive effects (most unknown), occurring over multiple life history stages in ways that varyfrom year to year. Gaps exist not only in <strong>data</strong> (limited time series <strong>and</strong> spatial coverage for manyfactors), but also in fundamental underst<strong>and</strong>ing. Under these circumstances, it is extremelydifficult for fisheries managers to accurately predict the expected returns of different <strong>salmon</strong>stocks in advance of their arrival. Indeed, pre-season predictions of <strong>sockeye</strong> returns are notreliable for 7 of 18 <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> stocks (English et al. 2011; Executive Summary). Previouswork (Walters <strong>and</strong> Collie 1988, Walters 1989, Myers 1998) has emphasized the difficulties ofpredicting recruitment of fish populations for the purposes of fisheries management, includingthe lack of persistence of environment-recruitment correlations.Rocket science is commonly used as a benchmark when describing the relative difficulty of othersubjects (e.g., “It isn’t rocket science.”). Fisheries science also isn’t rocket science, but it isnonetheless very challenging. Rocket scientists rely on repeatable laws of physics, whereasecological interactions are much more variable over time <strong>and</strong> space, <strong>and</strong> much less understood. Ifa rocket scientist had equivalent challenges to a fisheries scientist, s/he would be launching <strong>and</strong>l<strong>and</strong>ing rockets with all the key variables determining outcomes (gravity, atmospheric pressure,temperature, solar radiation, fuel quality, cosmic rays) radically changing from year to year <strong>and</strong>place to place, with little ability to monitor this variation, <strong>and</strong> considerable uncertainty about thebasic theory behind each of these variables <strong>and</strong> their interactions.Given the above uncertainties, attributing causes to observed effects is very difficult. Peterman<strong>and</strong> Dorner (2011, pg. 13-14) express this challenge well:An important concept for readers to keep in mind when considering the evidencepresented in this <strong>and</strong> other scientific reports to the Cohen Commission is that ecologicalsystems are dynamic <strong>and</strong> constantly change across time <strong>and</strong> space. They are composed ofcomplex sets of components that interact to generate responses to concurrently operatingdisturbances arising from both natural processes (e.g., ocean conditions) <strong>and</strong> humanactivities (e.g., fish farming). Because of such simultaneously occurring natural <strong>and</strong>human processes, it can be very difficult to attribute single dominant causes to observedecological changes, <strong>and</strong> while it is important to investigate each potential causeindividually, it is important to be aware that it might have been the interaction of severalfactors, rather than one factor per se, that caused the changes. Two well-known case13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!