12.07.2015 Views

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

exclude covariates with limited years of <strong>data</strong> (i.e. limit the model to only salinity <strong>and</strong> sacrificethe extra covariate, but extend it back to 1950). Choosing any particular set of covariates forcesyou to truncate longer time series to the length of the shortest <strong>data</strong> set. Choosing any particulartime period forces you to limit your analyses to those covariates with period of record that issufficiently long. We chose to evaluate different time-periods independently because each timeperiod presents a different trade-off between the length of the <strong>data</strong> <strong>and</strong> the number of covariatesthat can be included. Within each time-period we generated different model sets. A model setrepresents a set of covariates that have complete <strong>data</strong> over a specified period of time. Withineach model set, different models (i.e. combinations of variables) can be tested to determine theirability to explain the observed variability in the dependent variable, <strong>sockeye</strong> productivity in thiscase. Expressed another way, a ‘model set’ is simply a suite of c<strong>and</strong>idate models within a giventime-period that are organized to address a particular question. For example, one question ofinterest is whether factors affecting a particular life stage are more important than others. Mostprojects or papers only consider a single ‘model set’ by this definition. However, the large butincomplete <strong>data</strong> set combined with the range of questions this project attempts to addressrequired this additional layer.Key points:• Models may differ in the number <strong>and</strong> type of covariates, linear vs. non-linear terms, <strong>and</strong>the presence of interaction terms.• Many models are possible, but we should only test models that have biologically justifiedhypotheses.• In order to compare the relative performance of different models using Akaike’sInformation Criterion (AIC c ), models should be fit using the same <strong>data</strong>.• Comparison of AIC c scores does not tell us the best model possible, but rather helps us tounderst<strong>and</strong> the relative support for models we have estimated.• You need more <strong>data</strong> (n) than parameters (k) in order to be able to estimate theparameters. In addition, if the ratio (n/k) < 40, small sample size corrections should beemployed in the assessment of model fit (Burnham <strong>and</strong> Anderson (p76), 1998).Data reductionWe had hoped there would not be substantial correlation among metrics from a single contractor– one of the criteria specified was that the <strong>data</strong> metrics submitted should be independent.However, we found that in many cases we received several correlated <strong>data</strong> sets (e.g., sea surfacesalinities for 5 months). We first dropped any variable by life stage combinations where therewas not a reasonable hypothesis of a potential impact (e.g., we know that smolts are not in the210

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!