- Page 1: April 2011technical report 6Fraser
- Page 8 and 9: Stage 4: Growth in North Pacific an
- Page 10 and 11: Table of Contents1.0 Introduction..
- Page 12 and 13: Stage 4: Growth in North Pacific an
- Page 14: Table 4.8-1. Other factors potentia
- Page 17 and 18: 1.0 Introduction1.1 Project Objecti
- Page 19: Section 4.0: Results, Synthesis and
- Page 22 and 23: stressors interact or combine to af
- Page 24 and 25: 2.3 Present Cumulative Effects Anal
- Page 26 and 27: Cumulative Stress (arbitrary units)
- Page 29 and 30: 3.0 Complexity, Caveats, and Overal
- Page 31 and 32: also needs an underlying mechanism
- Page 33 and 34: 3. provide the Cohen Commission wit
- Page 35 and 36: Figure 3.3-2. Life history of Frase
- Page 37 and 38: The two key objectives defining our
- Page 39 and 40: River sockeye salmon but also, wher
- Page 41 and 42: Multiple regression can be used to
- Page 43: Key points:• Models may differ in
- Page 46 and 47: Peterman and Dorner (2011) analyzed
- Page 48 and 49: sockeye stocks tended to coincide w
- Page 50 and 51: Figure 4.1-4. Estimates of long ter
- Page 52 and 53:
of the 15 stocks with declining pro
- Page 54 and 55:
Implications of Observed Patterns i
- Page 56 and 57:
supply or water temperature. Unless
- Page 58 and 59:
4.2.2 Exposure of Fraser River sock
- Page 60 and 61:
did not correlate well with differe
- Page 62 and 63:
data are insufficient to perform an
- Page 64 and 65:
4.2.6 ConclusionsTable 4.2-1 follow
- Page 66 and 67:
4. better integration of existing a
- Page 68 and 69:
correlated to other factors reflect
- Page 70 and 71:
Table 4.3-1. Evaluation of the rela
- Page 72 and 73:
conditions (including marine condit
- Page 74 and 75:
changes in Fraser sockeye stock pro
- Page 76 and 77:
more important question is: what is
- Page 78 and 79:
coastal migration. Anomalous climat
- Page 80 and 81:
summarize the following evidence of
- Page 82 and 83:
Table 4.4-1. Variables used in the
- Page 84 and 85:
SoG. This may be due to regional di
- Page 86 and 87:
Table 4.4-6. Evaluation of the rela
- Page 88 and 89:
general, the potential mechanisms i
- Page 90 and 91:
2010) and the Strait of Georgia has
- Page 92 and 93:
the mechanisms responsible, may hel
- Page 94 and 95:
would provide evidence supporting t
- Page 96 and 97:
4. increased data on biological oce
- Page 98 and 99:
thermal optimum, with longer exposu
- Page 100 and 101:
and therefore the total recruits in
- Page 102 and 103:
dependence is unlikely to have been
- Page 104 and 105:
how effects at different life histo
- Page 106 and 107:
Table 4.7-1. Evaluation of the rela
- Page 108 and 109:
migration, and spawning. Three addi
- Page 110 and 111:
VariablesModelsM1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7
- Page 112 and 113:
Table 4.7-3. Variables included in
- Page 114 and 115:
The results show that the global mo
- Page 116 and 117:
Table 4.8-1. Other factors potentia
- Page 118 and 119:
developed Lower Fraser region. Seco
- Page 120 and 121:
The participants agreed with the PS
- Page 122 and 123:
databases (e.g., corrections to pas
- Page 124 and 125:
Table 5.2-1. Recommended research a
- Page 126 and 127:
Life stagefor FraserRiversockeyesal
- Page 128 and 129:
Draper, N.R. and H. Smith. 1998. Ap
- Page 130 and 131:
Naughton, G.P., C.C. Caudill, M.L.
- Page 133 and 134:
Appendix 1. Statement of WorkCohen
- Page 135:
will be explored using a multiple r
- Page 138 and 139:
presented in Appendix 3.d. Unfortun
- Page 140 and 141:
now needs a thorough copy editing t
- Page 142 and 143:
12-31% of the diet. The evidence pr
- Page 144 and 145:
efore submitting the draft report.
- Page 146 and 147:
juvenile Harrison River sockeye.Res
- Page 148 and 149:
series, B-series, etc. to clarify t
- Page 150 and 151:
Response: This is a fair question.
- Page 152 and 153:
each model.61. Add "C4a" to the sen
- Page 154 and 155:
the conceptual model?Response: Our
- Page 156 and 157:
Response: As discussed above, we di
- Page 158 and 159:
hatchery pinks on sockeye. Consiste
- Page 160 and 161:
sudden worsening in 2007…" should
- Page 162 and 163:
annual data points can be interpola
- Page 164 and 165:
Response: We have kept these two pa
- Page 166 and 167:
5. What information, if any, should
- Page 168 and 169:
c. I anticipate that a collection o
- Page 170 and 171:
without merit, I would not give the
- Page 172 and 173:
Report Title: 6. Data Synthesis and
- Page 174 and 175:
Response: We have added such a disc
- Page 176 and 177:
(2011).This confusion continues wit
- Page 178 and 179:
predation)…” Well, to say that
- Page 181 and 182:
Appendix 3. Data and MethodsA3.1 Ap
- Page 183 and 184:
A3.2.2 Qualitative assessment data
- Page 185 and 186:
ProjectNumber Project Name Variable
- Page 187 and 188:
8888888888ProjectNumber Project Nam
- Page 189 and 190:
ProjectNumber Project Name Variable
- Page 191 and 192:
Each data product received from the
- Page 193 and 194:
Table A3.4-4. Summary of the life h
- Page 195 and 196:
Figure A3.4-3. Querying data to pre
- Page 197 and 198:
An example of final output data fro
- Page 199 and 200:
ProjectNumberProject Variable Subse
- Page 201 and 202:
ProjectNumberProject Variable Subse
- Page 203 and 204:
ProjectNumberProject Variable Subse
- Page 205 and 206:
ProjectNumberProject Variable Subse
- Page 207 and 208:
ProjectNumber1212121212121212121212
- Page 209 and 210:
ProjectNumber1212121212121212121212
- Page 211 and 212:
A3.5 Data AnalysisA3.5.1 Qualitativ
- Page 213 and 214:
1. The adverse ecological impact ha
- Page 215 and 216:
7. Removal:“Has the removal of th
- Page 217 and 218:
Conceptual modelIn the U.S. Council
- Page 219 and 220:
Table A3.5-1. Complete summary of a
- Page 221 and 222:
egression model: β β xt + β ( x
- Page 223 and 224:
Figure A3.5-2. This is an example o
- Page 225 and 226:
as likely to be important by each o
- Page 227 and 228:
ocean during a particular month). W
- Page 229 and 230:
observations were given a value of
- Page 231 and 232:
Table A3.5-3. Summary of appropriat
- Page 233 and 234:
Table A3.5-4. Description of the 6
- Page 235 and 236:
(Equation A3.5-3) provided a better
- Page 237 and 238:
Model selectionWe use the Burnham a
- Page 239 and 240:
Limitationso We only considered the
- Page 241 and 242:
Bayesian belief networks (BBN)BBNs
- Page 243 and 244:
(Fennell), which is equivalent to a
- Page 245 and 246:
Figure A4.2-2. Stock composition, s
- Page 247 and 248:
Figure A4.2-4. Stock composition fo
- Page 249 and 250:
Figure A4.2-6. Stock composition fo
- Page 251 and 252:
Table A4.3-2. Description of the ac
- Page 253 and 254:
A4.3.2Model: A4cBrood years: 1969-2
- Page 255 and 256:
Table A4.3-5. Estimates for all fix
- Page 257 and 258:
Model: A4bBrood years: 1969-2001A s
- Page 259 and 260:
ModelSet_A4b_VarName M1 M2 M3 M4 M5
- Page 261 and 262:
M8 No stressor variables added. 0 1
- Page 263 and 264:
ModelSet_B4c_VarName M1 M2 M3 M4 M5
- Page 265 and 266:
Table A4.3-11. B4b candidate models
- Page 267 and 268:
ModelSet_B4b_VarName M1 M2 M3 M4 M5
- Page 269 and 270:
Table A4.3-14. C4a candidate models
- Page 271 and 272:
Model: C3a1980-2004A model set was
- Page 273 and 274:
Table A4.3-18. Estimates for all fi
- Page 275 and 276:
Table A4.3-20. QCS C1a candidate mo
- Page 277 and 278:
Table A4.3-22. Model specifications
- Page 279:
Table A4.3-24. Estimates for all fi
- Page 282 and 283:
Overview of Required Input DataInte
- Page 284 and 285:
This assessment should be the contr
- Page 286 and 287:
Estimation detailsObservation typeC
- Page 288 and 289:
Given the above definitions, you sh
- Page 290 and 291:
Technical and Scientific Research P
- Page 292 and 293:
BackgroundIn response to the declin
- Page 294 and 295:
aw data, the range of error around
- Page 296 and 297:
government documents and interviews
- Page 298 and 299:
for all CUs should not rule out usi
- Page 300 and 301:
Key issues raised by workshop parti
- Page 302 and 303:
Quantitative analysis will use inte
- Page 304 and 305:
o Changes inside Strait of Georgia
- Page 307 and 308:
ReferencesFaber-Langendoen, D., L.
- Page 309 and 310:
Appendix B: Workshop AgendaTechnica
- Page 311 and 312:
Workshop AgendaNovember 30 th , 201
- Page 313 and 314:
3:00 pm Break [15 minutes]• Exami
- Page 315 and 316:
Cohen Commission welcome and introd
- Page 317 and 318:
Challenges and OpportunitiesDave Ma
- Page 319 and 320:
Conclusion #1: Most other BC and La
- Page 321 and 322:
Peterman: That was done and it does
- Page 323 and 324:
Data needs, uncertainty and availab
- Page 325 and 326:
estimates, escapement enumeration,
- Page 327 and 328:
English: That’s certainly the cas
- Page 329 and 330:
Christensen: We keep hearing about
- Page 331 and 332:
wild salmonids, but it is highly le
- Page 333 and 334:
Kent: (…?) parasite mortality in
- Page 335 and 336:
A detailed hazard evaluation, which
- Page 337 and 338:
Urbanization upstream of Hope since
- Page 339 and 340:
coast. That winter featured wetter
- Page 341 and 342:
change was in 1989, but there was n
- Page 343 and 344:
Research program presentations (con
- Page 345 and 346:
qualitative), abundance of potentia
- Page 347 and 348:
Christensen: Bristol Bay stocks are
- Page 349 and 350:
Comments are welcomed on the indica
- Page 351 and 352:
Key metrics: The most important met
- Page 353 and 354:
degrees C per decade, but that tren
- Page 355 and 356:
subject less fit to deal with major
- Page 357 and 358:
Peterman: Before you conclude from
- Page 359 and 360:
McKinnell: There are no marine surv
- Page 361 and 362:
List of ParticipantsDave Marmorek,
- Page 363:
CohenCommissionProjectChange 1 (enr