12.07.2015 Views

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A3.2.1 Integrative quantitative metricsEach contractor (excepting projects #6, 7, 10, <strong>and</strong> 11) was instructed to provide <strong>data</strong> for a fewintegrative metrics (or indices) of the stressors that his or her research group examined. Project10 (Peterman <strong>and</strong> Dorner, 2011) was required to provide <strong>data</strong>; however, as they were providingthe productivity <strong>data</strong> of each stock to be used as the response variable (i.e. not a covariate orpotential stressor), the following criteria did not apply to their <strong>data</strong> submission.It was specified that the metrics provided should adhere to the following guidelines:• Few: Limit submission to 1-5 metrics per contractor. Additional metrics can be addedif justified – i.e., metric represents an important but independent source of variation.• Integrative: Each study will likely have a lot of <strong>data</strong>. The few integrative metricsprovided to ESSA should synthesize these <strong>data</strong>. Each contractor is a discipline expertthat will know which variables are most important or how best to integrate <strong>data</strong> intointegrative metrics.• Independent: Integrative metrics should be chosen to reflect independent sources ofvariation (i.e. not be highly correlated with each other).• Annual: The metrics provided by each contractor need to be provided annually, forthose years where <strong>data</strong> exist. Each contractor will know the most relevant approach tosummarize intra-annual <strong>data</strong> into an annual metric (e.g., maximum weekly averagetemperature experienced during upstream migration of each stock of <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong>).• Stock specific: Provide only one <strong>data</strong> point per stock per year. The same <strong>data</strong> pointmay apply to multiple stocks; contractors can specify which ones.Furthermore, each reported metric should be clearly connected with a biologically-supportedhypothesis that emphasizes why this metric is potentially important in explaining patterns in<strong>sockeye</strong> productivity over time <strong>and</strong>/or space. We also asked contractors to consider where theirhypotheses fit within an initial conceptual model that we provided.Finally, the original <strong>data</strong> sources <strong>and</strong> analytical methods would need to be explicitly described tocommunicate how each integrative metric was generated. The leaders of each project areexpected to be the experts on how to best integrate stressor-specific <strong>data</strong> over space <strong>and</strong> time, butall users (intermediate <strong>and</strong> final) must be able trace the steps by which an integrative metric wasgenerated from its primary sources. The <strong>data</strong> template therefore asked each contractor to providemeta<strong>data</strong>, describing all primary sources <strong>and</strong> assumptions used to derive the integrative metric.166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!