12.07.2015 Views

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Christensen: We keep hearing about over-escapement <strong>and</strong> that stocks are doing well when thereis lower escapement. What are the economic consequences of over-escapement is areasonable question to askBlewett: We would need to do that analysis: in years when there is very high escapement <strong>and</strong>foregone harvests, is that as serious as not meeting escapement targets.Hinch: How do you get NSERC information specific to <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong>?Blewett: We asked NSERC but have not received an answer.Hinch: Other groups are picking up the ball that DFO is dropping, with significant costs foruniversity research. How do you bring that into the picture?Routledge: Maybe instead of looking at costs or just tracking published DFO papers, you canalso compare that to how many other papers are published.Peterman: What is the purpose of this part of the assessment? Collectively we aren’t spendingenough on <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> – is that the purpose?Blewett: In part. It’s to describe the state of science <strong>and</strong> research – is there enough of it.Peterman: You also need to ask the managers. It’s one thing to do a lot of research <strong>and</strong> another tosee if it’s informing management. The number of studies won’t measure the latter. We needthat input as well or it’s missing the point.Blewett: The evaluation is focused on management, not science. The third project gets atresearch capacity.Peterman: That’s a different question than what is needed to make management decisions. Thebenefits of that research can’t be measured by dollars spent.Blewett: That’s a massive piece of work.Staley: The bulk of expenditures are on management (e.g. spawning ground enumerations). Mostare directly management-related.English: Our report may help a bit. We will document what information there is to supportescapement monitoring, in-season abundance estimates <strong>and</strong> catch monitoring. You will seeclearly that the amount of documentation supporting each of these components is strikinglylittle. Most recent effort has been focused on defining the CUs <strong>and</strong> now the benchmarks. Theother piece done regularly is the pre-season forecast. Outside of that there are not manydocuments that describe other efforts. The PSC is now drafting a document that describes thein-season assessment systems. The fact that was not documented before is a concern.Marmorek: Given the difference in performance for Bristol Bay, it would be interesting to lookat how much they spend on science as a reference point.Wieckowski: Beyond how much is spent in the US, there is a structural difference regarding USmanagers <strong>and</strong> their powers, so just looking at spending doesn’t do it justice.Blewett: We are looking at the East Coast <strong>and</strong> what is comparable.Cox: The Columbia <strong>River</strong> would be comparableMcKinnell: The difference between Canadian <strong>and</strong> US research expenditure is in orders ofmagnitude.40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!