12.07.2015 Views

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusion #1: Most other BC <strong>and</strong> Lake Washington <strong>sockeye</strong> stocks show a similar pattern ofdeclining productivity to that of most <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> stocks, especially since the late1990s.For 8 <strong>Fraser</strong> stocks that have juvenile <strong>data</strong> available, a similar analysis of spawner-to-juvenile<strong>and</strong> juvenile-to-recruit <strong>data</strong> showed very high correlation between juvenile-to-recruit <strong>and</strong>spawner-to-recruit trends, suggesting that most mortality associated with these productivity shiftsover the whole life span is occurring in the late juvenile to adult life phase (although it couldpossibly represent delayed mortality from a freshwater agent to which they were exposedearlier).An analysis of <strong>data</strong> for Tahltan age 1+ <strong>and</strong> age 2+ smolts compared survival rates for those thathave the same brood year but different ocean-entry year <strong>and</strong> found a correlation of r = 0.24. Butwhen <strong>data</strong> for smolts with the same ocean-entry year were compared instead, the correlationjumped to 0.56. The latter, higher correlation when juveniles have a shared ocean-entry year vs.the same brood year indicates that shared marine or late freshwater conditions dominate changesin productivity of these <strong>sockeye</strong> stocks.Conclusion #2: Most of the temporal changes in recruits/spawner arise in the marine <strong>and</strong> orfreshwater post-juvenile estimation stages. The Tahltan analysis indicates this is unlikely due todelayed mortality from a freshwater agent. Furthermore, the similarity of the productivity declinethroughout Washington <strong>and</strong> BC <strong>sockeye</strong> stocks, especially after around the year 2000, suggestspoor ocean conditions outside of Georgia Strait. This conclusion differs from the PSC workshopin June, because they have these new <strong>data</strong> now.Harrison <strong>sockeye</strong>, which have shown an opposite trend in productivity, enter the sea as fry (notsmolts) <strong>and</strong> are believed to migrate out through Juan de Fuca Strait, not Johnstone Strait.These results of a shared time trend in productivity of B.C. stocks, but the opposite trend forAlaskan stocks, would be consistent with a paper by Mueter et al. (2002, Can. J. Fish. AquaticSci. 59:456), which linked productivity declines in BC to increases in stock-specific locations forsummer sea surface temperature (SST) when juveniles enter the ocean. Specifically, changes inindividual <strong>sockeye</strong> stock productivity (log e (recruits per spawner)) per degree Centigrade increasein summer SST (SST coefficient) were graphed for stocks ranging from Washington <strong>and</strong> BCnorth to Alaska. The resulting graph showed a clear pattern of increasing productivity for Alaskastocks with increasing SST, <strong>and</strong> decreasing productivity for BC <strong>and</strong> Washington stocks withincreasing SST. Potential causes of this BC trend include a zooplankton-poor or predator-richenvironment when waters are relatively warm off the coast of BC.Brigitte DornerFurther analysis of <strong>sockeye</strong> productivity trends in relation to changes in summer sea surfacetemperature looked at the bigger picture coast-wide.Two types of animated graphs were shown. First was an animated map of the time-trend inindividual stock productivities for BC, with one map per year starting in 1950. During certainperiods, geographical clusters of <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> stocks (based on their spawning-ground location)appeared to change in similar ways. The other animated diagram showed stock-specificproductivities since 1950 (as derived from the Kalman filter analyses), illustrating in yet anotherway that when productivity for <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>and</strong> Washington stocks were generally declining,those in Bristol Bay were increasing over the same period.30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!