Volume 2: Draft Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement

More documents

Recommendations

Info

GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT, SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURESMitigation Measure Descriptioni. Areas with prior negative archaeological survey, no ground disturbance,or in 100 percent culturally-sterile fill: 1) document reason no survey isrequired; 2) require no further review.ii. For all ground-disturbing projects not addressed in “i” above: 1) consultstatewide predictive model and tribal predictive model; 2) provide tribalnotification; 3) if no known cultural resources are present, conditionpermit with standard inadvertent discovery language; 4) if knowncultural resources are present, provide state and tribal notification,conduct survey; 5) In the event that a proposed project would disturban archaeological resource, the responsible local government shallimpose any and all measures to avoid or substantially lessen the impact;6) if avoidance of the archaeological resource is not possible, anappropriate research design/treatment program must be designed andimplemented with data recovery to occur prior to project relatedground disturbance; 7) the avoidance of archaeological resourcesthrough selected of project alternatives and changes in design to avoidthe archaeological resource would eliminate the need for measuring ormitigating impacts.B. In the event that a proposed development location within the Study Areacontains a building or structure at least 45 years of age that is not listed in theWHR or the NRHP, the project shall be required to undergo a review to determineif the building/structure is considered eligible for listing on the State or NationalRegisters. If impacts cannot be avoided on a historic resource that is determinedeligible for listing on either state or national historic registers, the responsiblelocal government is required to consult with DAHP about mitigation options.C. If human skeletal remains are encountered during construction, thecontractor/project proponent will stop work and the Kitsap County Sheriff, DAHP,and the necessary Tribes will be contacted immediately.D. If archaeological resources are encountered during construction, work must stopuntil state and tribal notifications are made and until a qualified archaeologist canassess the discovery and implement mitigation if necessary.TimingPrior to ConstructionDuring ConstructionDuring Construction• Kitsap County and the City of Bremerton in coordination with the Suquamish Tribe could periodically conducteducational activities with residents and businesses regarding the importance of cultural resources, how toavoid impacts, and what to do in cases of inadvertent discovery. Such educational activities could promotevoluntary notification to the local government and tribe of activities exempt from SEPA or the planned action,but which may result in ground disturbance (e.g. fences, gardening, etc.).Significant Unavoidable Adverse ImpactsThe impacts on cultural resources caused by new development associated with all studied alternatives could besignificant and unavoidable, depending on the nature and proximity of the proposed development project.Implementation of mitigation measures would identify potential impacts on cultural resources and reduce them toa less than significant level (Table 3.10-6 Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures).Draft | June 2013 3-144
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT, SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES3.11 TransportationCumulatively, the study area transportation system has been addressed in the following EISs, for which thetransportation analysis is incorporated by reference:• SKIA Subarea Plan and Planned Action August 2012. A small portion of the SKIA area lies in the watershed.• UGA Sizing and Composition Remand Final EIS August 2012. This EIS addressed eight UGAs including the GorstUGA as well as a cumulative analysis countywide including South County.To the extent relevant, this transportation analysis updates the Kitsap County transportation analysis reflecting thelower employment growth adopted in the City of Bremerton’s SKIA Subarea Plan. It tests the differences in thegrowth in the Gorst UGA, which is the focus of land use changes under consideration in the Gorst Subarea Plan.Affected EnvironmentWatershedThe primary arterial network roadways in the Watershed include State Route 3, West Belfair Valley Road, SW OldClifton Road, and Sunnyslope Road SE. See Figure 3.11-1 Gorst Creek Watershed: Existing Roadway Inventory. Thefocus of future land use changes is in the Gorst UGA, The affected environment related to transportation isdiscussed in the Gorst UGA section.Gorst UGAThe affected environment related to transportation in the Gorst UGA includes state highways, Kitsap Countyrights-of-way, state interchanges and bridges, bikeways and trails, public transportation facilities and services, andDepartment of Defense railroad. In addition marine ports, ferries, and airports located outside of the Gorst UGAare considered key transportation facilities. The State, County, and special districts share jurisdiction over thesefacilities.This section discusses existing conditions relating to transportation in the Gorst UGA, including state and localregulations and policies; inventory of transportation infrastructure and services, including roadway, transit, nonmotorized,rail, air, and ferry; and existing operational conditions of the transportation system.Planning ContextWashington GMAGMA provides direction regarding preparation of the transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. The GMArequires a transportation chapter to be consistent with the land use chapter of the comprehensive plan, ascodified in RCW 36.70A.070 (6). Planned land use must be reflected in the travel forecasts that are prepared toevaluate the impacts of development. The transportation improvements and implementation measures in thetransportation chapter must adequately support planned land use at adopted LOS standards.Draft | June 2013 3-145
Page 1 and 2:
KITSAP COUNTYCITY OF BREMERTONHED P
Page 3 and 4:
VOLUME 2: GORST PLANNED ACTIONENVIR
Page 7 and 8:
FACT SHEETProject TitleGorst Creek
Page 9 and 10:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | FACT SHE
Page 11 and 12:
TABLE OF CONTENTSFact Sheet .......
Page 13 and 14:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | TABLE OF
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
1.0 SUMMARY1.1 Purpose of Proposed
Page 25 and 26:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARY
Page 27 and 28:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYP
Page 29 and 30:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYs
Page 31 and 32:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYi
Page 33 and 34:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYa
Page 35 and 36:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYT
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYA
Page 51 and 52:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYs
Page 53 and 54:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYA
Page 55 and 56:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYd
Page 57 and 58:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYI
Page 59 and 60:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYo
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYi
Page 65 and 66:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYI
Page 67 and 68:
2.0 ALTERNATIVES2.1 IntroductionThe
Page 69 and 70:
FIGURE 2-1 GORST CREEK WATERSHED AE
Page 71 and 72:
FIGURE 2-2 GORST URBAN GROWTH AREAW
Page 73 and 74:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | ALTERNAT
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
FIGURE 2-3 GORST WATERSHED PLANNING
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
FIGURE 2-4 GORST UGA LAND USE: ALTE
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
FIGURE 2-10 GORST WATERSHED ASSESSM
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
FIGURE 2-11 GORST CREEK WATERSHED:
Page 101 and 102:
FIGURE 2-12 GORST WATERSHED PLANNIN
Page 103 and 104:
FIGURE 2-13 PROPOSED FISH PASSAGE B
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | AFFECTED
Page 111 and 112:
Lake UnionReservoirQgdQaQgoQgoBreme
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
City UtilityLandsBremerton West UGA
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
GorstCreek.Jarstad CreekBremerton W
Page 127 and 128:
FIGURE 3.2-3 GORST: IDENTIFIED EXIS
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
FIGURE 3.4-1 GORST CREEK WATERSHED:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Bremerton West UGAW BELFAIR VALLEY
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202: GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | AFFECTED
Page 207 and 208: FIGURE 3.7-1 GORST WATERSHED PLANNI
Page 209 and 210: FIGURE 3.7-2 GORST CREEK WATERSHED:
Page 245 and 246: Lake UnionReservoirBremertonHeinsCr
Page 251: GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | AFFECTED
Page 255 and 256: Lake UnionReservoirBremertonHeinsCr
Page 285 and 286: FIGURE 3.12-1 GORST WATERSHED PLANN
Page 289 and 290: FIGURE 3.12-2 GORST CREEK WATERSHED
Page 299 and 300: FIGURE 3.12-3 GORST CREEK WATERSHED
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
FIGURE 3.12-4 GORST CREEK WATERSHED
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Bremerton West UGAGorst UGAPump Sta
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
FIGURE 3.14-1 GORST: COMPARISON OF
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
4.0 REFERENCES4.1 Personal Communic
Page 373 and 374:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | REFERENC
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
5.0 DISTRIBUTION LISTThe following
Page 381 and 382:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | APPENDIC
Page 383 and 384:
GORST CREEK WATERSHED PLAN, GORST S
Page 385 and 386:
Date Name/Agency Summarysharedpatht
Page 387 and 388:
Exhibit 2. SWOT AnalysisStrengths -
Page 389 and 390:
IhaverentalpropertiesthatarezonedHT
Page 391 and 392:
ATTACHMENTSA. Scoping Advertisement
Page 396:
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Page 402:
What is an Environmental Impact Sta
Page 406:
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
ORDINANCE NO.________AN ORDINANCE O
Page 419 and 420:
PLANNED ACTION ORDINANCEfor the pla
Page 421 and 422:
PLANNED ACTION ORDINANCE(4) Element
Page 423 and 424:
PLANNED ACTION ORDINANCESection 5.
Page 425 and 426:
PLANNED ACTION ORDINANCEEXHIBIT BPL
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Gorst Planned Action EIS | Appendic
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
show all

Volume 2: Draft Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?