Volume 2: Draft Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement

More documents

Recommendations

Info

GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT, SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURESTable 3.13-1Solid Waste Facility InventoryName Owner Operator LocationDisposalOVTS KCPW WMWI City of BremertonSolid Waste CollectionOlalla RAGF KCPW WMWI South KitsapHansville RAGF KCPW KCPW North KitsapSilverdale RAGF KCPW WMWI Central KitsapBainbridge Island Transfer Station COBD Bainbridge Disposal City of Bainbridge IslandHousehold Hazardous WasteCollection FacilityResidential RecyclablesCollectionNotes: Olympic View Transfer Station (OVTS), Recycling & Garbage Facility (RAGF), Kitsap County Public Works (KCPW), WasteManagement Washington, Inc. (WMWI), City of Bainbridge Island Disposal (COBD)Source: Kitsap County Solid Waste Division, 2012; and BERK, 2013LOSKCPW KCPW City of BremertonOVTS Recycling Area KCPW WMWI South KitsapOlalla RAGF KCPW WMWI South KitsapHansville RAGF Kitsap County KCPW North KitsapSilverdale RAGF KCPW WMWI Central KitsapBainbridge Island Transfer Station Bainbridge Disposal Bainbridge Disposal Bainbridge IslandPoulsbo Recycle Center KCPW KCPW City of PoulsboThe existing LOS is calculated based on estimated service population and the average per-capita generation ratesfor solid waste and recycling, as shown in Table 3.13- 2 Current Solid Waste LOS Requirements. The figures in thistable were taken from Kitsap County’s Solid Waste and Hazardous Waste Management Plan Wise Communities:The Future of Solid and Hazardous Waste Management in Kitsap County (Kitsap County, 2011).Time PeriodCountywidePopulationTable 3.13-2Current Solid Waste LOS RequirementsSW GenerationRate 1(lbs/cap/day)SW Tons GeneratedPer Year 2SW RecyclingRate(lbs/cap/day)Recycled TonsPer Year2010 251,133 5.0 229,000 2.0 92,000Note:1 SW Generation Rate shown is calculated from SW produced within Kitsap County and North Mason County.2SW generated does not include recycled waste.Source: Kitsap County Solid Waste Division, 2012 communication; and BERK, 2013The County is in the middle of a 20-year contract that took effect in 2002 to send waste to a landfill owned byWMWI. The landfill has capacity for 50 to 100 years and has additional acreage that could be permitted to increaseits capacity further. Planning at the County level with WMWI occurs on a yearly basis based on future projectedneeds. The County will have adequate time to plan for 2035 levels of waste generation, and projected levels, asnoted below, could be accommodated at the current landfill site if a new or extended contract is enacted.Draft | June 2013 3-220
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT, SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURESGorst UGAAs noted above, solid waste management is managed by Kitsap County Public Works (KCPW) in contract withWMWI. This is a regional service, and the facilities and levels of service are as noted above for the Gorst Creekwatershed.ImpactsIMPACTS COMMON TO ALL ALTERNATIVESWatershedNo land use changes are proposed for the Gorst Creek watershed outside the Gorst UGA. Updated stormwater andhabitat regulations in this area are not anticipated to have significant effects on solid waste management needs inthis area.Gorst UGASince solid waste service is provided on a regional level, impacts to the service provider (Waste Management) andmanagement organization are nearly identical whether or not Gorst is annexed by the City of Bremerton.The additional population capacity generated under the three alternatives would marginally increase demand forsolid waste capacity. The County, through contracts with private haulers, will continue to be able to provide solidwaste management for an increased population regardless of the alternative ultimately chosen. The County wouldhave adequate time to plan for landfill capacity for solid waste generation under all alternatives, and the County’scurrent contracted landfill location is expected to have sufficient capacity through 2025 and beyond if a new orextended contact is enacted.Alternative 1Under the No Action Alternative, population in the Gorst UGA would grow by approximately 82 people through2035. This Alternative is identical to the Preferred Alternative adopted in the 2012 Kitsap County ComprehensivePlan CFP.Assuming a solid waste generation rate of 5 lbs/capita/day and recycling rate of 2 lbs/capita/day results in about301,000 tons of solid waste and 120,000 tons of recycling per year. These totals could be managed with existinglandfill capacity.Alternative 2Alternative 2 models a moderate growth level for the Gorst UGA, higher than under the No Action Alternative butlower than under Alternative 3. Alternative 2 assumes a 2035 Gorst UGA population of 1,207, which is an increaseof 985 residents over current population levels.Assuming a solid waste generation rate of 5 lbs/capita/day and recycling rate of 2 lbs/capita/day results in about301,000 tons of solid waste and 121,000 tons of recycling per year. These totals could be managed with existinglandfill capacity.Alternative 3Alternative 3 models the highest growth level for the Gorst UGA, and assumes a 2035 Gorst UGA population of1,304, which is an increase of 1,082 residents over current population levels.Assuming a solid waste generation rate of 5 lbs/capita/day and recycling rate of 2 lbs/capita/day results in about301,000 tons of solid waste and 121,000 tons of recycling per year. These totals could be managed with existinglandfill capacity.Draft | June 2013 3-221
Page 1 and 2:
KITSAP COUNTYCITY OF BREMERTONHED P
Page 3 and 4:
VOLUME 2: GORST PLANNED ACTIONENVIR
Page 7 and 8:
FACT SHEETProject TitleGorst Creek
Page 9 and 10:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | FACT SHE
Page 11 and 12:
TABLE OF CONTENTSFact Sheet .......
Page 13 and 14:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | TABLE OF
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
1.0 SUMMARY1.1 Purpose of Proposed
Page 25 and 26:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARY
Page 27 and 28:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYP
Page 29 and 30:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYs
Page 31 and 32:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYi
Page 33 and 34:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYa
Page 35 and 36:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYT
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYA
Page 51 and 52:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYs
Page 53 and 54:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYA
Page 55 and 56:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYd
Page 57 and 58:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYI
Page 59 and 60:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYo
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYi
Page 65 and 66:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | SUMMARYI
Page 67 and 68:
2.0 ALTERNATIVES2.1 IntroductionThe
Page 69 and 70:
FIGURE 2-1 GORST CREEK WATERSHED AE
Page 71 and 72:
FIGURE 2-2 GORST URBAN GROWTH AREAW
Page 73 and 74:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | ALTERNAT
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
FIGURE 2-3 GORST WATERSHED PLANNING
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
FIGURE 2-4 GORST UGA LAND USE: ALTE
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
FIGURE 2-10 GORST WATERSHED ASSESSM
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
FIGURE 2-11 GORST CREEK WATERSHED:
Page 101 and 102:
FIGURE 2-12 GORST WATERSHED PLANNIN
Page 103 and 104:
FIGURE 2-13 PROPOSED FISH PASSAGE B
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | AFFECTED
Page 111 and 112:
Lake UnionReservoirQgdQaQgoQgoBreme
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
City UtilityLandsBremerton West UGA
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
GorstCreek.Jarstad CreekBremerton W
Page 127 and 128:
FIGURE 3.2-3 GORST: IDENTIFIED EXIS
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
FIGURE 3.4-1 GORST CREEK WATERSHED:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Bremerton West UGAW BELFAIR VALLEY
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
FIGURE 3.7-1 GORST WATERSHED PLANNI
Page 209 and 210:
FIGURE 3.7-2 GORST CREEK WATERSHED:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Lake UnionReservoirBremertonHeinsCr
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Lake UnionReservoirBremertonHeinsCr
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278: GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | AFFECTED
Page 285 and 286: FIGURE 3.12-1 GORST WATERSHED PLANN
Page 289 and 290: FIGURE 3.12-2 GORST CREEK WATERSHED
Page 327: GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | AFFECTED
Page 337 and 338: Bremerton West UGAGorst UGAPump Sta
Page 359 and 360: FIGURE 3.14-1 GORST: COMPARISON OF
Page 371 and 372: 4.0 REFERENCES4.1 Personal Communic
Page 373 and 374: GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | REFERENC
Page 379 and 380:
5.0 DISTRIBUTION LISTThe following
Page 381 and 382:
GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | APPENDIC
Page 383 and 384:
GORST CREEK WATERSHED PLAN, GORST S
Page 385 and 386:
Date Name/Agency Summarysharedpatht
Page 387 and 388:
Exhibit 2. SWOT AnalysisStrengths -
Page 389 and 390:
IhaverentalpropertiesthatarezonedHT
Page 391 and 392:
ATTACHMENTSA. Scoping Advertisement
Page 396:
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Page 402:
What is an Environmental Impact Sta
Page 406:
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
ORDINANCE NO.________AN ORDINANCE O
Page 419 and 420:
PLANNED ACTION ORDINANCEfor the pla
Page 421 and 422:
PLANNED ACTION ORDINANCE(4) Element
Page 423 and 424:
PLANNED ACTION ORDINANCESection 5.
Page 425 and 426:
PLANNED ACTION ORDINANCEEXHIBIT BPL
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Gorst Planned Action EIS | Appendic
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
show all

Volume 2: Draft Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?