Volume 2: Draft Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement

GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | ALTERNATIVESAU No.IntegratedResults11 RestorationArea 2ANotes and Suggested Management MeasuresHigh habitat and salmon refugia scores identify this as a priority area to undertakerestoration actions. The golf course has degraded many of the wetlands and water courses;a comprehensive restoration program should be developed to restore these areas. Rechargeis the key process to restore. Also restore discharge and storage processes.12 Protection Same as No. 4 Headwaters AU: processes essentially intact, high habitat value. Maintainforest cover and protective zoning.13 Protection Same as No. 4 Headwaters AU: processes essentially intact, high habitat value. Maintainforest cover and protective zoning.14 Protection Same as No. 4 Headwaters AU: processes essentially intact, high habitat value. Maintainforest cover and protective zoning.15 Development Relatively high level of degradation and low habitat score; more appropriate area for higherdensity development provided measures are applied to reduce potential sediment export.16 Development The western edge of this AU is degraded by airport development. It has a moderately highscore for salmon refugia, so the AU stream should be adequately protected (appropriatewidth buffers). More appropriate area for higher density development within the GorstCreek Watershed, provided that streams and wetlands have adequate buffer protection.17 DevelopmentArea 3B18 RestorationArea 2BAlthough the overall assessment for water flow indicated “development,” this area shouldreceive a higher degree of protection based on moderate high habitat value. May be anappropriate area for low-to-moderate density development, provided habitat resources(forest, streams, and wetlands) are protected through use of clustering. Landfill indownstream, northern portion of AU has collapsed the culvert-carrying stream, which givesit priority for restoration.Overall, this AU has a low-to-moderate value for water flow processes and habitat.Appropriate area for moderate density development, provided that existing streams andwetlands receive adequate protection and restoration of wetland storage functions wherethey have been degraded; wetlands will help control downstream erosion in AU8.19 Protection Same as No. 4 Headwaters AU: processes essentially intact, high habitat value. Limit forestryactivities given high sediment export potential. Maintain forest cover and protective zoning.20 Protection Same as No. 4 Headwaters AU: processes essentially intact, high habitat value. Limit forestryactivities given high sediment export potential. Maintain forest cover and protective zoning.Source: City of Bremerton 2012In addition, the Watershed Characterization Study has prompted capital planning intended to address stormwaterand flooding deficiencies and fish passage barriers. A map of stormwater improvement locations is shown in Figure2-11 Gorst Creek Watershed: Existing Drainage Deficiencies. Where possible regional stormwater solutions can beconsidered in County and City capital facility plans. Potential improvements on private property would be theresponsibility of the private property owner and would be considered at the time of a development application orother property owner initiative.A map of fish passage barriers and an example proposed recommended improvement along Parish Creek areshown in Figure 2-12 Gorst Creek Watershed Planning Area: Fish Passage Barriers and Figure 2-13 Proposed FishPassage Barrier Improvement – Parish Creek, respectively.Draft | June 2013 2-32