12.07.2015 Views

Volume 2: Draft Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement

Volume 2: Draft Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement

Volume 2: Draft Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GORST PLANNED ACTION EIS | AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT, SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES<strong>Gorst</strong> UGAAs noted above, solid waste management is managed by Kitsap County Public Works (KCPW) in contract withWMWI. This is a regional service, and the facilities and levels of service are as noted above for the <strong>Gorst</strong> Creekwatershed.<strong>Impact</strong>sIMPACTS COMMON TO ALL ALTERNATIVESWatershedNo land use changes are proposed for the <strong>Gorst</strong> Creek watershed outside the <strong>Gorst</strong> UGA. Updated stormwater andhabitat regulations in this area are not anticipated to have significant effects on solid waste management needs inthis area.<strong>Gorst</strong> UGASince solid waste service is provided on a regional level, impacts to the service provider (Waste Management) andmanagement organization are nearly identical whether or not <strong>Gorst</strong> is annexed by the City of Bremerton.The additional population capacity generated under the three alternatives would marginally increase demand forsolid waste capacity. The County, through contracts with private haulers, will continue to be able to provide solidwaste management for an increased population regardless of the alternative ultimately chosen. The County wouldhave adequate time to plan for landfill capacity for solid waste generation under all alternatives, and the County’scurrent contracted landfill location is expected to have sufficient capacity through 2025 and beyond if a new orextended contact is enacted.Alternative 1Under the No <strong>Action</strong> Alternative, population in the <strong>Gorst</strong> UGA would grow by approximately 82 people through2035. This Alternative is identical to the Preferred Alternative adopted in the 2012 Kitsap County ComprehensivePlan CFP.Assuming a solid waste generation rate of 5 lbs/capita/day and recycling rate of 2 lbs/capita/day results in about301,000 tons of solid waste and 120,000 tons of recycling per year. These totals could be managed with existinglandfill capacity.Alternative 2Alternative 2 models a moderate growth level for the <strong>Gorst</strong> UGA, higher than under the No <strong>Action</strong> Alternative butlower than under Alternative 3. Alternative 2 assumes a 2035 <strong>Gorst</strong> UGA population of 1,207, which is an increaseof 985 residents over current population levels.Assuming a solid waste generation rate of 5 lbs/capita/day and recycling rate of 2 lbs/capita/day results in about301,000 tons of solid waste and 121,000 tons of recycling per year. These totals could be managed with existinglandfill capacity.Alternative 3Alternative 3 models the highest growth level for the <strong>Gorst</strong> UGA, and assumes a 2035 <strong>Gorst</strong> UGA population of1,304, which is an increase of 1,082 residents over current population levels.Assuming a solid waste generation rate of 5 lbs/capita/day and recycling rate of 2 lbs/capita/day results in about301,000 tons of solid waste and 121,000 tons of recycling per year. These totals could be managed with existinglandfill capacity.<strong>Draft</strong> | June 2013 3-221

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!