12.07.2015 Views

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Propagation <strong>of</strong> Islam: By Force or Peacefully?means, the Sufis were invariably the spiritual and moral supporter <strong>of</strong> bloody holy wars that were waged byMuslim rulers. They were even prominent participants in them. In Kashmir, it is the Sufis, who inspiredbloody Jihad that involved whole-sale destruction <strong>of</strong> Hindu temples and idols, slaughter <strong>of</strong> Hindus and their<strong>forced</strong> <strong>conversion</strong> to Islam. The mentality, attitude and actions <strong>of</strong> these illustrious Sufis saints <strong>of</strong> medievalIndia—whether in Ajmer, Bengal, Bijapur, Delhi or Kashmir—differed very little. Hence, the role Sufisplayed in <strong>conversion</strong> all over India may not have been very different from the one, they played in Kashmir.It should be noted that the Muslim rulers <strong>of</strong> India were incessantly undertaking holy wars against themultitude <strong>of</strong> Hindus. Many <strong>of</strong> these wars involved mass slaughter <strong>of</strong> the vanquished and enslavement <strong>of</strong> tensto hundreds <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> women and children for their <strong>conversion</strong> to Islam. Not a single famous Sufi saintever objected to this cruel and barbaric practice and means <strong>of</strong> converting the infidels en masse to Islam. Nogreat Sufi saint <strong>of</strong> India ever made a statement, condemning these barbaric acts. They never asked the rulersto stop their barbaric expeditions and means <strong>of</strong> <strong>conversion</strong> on the pain <strong>of</strong> death. None <strong>of</strong> them ever said: ‘Donot capture the Hindus for <strong>conversion</strong> to Islam in this cruel manner. Leave the job to us. That’s our mission tobe achieved thorough peaceful persuasion.’ Instead, they <strong>of</strong>fered unstinted support, indeed encouragement;and even, eager participation, in those barbaric wars.The instances <strong>of</strong> Sufis’ involvement in converting the Hindus in Kashmir, Gujarat and Bengal givesclear idea about the means they applied in perfect harmony with their deranged ideology and attitude towardnon-Muslims and their creeds. In Kashmir, they were the ones to inspire the rulers to unleash brutality againstthe Hindus and their <strong>forced</strong> <strong>conversion</strong>. There is no evidence to support the claim that they converted non-Muslims through peaceful means in large numbers. If such <strong>conversion</strong>s ever took place—those, at best,played a peripheral role in the overall <strong>conversion</strong> in medieval India. Their role elsewhere was, likely, evenless prominent.Few documentations <strong>of</strong> peaceful <strong>conversion</strong> by Sufis: Muslim historians have left piles <strong>of</strong>documentation <strong>of</strong> the infidels being <strong>forced</strong> to convert in the battlefields and through enslavement in largenumbers in the course <strong>of</strong> ceaseless Muslim expeditions to all corners <strong>of</strong> medieval India. Not a singledocument makes mention <strong>of</strong> an occasion, in which a Sufi converted the Hindus to Islam in significantnumbers through nonviolent means.Sultan Mahmud enslaved 500,000 Hindus in his first expedition to India, who instantly becameincorporated into Islam. Shams Shiraj Afif records that Sultan Firoz Tughlaq converted a great number <strong>of</strong>Hindus to Islam by <strong>of</strong>fering them relief from the oppressive and humiliating jizyah and other onerous taxes, 292which is also claimed by the sultan himself (discussed above). According to Afif, he had collected 180,000Hindus boys as slaves; ‘Some <strong>of</strong> the slaves spent their time in reading and committing to memory the holybook, others in religious studies, others in copying books.’ 293 Even during the rule <strong>of</strong> enlightened Akbar, whohad prohibited enslavement and <strong>forced</strong> <strong>conversion</strong>, his not-so-illustrious General Abdulla Khan Uzbeg, whoruled Malwa for only about two years, had converted 500,000 infidels to Islam through enslavement. 294 Theforefathers <strong>of</strong> today’s Muslims <strong>of</strong> North West Provinces converted to Islam mostly during the reign <strong>of</strong> fanaticAurangzeb in order to avoid persecution, attain privileged rights, and to be relieved <strong>of</strong> the burdensomediscriminatory taxes.In the midst <strong>of</strong> this dominant coercive mode <strong>of</strong> <strong>conversion</strong>, there exists few evidence or record thatthe Sufis made significant contributions to proselytization. Based on historical investigation <strong>of</strong> <strong>conversion</strong> inmedieval India, noted Habib, ‘The Musalmans have no missionary labor to record… We find no trace <strong>of</strong>292. Sharma, p. 185293. Elliot & Dawson, Vol. III, p. 341294. Lal (1994), p. 7398

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!