islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

The Arab–Islamic Imperialismbanner of Islam says a prophetic tradition: ‘Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Authority of ruling will remain withQuraysh, and whoever bears hostility to them, Allah will destroy him as long as they abide by the laws of thereligion’’ [Bukhari 4:56:704].Therefore, the Islamic deity clearly revealed Islam to be an Arab-supremacist religion—opposed to what many great scholars have to say about the egalitarian nature of Islam. Not only that,the Islamic deity is also a white supremacist—that is, an anti-Black racist—who will turn thedoomed unbelievers black on the day of Judgement:1. ‘On the Day of Judgment wilt thou see those who told lies against Allah; their faces will beturned black…’ [Quran 39:60]2. ‘On the Day when some faces will be white, and some faces will be black: To those whosefaces will be black (will be said): ‘Did ye reject Faith after accepting it? Taste then thepenalty for rejecting Faith.’ But those, whose faces will be white, they will be in Allah’smercy...’ [Quran 3:106–07]3. ‘For those who do good is good (reward) and more (than this); and blackness or ignominyshall not cover their faces… And those who have earned evil… they shall have none toprotect them from Allah—as if their faces had been covered with slices of the densedarkness of night…’ [Quran 10:26–27]The Arab supremacism and anti-Black racism were not simply the divine writ in Islam to sit idle; they were aliving reality since the early time of Islam to the present day. Today, the Middle East Arabs treat their Muslimcoreligionists from countries like Bangladesh or Africa with contempt and belittlement. Famous Islamicscholar Ignaz Goldziher, out of his ignorance of the Quranic scruples, also thought that Islam taughtunequivocal equality of all Muslims before God. Goldziher is, therefore, unnecessarily at pain for the Arabs’historical disregard for Islam’s alleged equality for all, as he says, ‘the Muslim teachings of the equality of allmen in Islam remained a dead letter for a long time, never realized in the consciousness of Arabs, androundly denied in their day to day behaviour.’ 407After the Arab Muslims burst out of Arabia, and conquered vast territories and established rule overthem, they never conceded equality to the non-Arab converts; they were the ruling lords and the Muslims ofother races were second-class subjects. Of course, that’s how it was to be in the writ of Allah. The Arabstreated the non-Arab converts with belittlement, subjecting them ‘to a whole series of fiscal, social, political,military and other disabilities.’ 408 The Arabs exercised a policy of apartheid against their non-Arab Muslimbrethren. According to Cambridge History of Islam,They lead them into battles on foot. They deprived them of booty. 409 They would not walk on thesame side of the street with them, nor sit at the same repast. In nearly every place, separateencampments and mosques were constructed for their use. Marriage between them and the Arabswas considered a social crime. 410Islam was born, undoubtedly, to be a global imperialism ruled by the Arabs, and preferably, by the Quraysh—the tribe of Prophet Muhammad. Therefore, throughout history, it became a fashion, indeed a necessity forlegitimacy, for Muslim monarchs to link their genealogy to the Arabs, more specifically, to the clan ofQuraysh. Well into mid-twentieth century, the dark-skinned Nawab of Bahawalpur (Sindh), who had an407. Goldziher, p. 98408. Lewis B (1966) The Arabs in History, Oxford University Press, New York, p. 38409. Examples of these treatments will be found in the chapter on Slavery.410. Ibn Warraq, p. 202136