12.07.2015 Views

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Islamic Jihadbecame Buddhists; in Central Asia they became Muslims; perhaps some in Russia and Hungary becameChristians.’ 367 But the Islamic conquerors acted on destroying the culture <strong>of</strong> the conquered infidels because <strong>of</strong>the fundamental Muslim belief that the vestiges <strong>of</strong> the pre-Islamic jahiliyah age must be replaced by theperfect religious, political and cultural civilization <strong>of</strong> Islam. From India to Spain, the destruction <strong>of</strong> countlessnumbers <strong>of</strong> Pagan temples, Buddhist monasteries, Christian churches, Jewish synagogues, and so on bearstestimony <strong>of</strong> the widespread destruction <strong>of</strong> non-Islamic cultures by Muslim invaders. The Islamic conquests,therefore, came at "extraordinary cultural costs", 368 which remains thoroughly unacknowledged. Instead, theMuslim invaders, surprisingly, have been widely credited with enriching the civilizations <strong>of</strong> the conquered. Incomparing and contrasting the impact <strong>of</strong> European and Arab (Islamic) rules on the cultural and civilizationalaspects <strong>of</strong> the ruled, Ibn Warraq laments:Although Europeans are constantly being castigated for having imposed their insidious anddecadent values, cultures and language on the Third World, no one cares to point out that Islamcolonized lands that were the home <strong>of</strong> advanced and ancient civilizations, and that in doing so,Islamic colonialism trampled under foot and permanently destroyed many cultures. 369Therefore, apart from the purpose <strong>of</strong> economic exploitation and political domination, the Islamic invaders alsocame with an over-riding mission <strong>of</strong> cultural <strong>imperialism</strong>. Islam comes with the mantra that ProphetMuhammad was the greatest and the perfect example <strong>of</strong> human life; Muslims must try to emulate his life,actions and deeds in every detail possible. Muhammad, being an Arab and fountainhead <strong>of</strong> the Islamiccreed—a non-Arab person, by embracing Islam, ideally seeks to mimic the life <strong>of</strong> Muhammad, an Arabo-Islamic overlord. It becomes his life-long mission to become an Arab in lifestyle and Islamic in religiousbelief, forgoing his own cultural and civilizational values, precepts, and practices. Sir VS Naipaul met oneMr. Jaffrey—a British educated Journalist, living in Tehran. Born and educated in Lukhnow (India), Mr.Jaffrey, a Shiite Muslim, had grown up with the dream <strong>of</strong> "jame towhidi, the society <strong>of</strong> the believers", a dream<strong>of</strong> re-creating the culture and society <strong>of</strong> the earliest days <strong>of</strong> Islam, founded by Prophet Muhammad in Medina.In his dream <strong>of</strong> living such a life, he quit Hindu-dominated India in 1948 for Pakistan. Not satisfied with theSunni Muslim society and its treatment <strong>of</strong> Shiites, he moved to Shiite Iran, where he worked in the Englishlanguagedaily, Tehran Times. He was disappointed again, because ‘Iran under the Shah was a tyranny, andthe great wealth when it came led to corruption and sodomy and general wickedness.’ 370 Then there came theIslamic revolution, something Mr. Jaffrey could be delighted about. Iran under the Ayatollahs, ruling as thespiritual and political sovereign in the fashion <strong>of</strong> the Prophet, was closest to the jame towhidi Mr. Jaffrey hadbeen dreaming for. Such a dream is rather universal amongst pious Muslims, the so-called fundamentalists,everywhere, the West included.Behind Mr. Jaffrey’s story lies a very fundamental Muslim urge: that is, how far a Muslim, highlytrained in Western secular education, is willing to go in order to live an Arabo-Islamic religious, social,cultural and political life, forgoing his ancestral culture and tradition. Of the Arab cultural hegemony imposedby Islam on the conquered and converted peoples, Anwar Shaikh writes: 371…it becomes the duty <strong>of</strong> all converts to Islam that they must accept the Arab cultural hegemony,that is, subordinate all their national institutions to those <strong>of</strong> Arabia, adopt Islamic law, learn367. Nehru J (1989) Glimpses <strong>of</strong> World History, Oxford University Press, Delhi, p. 222368. Crone P & Cook M (1977) Hagarism: The Making <strong>of</strong> the Islamic World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,p. VIII369. Ibn Warraq, p. 198370. Naipaul VS (1998) Beyond Belief: The Islamic Incursions among the Converted Peoples, Random House, NewYork, p. 144–45371. Shaikh A (1998) Islam: The Arab Imperialism, The Principality Publishers, Cardiff, Chapter 7125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!