12.07.2015 Views

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Arab–Islamic ImperialismThe pre-Muslim past <strong>of</strong> India was just a caboodle <strong>of</strong> decay, superstition, inequality, and oppression.Nothing credible or worthy ever took place within her boundaries. It was Islam that brought all thatIndians could boast <strong>of</strong> with pride as the positives <strong>of</strong> their civilization: the Sufis, kebab, ghazals, 344religious devotion, human brotherhood, and <strong>of</strong> course Amir Khasrau. Did Arabia not wallow in thedarkness <strong>of</strong> incompetent ignorance till the light <strong>of</strong> Islam brought her to the threshold <strong>of</strong> culture? 345When the same historians write about the British rule in India, they find it to be the darkest period in India’shistory—a period <strong>of</strong> tyranny, oppression and extreme exploitation—with the sole aim <strong>of</strong> plunder andeconomic extraction for swelling the British c<strong>of</strong>fer.This Islam the benefactor view <strong>of</strong> history writing is widespread globally, as notes Ibn Warraq: ‘Openany modern introductory book on Islam and the chances are you will find that it begins by singing the praise<strong>of</strong> a people who conquered, in an incredibly short period, half the civilized world—<strong>of</strong> a people whoestablished an empire that stretched from the banks <strong>of</strong> the Indus in the East to the shores <strong>of</strong> the Atlantic in theWest. The volume will recount in positively glowing terms a time when Muslims ruled over a vast population<strong>of</strong> diverse peoples and cultures.’ 346 Pundit Jawaharlal Nehru, for example, writes on the spread <strong>of</strong> Islam: ‘TheArabs… in a fine frenzy <strong>of</strong> enthusiasm and with a dynamic energy, had spread out and conquered from Spainto the borders <strong>of</strong> Mongolia, carrying with them a brilliant culture…’ 347 No historian can get away with sucheffusive eulogy <strong>of</strong> the vast empires <strong>of</strong> Cyrus and Alexander the Great <strong>of</strong> the ancient world, much less so <strong>of</strong>the European empires <strong>of</strong> the more recent past.When modern historians cover the history <strong>of</strong> European colonial empires, the British and the Frenchones for example, they are invariably described in extremely negative, indeed derogatory, terms. Those arenarrated as a period <strong>of</strong> terrible exploitation, injustice, and misery brought upon the colonized people by theirforeign masters. European rules overseas are invariably labeled as colonialist or imperialist, which carries ashameful, degrading and negative connotation. If a British historian were to paint the picture <strong>of</strong> the Britishcolonial rule in a positive light with beneficial consequences, he/she would be pilloried, ridiculed andcastigated to the extreme.Intriguingly, the great majority <strong>of</strong> people <strong>of</strong> the world, including those on whom the Islamic rule wasbrutally imposed by foreign Muslim invaders, have rarely heard <strong>of</strong> anything called Islamic <strong>imperialism</strong> orcolonialism. Muslims, and even a large majority <strong>of</strong> the non-Muslims <strong>of</strong> the subcontinent, will neither believenor agree that the long period <strong>of</strong> Islamic hegemony over a vast area <strong>of</strong> the world, including their own country,can be rightly called <strong>imperialism</strong> or colonialism. The Arab, Persian, Turk and Berber Muslim invadersconquered many nations and imposed Islamic rule permanently in most instances. Muslims never considerthese Muslim rules in foreign lands to be imperial or colonial in nature. The PBS documentary on Islamichistory, widely used as teaching materials in American schools, calls the vast empire that Islam had foundedto be an empire <strong>of</strong> faith, not a colonial empire.As discussed in the previous chapter, Muslims believe that Islamic conquests were meant for humaneand charitable reasons. Islamic conquerors came, they hold, never to exploit but with the purpose <strong>of</strong> liberatingthe masses from the tyranny and oppression <strong>of</strong> incumbent rulers; they came for integrating with the nativesand for enriching and nourishing the conquered nations in the fields <strong>of</strong> economics, culture, arts, education andscience. In India, the Muslim rulers imported the one true faith—a religion <strong>of</strong> "social equality and justice" asits core value and things that apparently had never existed. The founding father <strong>of</strong> Pakistan, Muhammad AliJinnah, demanded this in a speech addressed to the American people in February 1948: ‘‘It (Islam) has taught344. ghazals are a kind <strong>of</strong> song345. Sharma, p. 111346. Ibn Warraq, p. 198347. Nehru (1946), p. 222116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!