12.07.2015 Views

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Islamic Jihadnecessitated by the fact that Timur left Delhi after his barbarous invasion declaring himself the emperor <strong>of</strong>India and placing the Sayyids at the throne. Realizing the threat <strong>of</strong> brutal Timur and the importance <strong>of</strong> hisapproval, the Sayyid sultans recognized Timur and his successors as the caliph and sent tribute to the Timuridcapital <strong>of</strong> Samarkhand. According to Ferishtah, the first Sayyid Sultan Khizr Khan, ‘held the government forTeimoor (Timur), in whose name he caused the coins to be struck, and the Khootba (prayer sermon) to beread. After the death <strong>of</strong> Teimoor, Khootba was read in the name <strong>of</strong> his successor, Shahrokh Mirza; to whomhe sometimes even sent tribute…’ 365 The Islamic overlordship <strong>of</strong> the Delhi Sultanate moved to Samarkhand,not abolished. Akbar the Great (r. 1556–1605)—as powerful as any other Muslim ruler: Ottoman or Persian—later declared his independence from foreign overlordship. Therefore, from 712 to early sixteenth century, theMuslim-ruled part <strong>of</strong> India was basically a province <strong>of</strong> the wider Islamic world.Besides sending revenue and gifts to the caliphal headquarters <strong>of</strong> Damascus, Baghdad, Cairo orSamarkand from India, Islam’s holy cities <strong>of</strong> Mecca and Medina amongst others also received generousdonations in money, gifts and presents even in the Mughal period, when the Indian rulers had declared theirindependence from foreign overlords. Emperor Babur (r. 1525–30) in his autobiography records the gifts andpresents he had sent "in the cause <strong>of</strong> God" to the holy men <strong>of</strong> Samarkhand, Khurasan, Mecca and Medina. Inone place, he wrote, ‘‘We gave one Shahrukhi (coin) for every soul in the country <strong>of</strong> Kabul and the vale-side<strong>of</strong> Varsak, man and woman, bonded and free, <strong>of</strong> age or non-age.’’ Even apostate Akbar showed generositytoward the city <strong>of</strong> Mecca and Medina as records Humayun Nama: ‘‘Though debarred from leaving Hindustanhimself, he helped many others to fulfil this primary duty <strong>of</strong> their faith (Hajj), and opened wide his purse fortheir expenses. Each year, he named a leader <strong>of</strong> the caravan and provided him with gifts and ample funds forthe two cities. When Gulbadan Begum, his paternal aunt, went to Hajj, sultan Khawja took among otherpresents 12,000 dresses <strong>of</strong> honor.’’ Mughal Emperor Akbar (r. 1556–1605), Jahangir (r. 1605–27) andShahjahan (r. 1628–58) used to send subsistence to the religious men <strong>of</strong> Persia, Rum (Constantinople) andAzerbaijan as allowance "from God’" for "His servants", be they in Hindustan or any other Muslim countries.Emperor Shahjahan also used to send expensive gifts to Mecca. 366This is how the money and resources, extracted from the sweat and toil <strong>of</strong> non-Muslim subjects <strong>of</strong>India, used to be siphoned to the treasuries <strong>of</strong> the Islamic caliphate in Damascus, Baghdad, Cairo or Tashkent,to the Islamic holy cities <strong>of</strong> Mecca and Medina, and to the pockets <strong>of</strong> the Muslim holy men throughout theIslamic world. At the same time, the infidels <strong>of</strong> India were being reduced to awful misery.It is a well-documented, but deliberately ignored, paradigm that Muslim conquests, from the time <strong>of</strong>Prophet Muhammad, were intended for plundering and looting the wealth and resources <strong>of</strong> the conqueredpeople. The second purpose was to capture slaves, predominantly the women and children, who wereconverted to Islam and sold to Muslim owners and employed in all manner <strong>of</strong> menial servitude in thehouseholds <strong>of</strong> their Muslim masters (see Chapter VII on Slavery). The young and beautiful female captivesbecame sex-slaves in the harem and households <strong>of</strong> rulers, generals, nobles and common Muslims. Theyserved triple purposes: firstly, they provided labor for the comfort <strong>of</strong> their Muslim master; secondly, theyserved the master sexual pleasures; and thirdly, they acted as breeding tools for swelling the Muslimpopulace. The third purpose <strong>of</strong> the Muslim conquest <strong>of</strong> foreign lands was to impose the grinding jizyah,kharaj and other sundry taxes upon the vanquished people and a part <strong>of</strong> the revenue went to the centraltreasury.Prophet Muhammad set a paradigm <strong>of</strong> conquest and the expansion <strong>of</strong> Islamic rule, whereby he usedto conquer foreign lands by aggressive threats or violent attacks. Once a foreign land or community has beendefeated, their wealth and treasures were invariably looted and one-fifth <strong>of</strong> the plunder went to state treasury,belonging to Allah and his Prophet, handled by the latter. When a community <strong>of</strong>fered resistance, such as BanuQuraiza or Khaybar, after defeating them, he slaughtered their grown up men en masse and enslaved thewomen and children. The Prophet imposed taxes, namely kharaj (land-tax, tribute) and jizyah (poll-tax), onthe conquered people. The revenue was remitted to the treasury overseen by him. After Muhammad’s death,365. Ferishtah, Vol. I, p. 295; Lal (1999), p. 210366. Lal (1999), p. 212123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!