12.07.2015 Views

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Islamic Jihadon the memory <strong>of</strong> the noble Prophet, by proclaiming in explicit terms that <strong>slavery</strong> is reprobated by their faithand discountenanced by their code.’ 890 Joining the tune <strong>of</strong> these Muslim apologists, Lewis argues: ‘TheIslamic law and practice, from an early stage, severely restricted the enslavement <strong>of</strong> free persons… limiting itin effect to the non-Muslims captured or conquered in a war.’ 891Those scholars, who claim that Islam categorically forbid the primitive practice <strong>of</strong> <strong>slavery</strong>, shouldpay attention to the words <strong>of</strong> Allah in Quranic verses 16:71, 16:76 and 30:28, which unequivocally andcategorically state the division <strong>of</strong> human race into masters and slaves as natural, as His grace, and as part <strong>of</strong>His design. Iqbal and Ali should take note <strong>of</strong> the fact that Prophet Muhammad had owned no slaves prior totaking up the Islamic mission; and at the time <strong>of</strong> his death, he owned dozens <strong>of</strong> slaves and a few concubines,the majority <strong>of</strong> whom were obtained through brutal raids and attacks on innocent communities. Sikaingashould not forget that, in Islamic thought, the Quran is the final words <strong>of</strong> the Creator <strong>of</strong> the Universe in allmatters; and therefore, whatever the Quran sanctions becomes the eternal law for the Islamic society. Thisfundamental position <strong>of</strong> Islam contradicts Sikainga’s assertion that <strong>slavery</strong> is no "specific legal formulations"in Islam. In reality, <strong>slavery</strong> in Islam is a fundamental institution, repeatedly reiterated by Allah and widelypracticed by Prophet Muhammad, which would stand unaltered until the end <strong>of</strong> the world. Furthermore, it isequally nonsensical and inexcusable to term the division <strong>of</strong> fundamentally equal human beings into mastersand slaves as a formulation <strong>of</strong> “ethical nature” as Sikainga puts it. More so is the repeated Quranic sanction <strong>of</strong>violent enslavement <strong>of</strong> women for reducing them into sex-slaves.Gulam Ahmad Parwez (d. 1983), another Muslim scholar and activist <strong>of</strong> the subcontinent, uses adeceptive ploy <strong>of</strong> different kind. He argues that ‘those whom your right hand possesses’ in Quran 47:4,referring to slaves, should be read in the past tense; that is, as ‘those whom your right hand possessed.’ Thisway, he argues, <strong>slavery</strong> belonged to the past and the Quran closed ‘the door to future <strong>slavery</strong>.’ 892 Muslimsshould probably follow this crooked ploy and read the instructions <strong>of</strong> the Quran regarding prayers, fasting,pilgrimage and everything else in the past tense and relegate Islam to the dustbin <strong>of</strong> history.Prophet Muhammad relocated from Mecca to Medina in 622, when he had only about 200–250converts: from Mecca and Medina combined. With this small group <strong>of</strong> followers, he formed a raiding brigandexpressly for the purpose <strong>of</strong> attacking caravans from Mecca to plunder them for booty. As his power grew, hescaled up his adventures by attacking the Pagan, Jewish and Christian communities that came within his reachand power for the purpose <strong>of</strong> plundering and capture <strong>of</strong> slaves. After Muhammad’s death in 632, thisunconditional war on the infidels continued with greater vigor as Muslim power grew in leaps and bounds.They started undertaking campaigns <strong>of</strong> massive scales eventually bringing down world’s great powers: Persia,Byzantium and India. They <strong>of</strong>ten enslaved in tens to hundreds <strong>of</strong> thousands in a single campaign, besidesputting large numbers <strong>of</strong> the vanquished non-Muslims to the sword.At the advent <strong>of</strong> Islam, Prophet Muhammad’s raiding and warring brigand, consisting <strong>of</strong> just a fewhundred neo-Muslim Bedouins <strong>of</strong> Arabia, declared an aggressive, unconditional and relentless holy war onthe rest <strong>of</strong> humanity with the intention to subjugate and enslave them. Those like Lewis, who think that Islam"categorically forbade" or "severely restricted" the enslavement <strong>of</strong> a free man, should realize that Islam calledfor the unrestrained subjugation and enslavement <strong>of</strong> all free men and women <strong>of</strong> the globe at the hands <strong>of</strong> afew hundred Bedouin Arab raiders and plunderers. The Islamic legislation <strong>of</strong> enslavement is not <strong>of</strong> "severelyrestricted" nature, but <strong>of</strong> the highest scale imaginable, unprecedented in the history <strong>of</strong> mankind. The soldiers<strong>of</strong> Islam have executed this divine command with aplomb; the history <strong>of</strong> Islam has been the witness to that.By any standard, the sanction <strong>of</strong> <strong>slavery</strong> in Islam was the most devastating blow to the spirit and dignity <strong>of</strong> thefree human being.890. Ali SA (1891) The Life and Teachings <strong>of</strong> Muhammed, WH Allen, London, p. 380891. Lal (1994), p. 206892. Parwez GA (1989) Islam, a Challenge to Religion, Islamic Book Service, New Delhi, p. 345–46251

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!