12.07.2015 Views

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Islamic Imperialism in Indiadefeated and captured in his first attack. Despite his many brutal attacks on the northern borders <strong>of</strong> India,involving mass murder, enslavement, plunder and pillage, Prithviraj Chauhan forgave and honorably releasedthe aggressor without inflicting any punishment or humiliation. Within a few months, Ghauri regrouped andattacked Prithviraj again defeating the chivalrous Hindu King. 483 Muhammad Ghauri repaid Prithviraj’searlier generosity by pulling out his eyes before killing him. 484Further evidence <strong>of</strong> the contrast between the Hindu and Muslim codes <strong>of</strong> war comes fromFerishtah’s narration <strong>of</strong> Deccan Sultan Muhammad Shah’s attack against King Krishna Ray <strong>of</strong> Vijaynagarkingdom in 1366. Muhammad Shah had vowed to slaughter 100,000 infidels in the attack and ‘the massacre<strong>of</strong> the unbelievers was renewed in so relentless a manner that pregnant women and children at the breasteven did not escape the sword,’ records Ferishtah. 485 The Muslim army in a treacherous surprise-attack putKrishna Ray on the flight and 10,000 <strong>of</strong> his soldiers were slain. Muhammad Shah’s ‘thirst for vengeancebeing still unsatisfied, he commanded the inhabitants <strong>of</strong> every place around Vijaynagar to be massacred,’records Ferishtah.Krishna Ray dispatched ambassadors to make peace, which Muhammad Shah refused. Thereupon,one <strong>of</strong> the Sultan’s favorite advisor reminded him that ‘he had only sworn to slaughter one hundred thousandHindus, and not to destroy their race altogether.’ The sultan replied that ‘twice the number required by thisvow might have been slain,’ yet he was neither willing to make peace nor spare the subjects. 486 This meansthat nearly 200,000 people were slaughtered in this campaign. The ambassadors were, at length, able toconclude peace by paying a large sum <strong>of</strong> money on the spot and pleaded with the Sultan to let them speak.According to Ferishtah, ‘Being permitted to speak, they observed that no religion required the innocent to bepunished for the crimes <strong>of</strong> the guilty (kings), more especially helpless women and children: if Krishn Ray hadbeen in fault, the poor and feeble inhabitants had not been accessory to his errors. Mahomed Shah repliedthat decrees <strong>of</strong> Providence (i.e., from Allah such as in Quran 9:5 to slaughter the idolaters) had been orderedwhat had been done, and that he had no power to alter them.’ At length, the ambassadors were able to rouse ahumane sense in Muhammad Shah, as adds Ferishtah, ‘(he) took an oath that he would not, hereafter, put todeath a single enemy after a victory, and would bind his successors to observe the same line <strong>of</strong> conduct.’ 487On the contrast between the Hindu and Islamic codes <strong>of</strong> war, John Jones observes: ‘It is a curious fact that thehideous and bloody monster <strong>of</strong> religious intolerance was hardly known in India until, first the followers <strong>of</strong>Mohammed and secondly, the disciples <strong>of</strong> the meek and lowly Jesus (i.e. Portuguese), began to invade theland.’ 488 Arthur Schopenhauer (d. 1860), one <strong>of</strong> the greatest nineteenth-century philosophers, narrates thesordid tale <strong>of</strong> the Islamic invasion <strong>of</strong> India as follows: '...the endless persecutions, the religious wars, thatsanguinary frenzy <strong>of</strong> which the ancients (<strong>of</strong> India) had no conception! The destruction or disfigurement <strong>of</strong> theancient temples and idols, a lamentable, mischievous and barbarous act still bears witness to the monotheisticfury... carried on from Mahmud, the Ghaznevid <strong>of</strong> cursed memory, down to Aurangzeb... We hear nothing <strong>of</strong>this kind in the case <strong>of</strong> the Hindoo.’ 489 English novelist Aldous Huxley (1894–1963), in likening the atrocioushistory <strong>of</strong> Islam with that <strong>of</strong> later Christianity, wrote in Ends and Means:483. Dutt, KG, The Modern Face <strong>of</strong> Ang Kshetra, Tribune India, 17October 1998484. Prithviraj III, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prithviraj_Chauhan485. Ferishtah, Vol. II, p. 195486. Ibid, p. 196–97487. Ibid, p. 197488. Jones JP (1915) India - Its Life and Thought, The Macmillan Company, New York, p. 166489. Saunders TB (1997) The Essays <strong>of</strong> Arthur Schopenhauer: Book I : Wisdom <strong>of</strong> Life, De Young Press, p. 42–43158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!