12.07.2015 Views

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Propagation <strong>of</strong> Islam: By Force or Peacefully?prominent Makassarese leader ‘defiantly declared that he would not bow to Islam even if the rivers flowedwith blood, as long as there were pigs to eat in the forests <strong>of</strong> Bulo-bulo. Miraculously, the story goes, all thepigs disappeared that very night, so the chief and all his men were obliged to convert.’ 315 One would becredulous in the extreme to believe that the pigs disappeared just like that miraculously. What, in actuality,might have led to mass <strong>conversion</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Makassarese is the threat <strong>of</strong> violence or a real war.According Hikayat Banjar, the chronicle <strong>of</strong> Banjarmasin (Indonesia) dating mid-seventeenthcentury, ‘the Islamization <strong>of</strong> Banjarmasin was effectively determined when opposing claimants to the thronedecided on single combat to avoid a civil war.’ 316 This again proves that Muslim rulers <strong>of</strong> Southeast Asiawaged wars for the express purpose <strong>of</strong> converting the subdued people; when they won, <strong>conversion</strong> <strong>of</strong> themasses was a compulsion, not a choice. Based on such examples, argues MC Ricklefs, ‘Conversion by armsmay have occurred (in Java) when a Muslim dignitary defeated a non-Muslim, whereupon the vanquishedand his people would presumably embraced Islam.’ 317The numerous Jihadi expeditions the Malacca and other Sultanates in Southeast Asia embarked uponfor their territorial expansion undoubtedly yielded great multitudes <strong>of</strong> slaves, who generally had to embraceIslam. Enslavement became most extensive in the region after the Muslim capture <strong>of</strong> power. When thePortuguese came to Islamic Southeast Asia, they found it hard to hire men for work on wage, because almostall the people were slaves to one master or another. Persian chronicler Muhammad ibn Ibrahim wrote in 1688that ‘‘It is their custom to rent slaves. They pay the slave a sum <strong>of</strong> money, which he gives to his master, andthen they use the slave for that day for whatever work they wish.’’ Similarly, Portuguese author Joao deBarros wrote in 1563: ‘‘You will not find a native Malay, howsoever poor he be, who will lift on his own backhis own things or those <strong>of</strong> another, however, much he be paid for it. All their work is done by slaves.’’ 318Hwang Chung, a Chinese traveler reported in 1537 that the people <strong>of</strong> Melaka “say that it is better to haveslaves than to have land, because largely slaves are a protection to their masters.” 319 According to Reid,‘many members <strong>of</strong> the slave-owning merchant class had strong roots in the Islamic world, which had a clearbody <strong>of</strong> law on slaves as property.’ 320 This suggests that it is Muslim merchants who had promoted <strong>slavery</strong> inMuslim Southeast Asia so extensively.When Ibn Battutah visited the Samudra Sultanate, the sultan presented to him two slave girls and twomen servants. 321 Battutah also mentions <strong>of</strong> slaves owned by the infidel ruler <strong>of</strong> Mul-Jawa, who entertainedBattutah for three days; one <strong>of</strong> his slaves sacrificed himself with his own hands, says Battutah, ‘for the love <strong>of</strong>him (the ruler).’ 322 This means that <strong>slavery</strong> obviously existed in pre-Islamic Southeast Asia. The citizens <strong>of</strong>the Thai Kingdom had to work for the king for half <strong>of</strong> their time, notes Reid. 323 This was a kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>slavery</strong>,too. In pre-Islamic Southeast Asia, slaves were probably owned by the rulers and high <strong>of</strong>ficials, not bycommon merchants; the latter became widespread under the Muslim rule. Most importantly, slaves owned byMuslims generally had to convert to Islam, which was not the case previously.Raiding non-Muslim territories became a constant phenomenon after Muslim powers wereestablished in Southeast Asia. It was ‘a period <strong>of</strong> Javanese history characterized by almost incessantwarfare,’ says Ricklefs. 324 A substantial part <strong>of</strong> the population, the so-called savages, lived in the hills. Overfive centuries after Muslims came to power in the early fifteenth century, those animist hill peoples315. Ibid, p. 35316. Ibid, p. 124317. Ricklefs MC (1979) Six Centuries <strong>of</strong> Islamization in Java, in N. Levtzion ed., p. 106–07318. Reid (1988), p. 131319. Ibid, p. 129320. Ibid, p. 134321. Gibb, p. 275322. Ibid, p. 277–78323. Reid (1988), p. 132324. Ricklefs in N. Levtzion ed., p. 106106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!