12.07.2015 Views

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Islamic Jihadslaves were also engaged in ‘almost every conceivable function.’ 798 Indeed, almost entire work-force inIslamic Southeast Asia consisted <strong>of</strong> slaves as already noted.Employment in building and construction: One major task Muslim invaders and rulers undertook inconquered lands was the construction <strong>of</strong> outstanding buildings for mosques, minarets, monuments andpalaces. These were intended for declaring the might and glory <strong>of</strong> Islam, overshadowing the achievements <strong>of</strong>the native infidels. According to Chachnama, Qasim, informing <strong>of</strong> the building initiatives undertaken by himin Sindh, wrote to Hajjaj, ‘…the infidels converted to Islam or destroyed. Instead <strong>of</strong> idol temples, mosquesand other places <strong>of</strong> worships have been built, pulpits have been erected…’ 799 Qutbuddin Aibak had startedconstruction <strong>of</strong> the impressive Qwat-ul-Islam (might <strong>of</strong> Islam) mosque in Delhi as early as 1192, more than adecade before establishing Muslim rule in India (1206). According to Ibn Battutah, the site <strong>of</strong> the Qwat-ul-Islam mosque ‘was formerly occupied by an idol temple, and was converted into a mosque on the conquest <strong>of</strong>the city.’ 800 Aibak started the construction <strong>of</strong> the magnificent Qutb Minar—a minaret for announcing theIslamic call to prayers—in Delhi in 1199. The Qutb Minar ‘has no parallel in the land <strong>of</strong> Islam,’ wroteeyewitness Battutah. 801The undertaking <strong>of</strong> these huge ventures in India, ahead <strong>of</strong> establishing a firm foothold for Islam,affirms that the declaration <strong>of</strong> the might and glory <strong>of</strong> Islam was an urgent and focal mission <strong>of</strong> the conquest.To undermine and degrade the achievements <strong>of</strong> the infidels further, materials from destroyed temples,churches, synagogues etc. were used in the construction <strong>of</strong> Islamic structures. A Persian inscription on theQwat-ul-Islam mosque testifies that materials from twenty-seven destroyed Hindu and Jain temples were usedin its construction. 802 Similar materials were used in the construction <strong>of</strong> Qutb Minar, about which, writes Pr<strong>of</strong>.Habibullah, ‘the sculptured figures (<strong>of</strong> Hindu gods, goddesses etc.) on the stones being either defaced orconcealed by turning them upside down.’ 803Muslim invaders <strong>of</strong> India started with the building <strong>of</strong> such magnificent mosques, minarets, citadels,and mausoleums <strong>of</strong> their religious significance; to these, they later added outstanding palaces and otherbuildings across India. Their constructions were <strong>of</strong>ten completed in double-quick time. In excessiveenthusiasm, Barani informs us that a palace could be built in two to three days and a citadel in two weeksduring Sultan Alauddin Khilji. Although an exaggeration, it nonetheless tells us that a large number <strong>of</strong> people,invariably slaves, were employed in these works <strong>of</strong> great endeavor; and they had to work under tremendouspressure to complete those ventures in the quickest <strong>of</strong> time in that non-technological era. It is little wonderthen that Sultan Alauddin had accumulated 70,000 slaves, who worked continuously in buildings. Qwat-ul-Islam mosque and Qutb Minar were projects <strong>of</strong> great endeavor, since materials from destroyed temples had tobe dismantled with great care for reusing them. Nizami records that the temples were demolished usingelephants, each <strong>of</strong> which could haul a stone, for which 500 men would be needed. Much <strong>of</strong> the delicate work,however, was done by human hands and a large number <strong>of</strong> slaves must have been employed. 804Furthermore, there was little respite in building new cities, palaces and religious structures. Many<strong>of</strong>ten, after a new Sultan ascended the throne—happened frequently because <strong>of</strong> ceaseless uprisings andintrigues, which so characterized the Islamic rule in India—he would construct a new city and palace in orderto leave an enduring <strong>legacy</strong> <strong>of</strong> his own. Abandoning Iltutmish’s old city, Sultan Ghiysuddin Balban (r. 1265–798. Reid A (1993) The Decline <strong>of</strong> Slavery in Nineteenth-Century Indonesia, In Klein MA ed., Breaking the Chains:Slavery, Bondage and Emancipation in Modern Africa and Asia, University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin Press, Madison, p. 68799. Sharma, p. 95800. Gibb, p. 195801. Ibid802. Watson and Hero, p. 96803. Lal (1994), p. 84804. Ibid, p. 84–85229

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!