12.07.2015 Views

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Islamic Jihadthe Police Station was also shot at. Muslims also started attacking the Hindu villages in the outskirt <strong>of</strong> Delhi,burning them down. These unremitting provocations—in the context <strong>of</strong> what had transpired since the DirectAction and what was happening to the helpless Hindus (and Sikhs) on the Pakistan side—ended restraint <strong>of</strong>the Hindus <strong>of</strong> Delhi. They started attacking and murdering Muslims, who, although found armed, wereoutnumbered; their houses were sometimes burned down. Police had recovered from Muslim houses anumber <strong>of</strong> unlicensed guns, daggers and knives, 154 bombs, forty-five mortars, 1,950 rounds <strong>of</strong> rifleammunition, thirteen wireless transmitters, a number <strong>of</strong> hand-grenades, Sten-gun cartridges and chemicals.According to police records, 507 Muslims perished in the violence with seventy-six Hindu deaths; probablyequal numbers went unreported. 579Premeditated ethnic cleansing <strong>of</strong> Hindus and SikhsThe violence during the Partition <strong>forced</strong> nearly twenty million people to cross the border: Hindus and Sikhsfrom Pakistan to India and Muslims from India to Pakistan. The Muslim League, it appears, not only wanted aseparate homeland, they also wanted it purely for Muslims, cleansed <strong>of</strong> the infidels: Hindus and Sikhs. Theviolence they perpetrated during the course <strong>of</strong> the Partition, it appears, was a premeditated stratagem,carefully orchestrated by the Muslim League, to ethnically cleanse the non-Muslims from Pakistan. OnMuslim League’s incitement <strong>of</strong> the ethnic-cleansing <strong>of</strong> non-Muslims, the Times <strong>of</strong> London wrote, ‘League’sreckless propaganda causes Punjab tragedy.’ 580 The incitement and demagoguery <strong>of</strong> Jinnah and other topMuslim League leaders, argue Collins and Lapierre, convinced Muslims that ‘in Pakistan, the Land <strong>of</strong> thePure, Hindu moneylenders, shopkeepers and zamindars (Sikh landlords) would disappear… if Pakistan isours, so too are shops, farms, houses and factories <strong>of</strong> the Hindus and Sikhs.’ 581 Collins and Lapierre add: ‘Thecentral Post Office in Lahore was flooded with thousands <strong>of</strong> postcards addressed to the Hindus and Sikhs.They depicted men and women being raped and slaughtered. On the back was the message: ‘This is what ishappening to our Sikh and Hindu brothers and sisters at the hands <strong>of</strong> Muslims when they take over.’ Thesepostcards were part <strong>of</strong> a campaign <strong>of</strong> psychological warfare, conducted by the Muslim League, to createpanic among Sikhs and Hindus.’ 582 An <strong>of</strong>ficer sent a letter, dated 5 September 1947, from the LahoreGovernment House to Governor-General Jinnah, read: ‘‘I am telling everyone that I don’t care how the Sikhscross the border, the great thing is to get rid <strong>of</strong> them as soon as possible. There is still little sign <strong>of</strong> the300,000 Sikhs in Lyallpur moving, but in the end they too will have to go.’’ 583Whether in Calcutta, Noakhali or the Muslim-dominated Districts <strong>of</strong> present-day Pakistan, thepolice—dominated by or exclusively made up <strong>of</strong> Muslims—maintained indifference and even participated inthe vandalism, plunder, arson and killing. It is already noted <strong>of</strong> how Suhrawardy directed the police in theCalcutta riots. Regarding the abetment <strong>of</strong> the Bengal Muslim League government and the police in the DirectAction violence, the words <strong>of</strong> Sher-e-Bangla (Tiger <strong>of</strong> Bengal) AK Fazlul Huq, 584 the CM <strong>of</strong> undividedBengal (1937–43) and later briefly <strong>of</strong> East Pakistan (1954), are worth taking note here. In describing hiseyewitness account <strong>of</strong> the savagery in an address to the Bengal Legislative Assembly on 19 September 1946,he said: ‘‘It seemed …that some modern Nadir Shah had come upon Calcutta and had given up the city torapine, plunder and pillage. Sir, each time I tried to get in touch with police <strong>of</strong>ficers, I was told that I was tocontact the Control Room.’’ His desperate effort to contact the police and government <strong>of</strong>ficials wasunsuccessful. Of the government and police inaction, he added: 585579. Ibid, p. 242–85580. Times <strong>of</strong> London, 19 March 1947581. Collins L & Lapierre D (1975) Freedom at Midnight, Avon, New York, p. 330582. Ibid, p. 249583. Khosla, p. 314584. Fazlul Huq was kicked out <strong>of</strong> the Muslim League in 1940 for advocating for an undivided India.585. Ibid, p. 307181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!