12.07.2015 Views

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Islamic Imperialism in IndiaWhen 8,000 Rajput soldiers were slain in the siege, their women—some say 8,000 in number, who wereordered to be enslaved—embraced death by jumping into fire to avoid dishonor and sexual <strong>slavery</strong>. 457 Asnoted already, Emperor Jahangir wrote that 500,000 to 600,000 people were slaughtered during the combinedrule <strong>of</strong> his father (enlightened kind-hearted Akbar) and his own (1556–1627).The Islamic brutality and savagery in India, begun with the invasion <strong>of</strong> Sindh, continued into thereign <strong>of</strong> the last independent Muslim ruler Tipu Sultan (1750–99), seen as a nationalist "hero" <strong>of</strong> India for hisbrave resistance against the British. According to the History <strong>of</strong> Mysore by Hayavadana Rao, Tipu Sultan hadput 700 men, women and children <strong>of</strong> the Iyengar community <strong>of</strong> Mysore to death on the day <strong>of</strong> Dipavalicelebration in the 1790s; for, the latter had allegedly made a pact with General Harris, the British Governor <strong>of</strong>Madras and Tirumaliyengar. According to Mohibbul Hasan, a Mughal General known by his initialM.M.K.F.G. recorded in his account <strong>of</strong> Tipu Sultan’s life (corrected by Tipu’s son) that the Sultan had killed10,000 Hindus and Christians and enslaved 7,000 <strong>of</strong> them in his wars against Travancore. The enslaved werecarried away to Seringapatam, where they were circumcised, made to eat beef and <strong>forced</strong> to convert toIslam. 458 Muslim chronicler Kirmani in his Nishan-e Haidari records that 70,000 Coorgis were forcefullyconverted to Islam by Tipu Sultan. Some modern historians dispute this as an exaggeration by the author torepresent the Sultan as a champion <strong>of</strong> Islam. 459 Whether the number is correct or not, these modern historianshappily affirm that converting the infidels by the sword was obviously considered glorious even at thesedying days <strong>of</strong> Muslim rule in India.Alain Danielou, in describing the Muslim invasion <strong>of</strong> India, writes: ‘From the time Muslims startedarriving, around 632 AD, the history <strong>of</strong> India becomes a long, monotonous series <strong>of</strong> murders, massacres,spoliations, and destructions. It is, as usual, in the name <strong>of</strong> "a holy war" <strong>of</strong> their faith, <strong>of</strong> their sole God, thatthe barbarians have destroyed civilizations, wiped out entire races.’ Mahmud Ghazni, continues Danielou,‘was an early example <strong>of</strong> Muslim ruthlessness, burning in 1018 the temples <strong>of</strong> Mathura, razing Kanauj to theground and destroying the famous temple <strong>of</strong> Somnath, sacred to all Hindus. His successors were as ruthlessas Ghazni: 103 temples in the holy city <strong>of</strong> Benaras were razed to the ground, its marvelous temples destroyed,its magnificent palaces wrecked.’ Indeed, the policy <strong>of</strong> the Muslim invaders in India ‘seems to have been aconscious systematic destruction <strong>of</strong> everything that was beautiful, holy, refined (to Indians),’ concludesDanielou. 460American historian Will Durant, who thinks that the Muslim conquest <strong>of</strong> India was probably thebloodiest in history, wrote: ‘The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with utmost glee and pride <strong>of</strong>the slaughters <strong>of</strong> Hindus, <strong>forced</strong> <strong>conversion</strong>s, abduction <strong>of</strong> Hindu women and children to slave-markets, andthe destruction <strong>of</strong> temples carried out by the warriors <strong>of</strong> Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions <strong>of</strong>Hindus were converted to Islam by the sword during this period.’ 461 Indeed, this sadistic glorification <strong>of</strong> theIslamic brutality <strong>of</strong> Indian infidels was a common theme in Muslim history writing until the last days <strong>of</strong>Islamic domination. The works <strong>of</strong> Muhammad al-Kufi, al-Biladuri, al-Utbi, Hasan Nizami, Amir Khasrau andZiauddin Barani amongst many others bear the testimony <strong>of</strong> that.The massacre and enslavement <strong>of</strong> the conquered infidels and destruction <strong>of</strong> their religiousinstitutions by Muslim invaders in India have few parallels in history. The Hindu Kush Mountain was namedso because <strong>of</strong> the huge number <strong>of</strong> Hindu slaves from India, caught up in inclement weather, died there whilebeing transported to Islamic Central Asia. According to Ibn Battutah (described in 1333), Hindu Kush 'means"Slayer <strong>of</strong> Indians" (i.e. Hindus), because the slave boys and girls who were brought from India die there in457. Lal KS (1992) The Legacy <strong>of</strong> Muslim Rule in India, Aditya Prakashan, Delhi, p. 266–67458. Hasan M (1971) The History <strong>of</strong> Tipu Sultan, Aakar Books, New Delhi, p. 362–63459. Tippu Sultan, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipu_Sultan460. Danielou, p. 222461. Durant W (1999) The Story <strong>of</strong> Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage, MJF Books, New York, p. 459152

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!