• Consumer preferences –operating costs are only oneconsideration made by consumersin the <strong>vehicle</strong> purchase decisionalongside other factors such assafety, quality, purchase price andreliability; the relative importance<strong>of</strong> each factor varies over time (forexample, fuel economy becomesmore important when fuel pricessuddenly increase), and may notbe ‘economically rational’ (such asthe decision to purchase a <strong>vehicle</strong>with high fuel consumption whenfuel prices show a short-<strong>term</strong>dip despite the long-<strong>term</strong> trendupwards); the availability <strong>of</strong> publiccharging infrastructure has beenidentified as a key influence onconsumer preference towards<strong>electric</strong> <strong>vehicle</strong>s.The variations seen in the economicmodelling can be mostly explainedby the differences in how these keyvariables are forecast to unfold andinteract with each other.According to the <strong>Department</strong>’s model,if both technology and oil pricesfollow forecasts, the take-<strong>of</strong>f point forEV technology mainstream marketadoption is 2020. With referenceto Section 4.1.1, <strong>vehicle</strong> prices aredecreasing slightly ahead <strong>of</strong> forecasts,whereas oil prices are slightly aboveprojections (EIA 2012). This suggeststhat the breakeven year for EVs may beslightly earlier than 2020.Consumer preferences manifestthemselves differently before andafter this take-<strong>of</strong>f point. Before thetake-<strong>of</strong>f point, the early market isdriven primarily by ‘early adopters’ asoutlined in Section 3.2 who purchasethe <strong>vehicle</strong>s for mostly non-financialreasons. This behaviour may bethought <strong>of</strong> as ‘economically irrational’,and by extension not well suited toeconomic modelling. As a result, EVsales predictions differ wildly up totheir predicted take-<strong>of</strong>f point.Once the take-<strong>of</strong>f point has beenreached, the market is effectively‘mainstream’ and more likely tobehave in ‘economically rational’ways. Once this occurs the economicforecasting becomes more reliable,even if consumers may still pursuepurchase preferences which are noteconomically rational.A consideration made in the economicmodelling commissioned by the<strong>Department</strong> relates to Australianmarket <strong>vehicle</strong> supply constraints(AECOM 2011). As was outlined inSections 4.1.3 and 4.1.5, supply <strong>of</strong><strong>vehicle</strong>s into the Australian marketdoes not match that for marketselsewhere. For <strong>electric</strong> <strong>vehicle</strong>technologies this is envisaged to bean issue until around 2020, which hassignificant implications for the salesvolume forecasts prior to this time.A range <strong>of</strong> factors may influence localsupply constraints. Poor sales and/or a perceived lack <strong>of</strong> support mayreduce OEM interest in the Australianmarket, thereby extending the supplyconstraints. Conversely, burgeoningconsumer interest and/or support forlocal manufacture may reduce supplyconstraints. These influences arerelevant to considerations relating tooptimisation <strong>of</strong> the economic benefitsto the state made in Section 6.1.3.A relatively constant influence onconsumer preference is the availability<strong>of</strong> public charging infrastructure.Charging infrastructure availabilitywill not affect the timing <strong>of</strong> the take<strong>of</strong>fpoint for mainstream EV adoption,however it will strongly affect the<strong>vehicle</strong> sales either side <strong>of</strong> this date.This is discussed further in Section6.1.3 below.
6.1.3 What are the costs andbenefits <strong>of</strong> <strong>electric</strong> <strong>vehicle</strong>adoption for Victoria?Under all scenarios, <strong>electric</strong> <strong>vehicle</strong>swill provide a net economic benefitfor Victoria. The benefit varies from$1.8 billion to $23.4 billion over theperiod to 2040, without considering theeconomic contribution <strong>of</strong> the <strong>electric</strong>ityand automotive industry sectors. Oilprices and EV purchase costs arethe key factors driving the timingand extent <strong>of</strong> the economic benefit.Local <strong>vehicle</strong> supply constraintsare an important influence on theeconomic analysis, both in the earlyyears while the <strong>vehicle</strong>s are expensiveand following the point at whichthey become economically viable.The availability <strong>of</strong> public charginginfrastructure has a strong influenceon the size <strong>of</strong> the economic benefitonce EV uptake begins at scale.EVs cost more to purchase initially,but they are cheaper to run thanconventional <strong>vehicle</strong>s. Over time, thepurchase price for EVs is expected t<strong>of</strong>all, and running costs <strong>of</strong> conventional<strong>vehicle</strong>s are likely to increase asoil gets more expensive. Under allscenarios modelled, the EV marketis both economically and financiallystrong with a net present value thatbecomes positive in the period between2026 and 2031. Over the 30-yearevaluation period, economic benefitsto the State range from $1.8 billionto $23.4 billion, mostly as savingsto households and businesses intransport costs.Notably, the modelling does not takeinto account the potentially significanteconomic contributions from <strong>electric</strong><strong>vehicle</strong> market goods or serviceprovision, <strong>electric</strong>ity generation forEV operation, or from local designand/or production <strong>of</strong> EV technology.These contributions may be additionalto existing economic activity, as is thecase with <strong>electric</strong>ity generation, orsimply an evolution, such as design <strong>of</strong><strong>electric</strong> rather <strong>of</strong> internal combustionengine <strong>vehicle</strong>s. Section 6.1.4provides some insights into potentialemployment benefits for the state.The key influences on the modellingpredictions are the same as thosedescribed in Section 6.1.2:• Technology costs – in the shortto medium-<strong>term</strong> take-up <strong>of</strong> EVsis strongly influenced by theirprice relative to conventional<strong>vehicle</strong>s. Measures to reduceEV costs earlier bring forwardthe economic benefits• Oil prices – take-up <strong>of</strong> EVs ishighly sensitive to oil prices butless sensitive to <strong>electric</strong>ity pricesand/or a carbon tax. Should oilprices increase ahead <strong>of</strong> forecasts,measures to promote EV uptakewill increase economic benefits• Consumer preferences –increasing the availability <strong>of</strong>charging infrastructure andremoving barriers to EV ownershipwill encourage take-up <strong>of</strong> EVswhen prices become moreaffordable, and bring forward theeconomic benefits.The economic model finds that in orderto optimise the economic benefit <strong>of</strong>EVs, rapid uptake <strong>of</strong> EVs should bepromoted once the take-<strong>of</strong>f point isreached where the higher purchaseprice <strong>of</strong> an EV (technology costs) ismatched by the operating cost savingsEVs provide versus conventional<strong>vehicle</strong>s (oil prices).An important consideration inpromoting uptake <strong>of</strong> EVs is <strong>vehicle</strong>supply constraints. As outlined inSection 4.1.3, the Australian marketis envisaged to be constrainedto around one per cent <strong>of</strong> globalproduction until 2020 (AECOM 2011).This forecast is beneficial in thecontext <strong>of</strong> the economic analysis, asprior to this time EV uptake occursat a cost to the economy due tothe unfavourable purchase price/operating cost relationship. Followingthe removal <strong>of</strong> supply constraints,uptake is de<strong>term</strong>ined by the factorsabove (technology costs, oil prices andconsumer preferences).It is important to note however thatdue to the leadtime on productplanning decisions (refer to Section4.1.3), automotive OEMs should bemade aware <strong>of</strong> EV market supportmeasures at least two years ahead <strong>of</strong>when improved supply is being soughtto optimise the overall economicbenefit to the state – in other words,around 2018 based upon the forecastscontained in the <strong>Department</strong>’seconomic modelling.CREATING A MARKET 103
- Page 1 and 2:
CREATINGA MARKETVICTORIAN ELECTRICV
- Page 3 and 4:
Measures which reduce electriccar p
- Page 5 and 6:
5.4 Public charging 815.4.1 How muc
- Page 7 and 8:
The trial is a $5 millioninitiative
- Page 9 and 10:
In 2012, Mitsubishi, Nissan,and Hol
- Page 11 and 12:
2.4 HOW DOES ELECTRIC VEHICLECHARGI
- Page 13 and 14:
Meter, Switch orDistribution BoardD
- Page 15 and 16:
It has brought together allthe piec
- Page 17 and 18:
Commercial negotiations and astruct
- Page 19 and 20:
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION CASE STUDYMOBIL
- Page 21 and 22:
RACV considers electricvehicles to
- Page 23 and 24:
What we need from you: The particip
- Page 25 and 26:
Information gained fromthe cars has
- Page 27 and 28:
Alongside differences in utilisatio
- Page 29 and 30:
Evidence suggests that while purcha
- Page 31 and 32:
This sort of functionality is expec
- Page 33 and 34:
4.1.5 What about electriccommercial
- Page 35 and 36:
A clearly positive influence on peo
- Page 37 and 38:
Having to make these considerations
- Page 39 and 40:
Analysis of the vehicle monitoringd
- Page 41 and 42:
4.2.4 How much does it costfor an a
- Page 43 and 44:
Experience from overseas suggeststh
- Page 45 and 46:
In terms of who drives the decision
- Page 47 and 48:
Despite this relative under-utilisa
- Page 49 and 50:
Within the traditional fleet assetm
- Page 51 and 52: CORPORATE CHARGING NETWORK CASE STU
- Page 53 and 54: Nearly 140 household, fleetand publ
- Page 55 and 56: The trial charging infrastructure v
- Page 57 and 58: Through these efforts, trial partic
- Page 59 and 60: To support trip planning and rangem
- Page 61 and 62: 5.2 HOME CHARGING5.2.1 How much doe
- Page 63 and 64: The general process for the househo
- Page 65 and 66: Although this outcome was a success
- Page 67 and 68: The appeal of a financial incentive
- Page 69 and 70: 5.2.5 What do households thinkof el
- Page 71 and 72: It provides guidance on the allocat
- Page 73 and 74: An example of this was theDepartmen
- Page 75 and 76: Based upon the trial experience, th
- Page 77 and 78: WORKPLACE CHARGING CASE STUDYVICTOR
- Page 79 and 80: Workplace charging appears to be ak
- Page 81 and 82: One scenario of particular interest
- Page 83 and 84: Cost data obtained from various sit
- Page 85 and 86: PUBLIC CHARGING CASE STUDYON-STREET
- Page 87 and 88: Household participants were askedab
- Page 89 and 90: The following quote supplied to the
- Page 91 and 92: Despite these challenging figuresan
- Page 93 and 94: According to theory (Lieberman andM
- Page 95 and 96: The pushback by parking operatorsag
- Page 97 and 98: There’s a lot to like aboutincrea
- Page 99 and 100: The economic analysis hasexamined t
- Page 101: Under a ‘mid-range’ scenario as
- Page 105 and 106: 6.2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS6.2.1 How
- Page 107 and 108: Based upon the limited informationa
- Page 109 and 110: 6.3 SOCIAL IMPACTS6.3.1 How is comm
- Page 111 and 112: A key challenge for many electricve
- Page 113 and 114: The effectiveness ofthese initiativ
- Page 115 and 116: The supplementary data andinteracti
- Page 117 and 118: EV PROMOTION CASE STUDYELECTRIC CAR
- Page 119 and 120: In addition to the EV School progra
- Page 121 and 122: 7.1.4 How has the local electricveh
- Page 123 and 124: 7.2 INSIGHTS7.2.1 How do we best te
- Page 125 and 126: ISSUES ANDOPPORTUNITIESA significan
- Page 127 and 128: Issue Classification Sections Oppor
- Page 129 and 130: Issue Classification Sections Oppor
- Page 131 and 132: Drawing upon the learnings acquired
- Page 133 and 134: ACRONYMS,GLOSSARY ANDUNITS OF MEASU
- Page 135 and 136: OPEC - Organisation of the Petroleu
- Page 137 and 138: Actew AGL 2009, History of mobile p
- Page 139 and 140: Ergon 2012, Pool pump connections,
- Page 141 and 142: Smart Grid News 2012, Aussie firm u
- Page 143 and 144: EntityChargingInfrastructureHostCha
- Page 145 and 146: APPENDIX BEVS AND FLEETS 2012 PRACT
- Page 147 and 148: APPENDIX CCHARGING OUTLET ATTRIBUTE
- Page 149 and 150: Area Attribute DefinitionBilling /
- Page 151 and 152: APPENDIX EEV CHARGING COURTESY SIGN