- Page 1 and 2: CREATINGA MARKETVICTORIAN ELECTRICV
- Page 3 and 4: Measures which reduce electriccar p
- Page 5 and 6: 5.4 Public charging 815.4.1 How muc
- Page 7 and 8: The trial is a $5 millioninitiative
- Page 9 and 10: In 2012, Mitsubishi, Nissan,and Hol
- Page 11 and 12: 2.4 HOW DOES ELECTRIC VEHICLECHARGI
- Page 13 and 14: Meter, Switch orDistribution BoardD
- Page 15 and 16: It has brought together allthe piec
- Page 17 and 18: Commercial negotiations and astruct
- Page 19 and 20: TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION CASE STUDYMOBIL
- Page 21: RACV considers electricvehicles to
- Page 25 and 26: Information gained fromthe cars has
- Page 27 and 28: Alongside differences in utilisatio
- Page 29 and 30: Evidence suggests that while purcha
- Page 31 and 32: This sort of functionality is expec
- Page 33 and 34: 4.1.5 What about electriccommercial
- Page 35 and 36: A clearly positive influence on peo
- Page 37 and 38: Having to make these considerations
- Page 39 and 40: Analysis of the vehicle monitoringd
- Page 41 and 42: 4.2.4 How much does it costfor an a
- Page 43 and 44: Experience from overseas suggeststh
- Page 45 and 46: In terms of who drives the decision
- Page 47 and 48: Despite this relative under-utilisa
- Page 49 and 50: Within the traditional fleet assetm
- Page 51 and 52: CORPORATE CHARGING NETWORK CASE STU
- Page 53 and 54: Nearly 140 household, fleetand publ
- Page 55 and 56: The trial charging infrastructure v
- Page 57 and 58: Through these efforts, trial partic
- Page 59 and 60: To support trip planning and rangem
- Page 61 and 62: 5.2 HOME CHARGING5.2.1 How much doe
- Page 63 and 64: The general process for the househo
- Page 65 and 66: Although this outcome was a success
- Page 67 and 68: The appeal of a financial incentive
- Page 69 and 70: 5.2.5 What do households thinkof el
- Page 71 and 72: It provides guidance on the allocat
- Page 73 and 74:
An example of this was theDepartmen
- Page 75 and 76:
Based upon the trial experience, th
- Page 77 and 78:
WORKPLACE CHARGING CASE STUDYVICTOR
- Page 79 and 80:
Workplace charging appears to be ak
- Page 81 and 82:
One scenario of particular interest
- Page 83 and 84:
Cost data obtained from various sit
- Page 85 and 86:
PUBLIC CHARGING CASE STUDYON-STREET
- Page 87 and 88:
Household participants were askedab
- Page 89 and 90:
The following quote supplied to the
- Page 91 and 92:
Despite these challenging figuresan
- Page 93 and 94:
According to theory (Lieberman andM
- Page 95 and 96:
The pushback by parking operatorsag
- Page 97 and 98:
There’s a lot to like aboutincrea
- Page 99 and 100:
The economic analysis hasexamined t
- Page 101 and 102:
Under a ‘mid-range’ scenario as
- Page 103 and 104:
6.1.3 What are the costs andbenefit
- Page 105 and 106:
6.2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS6.2.1 How
- Page 107 and 108:
Based upon the limited informationa
- Page 109 and 110:
6.3 SOCIAL IMPACTS6.3.1 How is comm
- Page 111 and 112:
A key challenge for many electricve
- Page 113 and 114:
The effectiveness ofthese initiativ
- Page 115 and 116:
The supplementary data andinteracti
- Page 117 and 118:
EV PROMOTION CASE STUDYELECTRIC CAR
- Page 119 and 120:
In addition to the EV School progra
- Page 121 and 122:
7.1.4 How has the local electricveh
- Page 123 and 124:
7.2 INSIGHTS7.2.1 How do we best te
- Page 125 and 126:
ISSUES ANDOPPORTUNITIESA significan
- Page 127 and 128:
Issue Classification Sections Oppor
- Page 129 and 130:
Issue Classification Sections Oppor
- Page 131 and 132:
Drawing upon the learnings acquired
- Page 133 and 134:
ACRONYMS,GLOSSARY ANDUNITS OF MEASU
- Page 135 and 136:
OPEC - Organisation of the Petroleu
- Page 137 and 138:
Actew AGL 2009, History of mobile p
- Page 139 and 140:
Ergon 2012, Pool pump connections,
- Page 141 and 142:
Smart Grid News 2012, Aussie firm u
- Page 143 and 144:
EntityChargingInfrastructureHostCha
- Page 145 and 146:
APPENDIX BEVS AND FLEETS 2012 PRACT
- Page 147 and 148:
APPENDIX CCHARGING OUTLET ATTRIBUTE
- Page 149 and 150:
Area Attribute DefinitionBilling /
- Page 151 and 152:
APPENDIX EEV CHARGING COURTESY SIGN