The Energy NetworksAssociation (ENA)appreciates the opportunityto have participated in theVictorian Electric VehicleTrial and has been pleasedwith the results to date. Inparticular, our objectives togain, through participation,a clearer understanding<strong>of</strong> the implications <strong>of</strong> andopportunities from theintroduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>electric</strong><strong>vehicle</strong>s for energy networkshave been largely satisfied.We applaud the VictorianGovernment’s initiativein committing fundingand resources to the <strong>trial</strong>and believe that <strong>electric</strong><strong>vehicle</strong>s have a definite andimportant role in Victoria’stransport andenergy future.Energy Networks Association,8 November 20125.3 FLEET AND WORKPLACECHARGING5.3.1 How much does charginginfrastructure for corporateapplications cost?At around $5,000, charging outlet costsare generally higher than for homecharging due to the preference forincreased functionality and durability.Average charging circuit costs <strong>of</strong>around $2,200 are also slightly higherdue to the increased separationbetween parking locations and points<strong>of</strong> <strong>electric</strong>al supply. However, manyfleets have implemented lower costsolutions drawing upon existinginfrastructure and their own<strong>electric</strong>al tradespeople.Similar to home charging solutions, theentry-level 15A GPO <strong>electric</strong>al outletis likely to cost around $100. Howeverfor most fleets there is a preferencetowards devices with enhanced safety,security and data capture. Based uponthe <strong>trial</strong> experience this translatesto around $4,000-$6,000 for a fairlysophisticated charging outlet, althoughprices are likely to have fallen dueto market competition, economies<strong>of</strong> scale and design/manufacturingprocess improvements.The charging circuit was generallyinstalled at the cost <strong>of</strong> the fleetoperator, ensuring strong interest inidentifying least cost solutions. For thisreason many fleets elected to installthe charging circuit themselves usingexisting infrastructure and/or their own<strong>electric</strong>al tradespeople. A consequence<strong>of</strong> this is a reduction in the cost dataobtained for analysis relative to thesites installed.With reference to Table 12, the averagecost <strong>of</strong> the charging circuit was foundto be slightly higher than for homecharging at around $2,200. While thedifference between the average figuressits well within the standard deviationfor both sets <strong>of</strong> data, there is a $500difference in the median values whichreflects the generally shorter distancethat home charging circuits have totravel between the point <strong>of</strong> <strong>electric</strong>alsupply and the parking/charginglocation. It should be noted that due tothere being more control <strong>of</strong> the designsolution with owner-occupied sites,the missing data from the sites wherethe charging circuit was installed bythe fleet operator is likely to be biasedtowards lower cost solutions.No.INSTALLATIONS14AVERAGE COST $ 2,152MEDIAN COST $ 1,910STD DEV $ 1,279MAX $ 4,382MIN $ 550Table 12. Cost benchmarking <strong>of</strong> the <strong>trial</strong>fleet charging circuits.As for the home charging solutions,sites which necessitated more complexsolutions such as free-standing unitshad the potential to greatly increasecosts. In most cases lower costsolutions were able to be identified,however this <strong>of</strong>ten greatly extendedthe leadtime for the installation oreven resulted in a different sitealtogether serving as the charginglocation for the <strong>vehicle</strong>.
An example <strong>of</strong> this was the<strong>Department</strong>’s own experiencewith its property at 121 ExhibitionSt, Melbourne. The <strong>Department</strong>leases levels 5 to 16 <strong>of</strong> the 36 levelbuilding, along with a portion <strong>of</strong> theunderground car-parking. As part <strong>of</strong>the <strong>trial</strong>, the <strong>Department</strong> requestedpermission to install an <strong>electric</strong><strong>vehicle</strong> charging solution. The buildingmanager proposed a charging circuitbe run from the lowest point <strong>of</strong>metered <strong>electric</strong>al supply billed tothe <strong>Department</strong> on building level 5 tothe nearest underground car-park onbasement level 3. This was de<strong>term</strong>inedto be cost-prohibitive, and despiteextensive negotiations to obtain a costeffectivealternative the proposal had tobe aborted.A charging outlet was instead installedin a nearby property also tenantedby the <strong>Department</strong>, using an unused<strong>electric</strong>ity billing meter thatwas one level away from the nearest<strong>Department</strong> parking location. Thisinstallation cost $4,500, which was stillsignificantly higher than the averagefor a commercial property but muchlower than what was expected underthe alternate arrangement.5.3.2 How is charginginfrastructure installed forcorporate applications?Charging infrastructure for corporateapplications is installed by <strong>electric</strong>alcontractors. Charging circuits can beinstalled by in-house contractors, evenif this is <strong>of</strong>ten done by the chargingservice provider during installation<strong>of</strong> the dedicated <strong>electric</strong> <strong>vehicle</strong>charging outlets. From the time whencommitment to establish EV chargingcapability is made, the averageleadtime to commissioning/handoveris around 10 weeks.Installation <strong>of</strong> <strong>electric</strong> <strong>vehicle</strong>charging infrastructure for corporateapplications is greatly complicated byinternal approval requirements, alongwith the likely involvement <strong>of</strong> a thirdand sometimes fourth party in theproperty management and ownership.As a result, the average leadtime forinstallation <strong>of</strong> a corporate chargingsolution is around 70 days, whichis twice as long as for a homecharging solution.The general process for the installation<strong>of</strong> charging infrastructure for corporateapplications can be seen in Figure 40.AVERAGE / MEDIAN LEADTIME = 73 / 59 DAYSContractnegotiationSite worksplanningSite worksHandoverOperation• Explain deed• Q&A• In-principleagreement• Legal• Notifysub-contractor• Site survey• Report / quote• Signage• Scheduling• Site prep• Site works• Test andcommission• Demonstration • Paymentfor works• Staff training• Reporting• Transition• Sign-<strong>of</strong>f• Works approval• Install signage• Consultation• Ground-markingFigure 40. Schematic <strong>of</strong> the charging infrastructure installation process for commercial property.CREATING A MARKET 73
- Page 1 and 2:
CREATINGA MARKETVICTORIAN ELECTRICV
- Page 3 and 4:
Measures which reduce electriccar p
- Page 5 and 6:
5.4 Public charging 815.4.1 How muc
- Page 7 and 8:
The trial is a $5 millioninitiative
- Page 9 and 10:
In 2012, Mitsubishi, Nissan,and Hol
- Page 11 and 12:
2.4 HOW DOES ELECTRIC VEHICLECHARGI
- Page 13 and 14:
Meter, Switch orDistribution BoardD
- Page 15 and 16:
It has brought together allthe piec
- Page 17 and 18:
Commercial negotiations and astruct
- Page 19 and 20:
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION CASE STUDYMOBIL
- Page 21 and 22: RACV considers electricvehicles to
- Page 23 and 24: What we need from you: The particip
- Page 25 and 26: Information gained fromthe cars has
- Page 27 and 28: Alongside differences in utilisatio
- Page 29 and 30: Evidence suggests that while purcha
- Page 31 and 32: This sort of functionality is expec
- Page 33 and 34: 4.1.5 What about electriccommercial
- Page 35 and 36: A clearly positive influence on peo
- Page 37 and 38: Having to make these considerations
- Page 39 and 40: Analysis of the vehicle monitoringd
- Page 41 and 42: 4.2.4 How much does it costfor an a
- Page 43 and 44: Experience from overseas suggeststh
- Page 45 and 46: In terms of who drives the decision
- Page 47 and 48: Despite this relative under-utilisa
- Page 49 and 50: Within the traditional fleet assetm
- Page 51 and 52: CORPORATE CHARGING NETWORK CASE STU
- Page 53 and 54: Nearly 140 household, fleetand publ
- Page 55 and 56: The trial charging infrastructure v
- Page 57 and 58: Through these efforts, trial partic
- Page 59 and 60: To support trip planning and rangem
- Page 61 and 62: 5.2 HOME CHARGING5.2.1 How much doe
- Page 63 and 64: The general process for the househo
- Page 65 and 66: Although this outcome was a success
- Page 67 and 68: The appeal of a financial incentive
- Page 69 and 70: 5.2.5 What do households thinkof el
- Page 71: It provides guidance on the allocat
- Page 75 and 76: Based upon the trial experience, th
- Page 77 and 78: WORKPLACE CHARGING CASE STUDYVICTOR
- Page 79 and 80: Workplace charging appears to be ak
- Page 81 and 82: One scenario of particular interest
- Page 83 and 84: Cost data obtained from various sit
- Page 85 and 86: PUBLIC CHARGING CASE STUDYON-STREET
- Page 87 and 88: Household participants were askedab
- Page 89 and 90: The following quote supplied to the
- Page 91 and 92: Despite these challenging figuresan
- Page 93 and 94: According to theory (Lieberman andM
- Page 95 and 96: The pushback by parking operatorsag
- Page 97 and 98: There’s a lot to like aboutincrea
- Page 99 and 100: The economic analysis hasexamined t
- Page 101 and 102: Under a ‘mid-range’ scenario as
- Page 103 and 104: 6.1.3 What are the costs andbenefit
- Page 105 and 106: 6.2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS6.2.1 How
- Page 107 and 108: Based upon the limited informationa
- Page 109 and 110: 6.3 SOCIAL IMPACTS6.3.1 How is comm
- Page 111 and 112: A key challenge for many electricve
- Page 113 and 114: The effectiveness ofthese initiativ
- Page 115 and 116: The supplementary data andinteracti
- Page 117 and 118: EV PROMOTION CASE STUDYELECTRIC CAR
- Page 119 and 120: In addition to the EV School progra
- Page 121 and 122: 7.1.4 How has the local electricveh
- Page 123 and 124:
7.2 INSIGHTS7.2.1 How do we best te
- Page 125 and 126:
ISSUES ANDOPPORTUNITIESA significan
- Page 127 and 128:
Issue Classification Sections Oppor
- Page 129 and 130:
Issue Classification Sections Oppor
- Page 131 and 132:
Drawing upon the learnings acquired
- Page 133 and 134:
ACRONYMS,GLOSSARY ANDUNITS OF MEASU
- Page 135 and 136:
OPEC - Organisation of the Petroleu
- Page 137 and 138:
Actew AGL 2009, History of mobile p
- Page 139 and 140:
Ergon 2012, Pool pump connections,
- Page 141 and 142:
Smart Grid News 2012, Aussie firm u
- Page 143 and 144:
EntityChargingInfrastructureHostCha
- Page 145 and 146:
APPENDIX BEVS AND FLEETS 2012 PRACT
- Page 147 and 148:
APPENDIX CCHARGING OUTLET ATTRIBUTE
- Page 149 and 150:
Area Attribute DefinitionBilling /
- Page 151 and 152:
APPENDIX EEV CHARGING COURTESY SIGN