12.07.2015 Views

victorian electric vehicle trial mid-term report - Department of Transport

victorian electric vehicle trial mid-term report - Department of Transport

victorian electric vehicle trial mid-term report - Department of Transport

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PUBLIC CHARGING CASE STUDYON-STREET CHARGING STATIONS IN MELBOURNE CBDIn 2010 City <strong>of</strong> Melbourne agreed to provide up to 12 on-street parking bays in Melbourne’s CBD for exclusive useas <strong>electric</strong> <strong>vehicle</strong> parking/charging locations for the duration <strong>of</strong> the <strong>trial</strong>. This commitment has underpinned aninvestigation into the process, timelines, obstacles and opportunities for on-street charging stations.Initial attempts to identify suitable sites were confounded by the limited information available about theunderground cables, pipes etc. that may enable/inhibit establishment <strong>of</strong> <strong>electric</strong>al infrastructure. A key inputinto site selection is the location <strong>of</strong> convenient points <strong>of</strong> <strong>electric</strong>al supply, as this has a large bearing on theexcavation/structural works and with this the project costs. This information was possible to obtain through:(i)Formal applications to the <strong>electric</strong>ity network operator in response to detailed works plans (a large andcostly commitment at the site identification stage), or(ii) Informal dialog with the <strong>electric</strong>ity network operator via their representative taking part in the <strong>trial</strong> projectmeetings (who agreed to investigate a number <strong>of</strong> regions <strong>of</strong> around 300 metres diameter as an in-kindcontribution to the <strong>trial</strong>), or(iii) On-the-ground site surveys to identify potential sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>electric</strong>al supply (signified most <strong>of</strong>tenby the presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>electric</strong>al man-hole covers/pits, or above-ground ventilation stacks forunderground substations).As a starting point for the <strong>trial</strong> site identification, an informal request was supplied to the <strong>electric</strong>ity networkoperator for information about relevant underground <strong>electric</strong>al infrastructure within a 300 metre radius <strong>of</strong> sixlocations <strong>of</strong> interest. These locations were selected to coincide with fleet EV operator parking preferences, whichwould help ensure site utilisation. In response to this request a mark-up map was supplied <strong>of</strong> potentially relevant<strong>electric</strong>al infrastructure in each area. On-the-ground site surveys eliminated all but one site, primarily due to thenetwork infrastructure not aligning with the parking and/or traffic arrangements. Criminal damage risks,for example due to the proximity <strong>of</strong> a late-night entertainment venue, were also an influence on the site review.One preferred location was taken forwards initially via an application by the charging service provider for anexemption from Energy Safe Victoria under the Electrical Safety Act 2000. The exemption was granted partlydue to the agreement with City <strong>of</strong> Melbourne for the provision <strong>of</strong> on-street parking/charging locations asan in-kind contribution to the <strong>trial</strong>. Having gained the exemption, the charging service provider developed adetailed works plan in consultation with the <strong>electric</strong>ity network operator. Despite the preliminary site surveysundertaken above, the detailed works plan was costed at around $30,000 for a single standard charging outlet,in addition to which complications were identified in relation to some heritage-listed trees in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> thesite. At this point a decision was made to not proceed with this site.Separate and subsequent to the experience above, a new site was identified in partnership with a corporatesponsor who was seeking a highly visible location outside <strong>of</strong> their <strong>of</strong>fices to showcase their branded <strong>electric</strong><strong>vehicle</strong>s. Having secured the supplementary funding commitment along with a minimum-level site utilisation,a decision to proceed with the preliminary works plan and approvals processes was made in May 2012.A similar process to that outlined above was undertaken by a <strong>trial</strong> charging service provider. An exemptionapproval was obtained from Energy Safe Victoria, following which a detailed works plan was developed. Thedetailed works plan drew on input supplied by the <strong>electric</strong>ity network operator, confirming the adequacy <strong>of</strong><strong>electric</strong>al supply and outlining the proposed method <strong>of</strong> connection to the network. At this point the projectproposal costs were estimated at around $20,000.The detailed works plan was then lodged with City <strong>of</strong> Melbourne for a planning approval. The initial reviewreturned an approval in-principle for the parking reassignment, along with a request for further information.The main risk issues discerned by council as needing to be addressed were:• Tripping hazard from the charging cable• Cyclist hazard from the charging plug protruding from the <strong>vehicle</strong>• Shock hazard potential.As <strong>of</strong> January 2013 discussions were still underway regarding the risk assessment submission– eight months from when the detailed works planning process was initiated.Indications from City <strong>of</strong> Melbourne are that works are generally scheduled to occur aroundeight weeks from when the planning approval is finalised.CREATING A MARKET 85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!