victorian electric vehicle trial mid-term report - Department of Transport

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPENDIX AVICTORIAN ELECTRIC VEHICLETRIAL CORPORATE PARTICIPANTSParticipation in the trial is underpinned by a formal contract for each participant. Various other organisations not listed belowhave engaged to varying degrees over the life of the project however these interactions have not involved a formal agreement.An explanation of what each participant role constitutes can be found at the foot of the table.EntityChargingInfrastructureHostChargingInfrastructureProviderFleetOperatorPremierPartnerServiceProviderTrialParticipantVehicleSupplierAECOMxAGL Energy x x xAustin HealthBayside City CouncilxxBetter Place Australia x xCardinia Shire CouncilCentre for Education andResearch in EnvironmentalStrategies (CERES)Cloud Utilityx x xxxChargePoint Australia x xCitiPower x xCSIRO x x xCity of CaseyCity of FranksonxxCity of Greater Dandenong x xCity of KingstonCity of MaribyrnongxxCity of Melbourne x xCity of MeltonCity of Port PhillipCity of MonashxxxClub Assist x x xColonial First State GlobalAsset ManagementxDiUS Computing x xDolomiti Italian LifestylexECOtalityxE-Day LifexEnhancex
EntityChargingInfrastructureHostChargingInfrastructureProviderFleetOperatorPremierPartnerServiceProviderTrialParticipantVehicleSupplierEPA VictoriaxExigencyxEV EngineeringxFederation SquarexFreeFuelxGeneral Electric (GE) x x xGM HoldenxGo Get Car ShareGreen Energy TradingxxJuicePointxKangan Institute of TAFELinking Melbourne AuthorityLINK Community TransportxxxLumley Insurance x xManningham City CouncilxMelbourne Airport x xMelbourne Museum x xMitsubishi CorpxMitsubishi Motors AustraliaxMomentum EnergyxMonash University x xMoreland City CouncilMornington Peninsula ShireCouncilMount Alexander Shire CouncilxxxMT DataxMunicipal Association ofVictoria (MAV)xNissan Motor Company (Aust) x xNHP Electrical EngineeringProductsxOrigin x xPowercor Australia x xCREATING A MARKET 143
Page 1 and 2:
CREATINGA MARKETVICTORIAN ELECTRICV
Page 3 and 4:
Measures which reduce electriccar p
Page 5 and 6:
5.4 Public charging 815.4.1 How muc
Page 7 and 8:
The trial is a $5 millioninitiative
Page 9 and 10:
In 2012, Mitsubishi, Nissan,and Hol
Page 11 and 12:
2.4 HOW DOES ELECTRIC VEHICLECHARGI
Page 13 and 14:
Meter, Switch orDistribution BoardD
Page 15 and 16:
It has brought together allthe piec
Page 17 and 18:
Commercial negotiations and astruct
Page 19 and 20:
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION CASE STUDYMOBIL
Page 21 and 22:
RACV considers electricvehicles to
Page 23 and 24:
What we need from you: The particip
Page 25 and 26:
Information gained fromthe cars has
Page 27 and 28:
Alongside differences in utilisatio
Page 29 and 30:
Evidence suggests that while purcha
Page 31 and 32:
This sort of functionality is expec
Page 33 and 34:
4.1.5 What about electriccommercial
Page 35 and 36:
A clearly positive influence on peo
Page 37 and 38:
Having to make these considerations
Page 39 and 40:
Analysis of the vehicle monitoringd
Page 41 and 42:
4.2.4 How much does it costfor an a
Page 43 and 44:
Experience from overseas suggeststh
Page 45 and 46:
In terms of who drives the decision
Page 47 and 48:
Despite this relative under-utilisa
Page 49 and 50:
Within the traditional fleet assetm
Page 51 and 52:
CORPORATE CHARGING NETWORK CASE STU
Page 53 and 54:
Nearly 140 household, fleetand publ
Page 55 and 56:
The trial charging infrastructure v
Page 57 and 58:
Through these efforts, trial partic
Page 59 and 60:
To support trip planning and rangem
Page 61 and 62:
5.2 HOME CHARGING5.2.1 How much doe
Page 63 and 64:
The general process for the househo
Page 65 and 66:
Although this outcome was a success
Page 67 and 68:
The appeal of a financial incentive
Page 69 and 70:
5.2.5 What do households thinkof el
Page 71 and 72:
It provides guidance on the allocat
Page 73 and 74:
An example of this was theDepartmen
Page 75 and 76:
Based upon the trial experience, th
Page 77 and 78:
WORKPLACE CHARGING CASE STUDYVICTOR
Page 79 and 80:
Workplace charging appears to be ak
Page 81 and 82:
One scenario of particular interest
Page 83 and 84:
Cost data obtained from various sit
Page 85 and 86:
PUBLIC CHARGING CASE STUDYON-STREET
Page 87 and 88:
Household participants were askedab
Page 89 and 90:
The following quote supplied to the
Page 91 and 92: Despite these challenging figuresan
Page 93 and 94: According to theory (Lieberman andM
Page 95 and 96: The pushback by parking operatorsag
Page 97 and 98: There’s a lot to like aboutincrea
Page 99 and 100: The economic analysis hasexamined t
Page 101 and 102: Under a ‘mid-range’ scenario as
Page 103 and 104: 6.1.3 What are the costs andbenefit
Page 105 and 106: 6.2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS6.2.1 How
Page 107 and 108: Based upon the limited informationa
Page 109 and 110: 6.3 SOCIAL IMPACTS6.3.1 How is comm
Page 111 and 112: A key challenge for many electricve
Page 113 and 114: The effectiveness ofthese initiativ
Page 115 and 116: The supplementary data andinteracti
Page 117 and 118: EV PROMOTION CASE STUDYELECTRIC CAR
Page 119 and 120: In addition to the EV School progra
Page 121 and 122: 7.1.4 How has the local electricveh
Page 123 and 124: 7.2 INSIGHTS7.2.1 How do we best te
Page 125 and 126: ISSUES ANDOPPORTUNITIESA significan
Page 127 and 128: Issue Classification Sections Oppor
Page 129 and 130: Issue Classification Sections Oppor
Page 131 and 132: Drawing upon the learnings acquired
Page 133 and 134: ACRONYMS,GLOSSARY ANDUNITS OF MEASU
Page 135 and 136: OPEC - Organisation of the Petroleu
Page 137 and 138: Actew AGL 2009, History of mobile p
Page 139 and 140: Ergon 2012, Pool pump connections,
Page 141: Smart Grid News 2012, Aussie firm u
Page 145 and 146: APPENDIX BEVS AND FLEETS 2012 PRACT
Page 147 and 148: APPENDIX CCHARGING OUTLET ATTRIBUTE
Page 149 and 150: Area Attribute DefinitionBilling /
Page 151 and 152: APPENDIX EEV CHARGING COURTESY SIGN
show all

victorian electric vehicle trial mid-term report - Department of Transport

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?