19-301 POSTER SESSION: VOTING BEHAVIORPresenter Vote Fragmentation in Presidential Primaries and 3rd PartySupportRoom TBA, Board 1, Fri 3:45 pmEser Sekercioglu, Stony Brook UniversityOverview: TBAPresenter When Function Follows Form: How Ballot Design AffectsVoting ChoiceRoom TBA, Board 2, Fri 3:45 pmMichael P. Bobic, Emmanuel CollegeOverview: This paper presents findings from an experiment inwhich two different ballots were used in a mock election.Results showed even small differences produced large effects.Presenter Vote Choice Change and the Durability of Changed VoteChoiceRoom TBA, Board 3, Fri 3:45 pmSeoyoon H. Choi, University of Texas, AustinOverview: This article examines the cause of the voters’ votechoice change which leads to realignment in Americanpresidential election and its durability in terms of party policyand its attitude toward issues.Presenter Negative Campaign Advertising Revisited: The Effects onVoting BehaviorRoom TBA, Board 4, Fri 3:45 pmMatthew L. Bergbower, Southern Illinois University,CarbondaleOverview: Negative campaign advertising effects on politicalbehavior is an underdeveloped phenomenon. Using data oncampaign strategies and NES data, my research seeks tounderstand the individual effects of negative campaignadvertising.Presenter Are Native Americans Democrats? Analyzing NativeRoomAmerican Democratic Party LoyaltyTBA, Board 5, Fri 3:45 pmRachel E. Becker, Bemidji State UniversityOverview: While nearly two-thirds of Native Americans callthemselves Democrats, 28% of those Democratic identifiersconsider themselves conservative. I analyzed this apparentparadox behind the party identification of some NativeAmericans.20-4 MONEY AND ELECTIONSRoomChairPaperPaperPaperTBA, Fri 3:45 pmPeter L. Francia, East Carolina UniversityProspecting for <strong>Political</strong> Gold: Predicting the SpatialDistribution of Campaign ContributionsJames G. Gimpel, University of MarylandWendy K. Tam Cho, Northwestern UniversityOverview: This paper examines the geographic distribution ofcampaign contributions, and estimates the spatial distribution offuture contribution amounts from the distribution of pastcontribution amounts.Creating a Culture of <strong>Political</strong> GivingDave Wiltse, Shippensburg UniversityOverview: Using pooled NES data, the individual contributiondecision will be modeled to examine the effects of statecampaign finance laws since the early 1980’s. Specifically, theeffects of contribution limits and public financing regimes willbe gauged.Does Campaign Money Signal Candidate Quality?Riccardo Puglisi, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyAndrea Prat, London School of EconomicsJames M. Snyder, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyOverview: We match an effectiveness measure for legislators inNorth Carolina Legislature with data on campaigncontributions. Can voters learn about the effectiveness of acandidate as a legislator by looking at amount and pattern ofcontributions received?PaperPaperDisc.Money, Elections and Legislative Activity: The Iowa StateLegislative Elections of 2004 and Assembly Session of 2005Arthur Sanders, Drake UniversityOverview: This paper examines the role of money in thepolitical process at the state level by examining the influence ofmoney in the 2004 elections to the Iowa State House and StateSenate and the impact this had on the spring 2005 legislativesession.Is Paying for <strong>Political</strong> Consultants an Efficient Use ofCampaign Funds in U.S. House Elections?Sean A. Cain, University of California, San DiegoOverview: Reliance on political consultants is an efficient use ofscarce resources.Clifford W. Brown, Union College21-301 POSTER SESSION: REPRESENTATIONAND ELECTORAL SYSTEMSPresenter Wedge Issue Politics: The Effects of Divisive Issues onRepresentationRoom TBA, Board 6, Fri 3:45 pmKathryn E. Bowman, The Ohio State UniversityOverview: This project examines whether wedge issues such asstem cell research and gay marriage influence the manner inwhich a member of Congress represents his or her district.Presenter Counter-Initiatives: Spatial Theory and EvidenceRoomTBA, Board 7, Fri 3:45 pmDavid A. S. Hugh-Jones, Essex UniversityOverview: In some initiative elections, a counter-initiativeoverrules the original initiative if it gets more votes. My modelshows that with sophisticated voters, counter-initiatives bringoutcomes toward the median voter. I test against a cues-basedtheory.22-3 RACE, GENDER, RELIGION ANDAMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY (Cosponsoredwith Foreign Policy, see 16-8)RoomChairPaperPaperPaperPaperTBA, Fri 3:45 pmBenjamin I. Page, Northwestern UniversityChristian Fundamentalism and Foreign Policy Attitudes inthe United StatesDavid C. Barker, University of PittsburghJon Hurwitz, University of PittsburghTraci L. Nelson, University of PittsburghOverview: This paper examines how religious doctrine andbehavior may influence attitudes toward U.S. foreign policy --attitudes that have become increasingly important predictors ofpartisanship and voting behavior.The Effect of Sexuality on Foreign Policy AttitudesJamie P. Chandler, CUNY Graduate CenterOverview: Using pooled data from the 1988 to 2002 GeneralSocial Survey, this research finds, when controlling forbackground factors and value orientations, sexuality influencesforeign policy attitudes.Micro-Level Foreign Aid Attitudes of the U.S. Mass Public:A Role for RaceAmanda L. Cooper, University of KentuckyOverview: I compare the ability of typical indicators of generalforeign policy attitudes and the ability of commonly helddomestic welfare attitudes to explain variation in micro-levelpublic opinion regarding government spending on foreignassistance.Religious Influences on Foreign Policy AttitudesJames L. Guth, Furman UniversityOverview: This paper examines the influence of religiousaffiliations, beliefs and behaviors on public attitudes towardAmerican foreign policy.178
PaperDisc.Ethnic Minority Interest Group Attributes and ForeignPolicy InfluenceTrevor P. Rubenzer, University of Wisconsin, MilwaukeeOverview: To what extent are ethnic minority interests groupsable to influence U.S. foreign policy? The current study usesQualitative Comparative Analysis to isolate necessary andsufficient conditions for ethnic minority influence.Richard Sobel, Harvard University22-5 OPINIONS ABOUT TERRORISM AND THEWAR ON TERRORRoomChairPaperPaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.TBA, Fri 3:45 pmMichael Wolf, Indiana University-Purdue University, FortWayneThe Politics of Fear: Personal Concern and Perception ofPublic Concern about Terrorist AttacksDonald P. Haider-Markel, University of KansasMark R. Joslyn, University of KansasAllan Cigler, University of KansasOverview: We expolore the partisan dimensions of anxietyabout terrorism. Using several national surveys, our findingsindicate a strong partisan dimension, especially in theimmediate aftermath of 9-11 and in the weeks prior to Iraq War.The War on Terror in the Context of US Foreign PolicyMoods and InterestsJack Holmes, Hope CollegeKurt Pyle, Hope CollegeOverview: The Mood/Interest Theory of U.S. Foreign Policyprovides a useful framework for the analysis of the War onTerror in historical context. The Eisenhower administrationseems a more relevant comparison than the Kennedy andJohnson administrations.Fear Factor: The Impact of Terrorism on Public Opinion inthe US, UK and IsraelWilliam J. Josiger, Georgetown UniversityOverview: Impact of terrorism in the U.S., UK and Israel onpublic opinions from 1979–2004. Does terrorism have adebilitating impact on a country’s morale or do attacks rally thepublic? Do the characteristics of an attack lead to differentialimpacts?Media 'Framing' in the 'War on Terror' and Support forCivil LibertiesLinda M. Merola, Georgetown UniversityOverview: This project examines media framing of the ‘War onTerror,’ identifying frames frequently employed andinvestigating the effects of exposure to such frames uponAmericans' support for civil liberties through the use of surveyexperimentation.Modeling Responses to Terrorism: British Public Opinionand 7/7Paul J. Tran, University of Texas, DallasHarold D. Clarke, University of Texas, DallasOverview: British public opinion data are used to investigatemodels of public opinion about responses to terrorist attacks.Model selection and encompassing tests are used to comparerival morality, benefits-costs, and general heuristic models.Gary C. Jacobson, University of California, San Diego23-1 VOTER TURNOUT, POLITICALPARTICIPATION, AND REPRESENTATIONRoomChairPaperTBA, Fri 3:45 pmPaul S. Martin, University of VirginiaExclusion Through Abstension? Voter Turnout andDemocratic RepresentationRachel K. Cremona, Flagler CollegeOverview: This paper examines the implications of voterturnout for democratic representation through a comparativeanalysis of the impact of turnout on the position of the medianvoter.PaperPaperPaperAn Essay on <strong>Political</strong> Participation: Measuring Voters andNon-Voters Policy PreferencesJean-Francois Godbout, Northwestern UniversityOverview: The following paper is a study of politicalrepresentation. The analysis focuses on the differences ofopinion expressed by voters and nonvoters in a series of publicopinion surveys. We also adopt a novel approach in measuringstate level opinion.The Representational Costs of Nonvoting: The Influence ofDistrict Participation on Policy ResponsivenessPaul S. Martin, University of VirginiaOverview: This paper examines the influence of voter turnoutand voter support for incumbent members of Congress on policyresponsiveness.Participation for What? Links Between Participation andAgenda SettingMatthew B. Platt, University of RochesterOverview: This paper attempts to link political participation topolicy responsiveness using the case of black participation. Thearguments borrow from diverse literatures to test the most basicassumption in the subfield: political participation matters.Disc. James W. Endersby, University of Missouri, Columbia24-8 THE POLITICS OF ENTERTAINMENT ANDENTERTAINMENT AS POLITICSRoomChairPaperPaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.TBA, Fri 3:45 pmKimberly Gross, George Washington UniversityLate Night Comedy's Influence on Perceptions ofPresidential CandidatesCarrie A. Cihasky, University of Wisconsin, MilwaukeeOverview: Presidential candidates often appear on late-nightshows and are the main targets of shows' jokes. This paper usesdata from the 2000 NAES to examine how viewers' perceptionsof the candidates are influenced by late-night comedy duringcampaigns.Late Night Comic Characterization of the Vice President'sAneurysm SurgeryJosh Compton, Southwest Baptist UniversityOverview: This textual analysis project builds on late nightcomedy political research and expands the scope to the domainof health by examining late night comic characterization of VicePresident Cheney's aneurysm surgery in September 2005.Where Have All The Protest Songs Gone? SocialMovements Message and Their Voice in PoliticsShelley M. Deane, Bowdoin CollegeElizabeth Bloodgood, University of PennsylvaniaOverview: Where Have All the Protest Songs Gone? In 2003-5a plethora of articles asserted a surprising lack of protest musicin response to issues of the new millennium, includingglobalization, war, peace, civil rights, and the environment.Public Opinion and Legal Closure: The Politics of Law andOrderGeoff Peterson, University of Wisconsin, Eau ClaireSally Trnka, University of Wisconsin, Eau ClaireOverview: This paper examines the connection between publicopinion on high profile legal cases and how those cases are "recreated"on television.What's Law Got To Do With It? Media Coverage of theMichael Jackson TrialRobert W. Van Sickel, Indiana State UniversityOverview: This paper explores mass media coverage of pop starMichael Jackson' s recent criminal trial, in an attempt to assessthe intersection of law, entertainment, and public educationregarding legal issues and processes.Kimberly Gross, George Washington University179
- Page 1 and 2:
MidwestPolitical Science Associatio
- Page 4 and 5:
9-4 STATE BUILDING AND BUREAUCRATIC
- Page 6 and 7:
14-1 GLOBALIZATION AND SECURITYRoom
- Page 8 and 9:
PaperPaperDisc.The Divide: African
- Page 10 and 11:
29-210 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: CULTURE
- Page 12 and 13:
PaperDisc.Defining Federalism: The
- Page 14 and 15:
PaperDisc.estimates connections amo
- Page 16 and 17:
3-26 THE DETERMINANTS OF ECONOMICGR
- Page 18 and 19:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.Bad Civil Socie
- Page 20 and 21:
PaperPaperDisc.Voting Patterns in t
- Page 22 and 23:
PaperDisc.'Going Local': Candidate
- Page 24 and 25:
PaperPaperDisc.90Reflections on Lit
- Page 26 and 27:
Presenter Out of Time: Examining th
- Page 28 and 29:
is: to what extent are intergovernm
- Page 30 and 31:
Presenter Economic Inequality, Its
- Page 32 and 33:
PaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.during the
- Page 34 and 35:
10-3 BACK TO EUROPE? THE EU AND"EUR
- Page 36 and 37:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.Interested Part
- Page 38 and 39:
PaperPaperthatDisc.Don't Know, Don'
- Page 40 and 41:
Disc.Suzanne Soule, Center for Civi
- Page 42 and 43:
epistemology which is attentive to
- Page 44 and 45:
37-3 CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATIONA
- Page 46 and 47:
47-201 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: RELIGIO
- Page 48 and 49:
PaperPaperDisc.terms and reciprocal
- Page 50 and 51:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.116Education, E
- Page 52 and 53:
19-202 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: YOUNG A
- Page 54 and 55:
26-6 ASIAN AMERICAN POLITICSRoomCha
- Page 56 and 57:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.of how partisan
- Page 58 and 59:
PaperPaperDisc.124An Experimental S
- Page 60 and 61:
PaperPaperDisc.Policy Windows, Atte
- Page 62 and 63: Friday, April 21 - 8:30 am - 10:15
- Page 64 and 65: PaperPaperPaperDisc.The Determinant
- Page 66 and 67: PaperPaperDisc.A Simple Game-Theore
- Page 68 and 69: PaperDisc.partisans is causing chan
- Page 70 and 71: 28-201 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: DEWEY'S
- Page 72 and 73: 35-4 THE EFFECTS OF REDISTRICTING O
- Page 74 and 75: Presenter Regulation, Enforcement a
- Page 76 and 77: Friday, April 21 - 10: 30 am - 12:1
- Page 78 and 79: PaperPaperDisc.144Regional Minority
- Page 80 and 81: PaperPaperDisc.Administration of Gl
- Page 82 and 83: PaperPaperPaperDisc.The Paradox Soc
- Page 84 and 85: Disc.("Policy Mood") since 1972 usi
- Page 86 and 87: Disc.likelihood of a filibuster is
- Page 88 and 89: 38-301 POSTER SESSION: COMPARATIVEI
- Page 90 and 91: 54-1 SOCIAL ACTIVISM AND CIVICENGAG
- Page 92 and 93: 3-203 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: THE LEGA
- Page 94 and 95: PaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.Toward Res
- Page 96 and 97: Presenter The Shanghai Cooperation
- Page 98 and 99: PaperPaperPaperDisc.poised to becom
- Page 100 and 101: PaperDisc.chapter in Foucault's int
- Page 102 and 103: PaperDisc.Campaign Ad Images as Sig
- Page 104 and 105: 43-6 INDEPENDENT SCRUTINY OF AGENCI
- Page 106 and 107: Friday, April 21 - 3:45 pm - 5:30 p
- Page 108 and 109: 6-2 PARTIES AND PARTY DISCIPLINERoo
- Page 110 and 111: PaperDisc.assesses the impact of co
- Page 114 and 115: 24-9 WHO LEADS: UNTANGLING THERELAT
- Page 116 and 117: PaperPaperPaperDisc.182Understandin
- Page 118 and 119: Paper The Rehnquist Court and the N
- Page 120 and 121: PaperDisc.Revenge of Socialist Supe
- Page 122 and 123: Saturday, April 22 - 8:30 am - 10:1
- Page 124 and 125: PaperDisc.South Korean Public Opini
- Page 126 and 127: PaperDisc.several other variables b
- Page 128 and 129: 22-15 PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL (Co-spo
- Page 130 and 131: PaperDisc.never seems to provide us
- Page 132 and 133: PaperPaperPaperDisc.Polarization an
- Page 134 and 135: PaperDisc.Networks of Local Governm
- Page 136 and 137: 47-203 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: RELIGIO
- Page 138 and 139: PaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.Between De
- Page 140 and 141: 11-9 NEW THEORIES AND THUS NEWDEBAT
- Page 142 and 143: PaperPaperPaperAre Political Market
- Page 144 and 145: 26-9 MINORITY REPRESENTATIONRoomCha
- Page 146 and 147: PaperDisc.Evolving Political Machin
- Page 148 and 149: PaperPaperPaperDisc.economic gains
- Page 150 and 151: PaperPaperPaperDisc.A Social Versus
- Page 152 and 153: Saturday, April 21 - 1:45 pm - 3:30
- Page 154 and 155: PaperPaperDisc.Riptides in Ontario:
- Page 156 and 157: PaperPaperPaperDisc."works," a stat
- Page 158 and 159: PaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.Preference
- Page 160 and 161: PaperPaperPaperDisc.226that encoura
- Page 162 and 163:
32-12 POLITICAL PARTIES IN ELECTION
- Page 164 and 165:
PaperPaperDisc.Challenging Others o
- Page 166 and 167:
52-3 SOCIAL POLICIES: CHALLENGES AN
- Page 168 and 169:
Saturday, April 22 - 3:45 pm - 5:30
- Page 170 and 171:
PaperDisc.It's Not the Economy Stup
- Page 172 and 173:
15-10 DEMOCRACY, EQUALITY, AND PEAC
- Page 174 and 175:
Presenter Polarization, Public Opin
- Page 176 and 177:
PaperDisc.John S. Mill and Alexis d
- Page 178 and 179:
PaperDisc.Lobbying by Transportatio
- Page 180 and 181:
42-202 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: DOMESTI
- Page 182 and 183:
Presenter Female Athletes Making He
- Page 184 and 185:
PaperPaperDisc.Micro-Level Determin
- Page 186 and 187:
PaperDisc.Governmental Structure, P
- Page 188 and 189:
PaperDisc.Social Class Identity and
- Page 190 and 191:
33-9 PRESIDENTIAL-CONGRESSIONALRELA
- Page 192 and 193:
PaperPaperDisc.Equal Employment Opp
- Page 194 and 195:
Sunday, April 23 - 10:30 am - 12:15
- Page 196 and 197:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.State Legitimac
- Page 198 and 199:
18-14 THE STUDY AND MEASUREMENT OFR
- Page 200 and 201:
28-14 ROUSSEAU RECONSIDEREDRoomChai
- Page 202 and 203:
PaperDisc.The Judicial Treatment of