19-202 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: YOUNG ANDOLD VOTERS IN COMPARATIVEPERSPECTIVERoom TBA, Thur 3:45 pmPresenter Do Older People Vote Differently? A Longitudinal Analysisof Britain and GermanyAchim Goerres, London School of EconomicsOverview: Several hypotheses of older people's votingbehaviour are tested. Older people can be different from otherage groups because they belong to different generations.Socialization at young age is more important than life cycleinterests at old age.21-2 ELECTORAL RULES AND PARTYDISCIPLINERoomChairPaperPaperPaperDisc.TBA, Thur 3:45 pmTheodore T. Hindson, Texas State University, San MarcosPolitics of Electoral Defection: Do Electoral SystemsMatter?Alex C. Chang, University of IowaOverview: In this paper, I use game theory to simulate partylegislatorrelation. I find that benefit-cost ratio of legislativeseats determines the frequency of political defection. A crossnationalanalysis also proves this finding.Party Discipline, Voter Heterogeneity, and the Notion ofRepresentation: The Strange Case of SpainJeremy J. Albright, Indiana University, BloomingtonOverview: This paper explores how multi-level government inSpain has functioned to compensate for substantial distortionscreated by the country’s electoral system.Understanding the Electoral CollegeRobert M. Alexander, Ohio Northern UniversityBrittani Knisely, Ohio Northern UniversityTiffany Ferry, Ohio Northern UniversityAdam Gallagher, Ohio Northern UniversitySteve Kochheiser, Ohio Northern UniversityBarbara Tate, Ohio Northern UniversityTina Loughry, Ohio Northern UniversityOverview: This essay uses a mail survey of presidential electorsfrom the 2000 and 2004 campaigns in an effort to unmask theseelusive gatekeepers to the American presidency.Michael F. Thies, University of California, Los Angeles22-1 GOVERNMENT RESPONSIVENESS TOPUBLIC POLICY PREFERENCES ACROSSPOLICY DOMAINSRoomChairPaperPaperPaperTBA, Thur 3:45 pmLarry Bartels, Princeton UniversityIssue Salience and Electoral AccountabilityBrandice Canes-Wrone, Princeton UniversityDavid Brady, Stanford UniversityMichael Cutrone, Princeton UniversityOverview: We examine whether the impact of House members'legislative votes on electoral performance depends upon thesalience of the legislative votes.Issue Ownership and Representation Across Policy DomainsPatrick J. Egan, University of California, BerkeleyOverview: This paper presents a theory and a test of how "issueownership"--the varying degree to which the public trusts thepolitical parties to handle policy issues--causes therepresentation of constituency opinion to differ across policydomains.Public Opinion, Race, and Public PolicyJohn Griffin, University of Notre DameBrian Newman, Pepperdine UniversityOverview: We examine racial differences in responsiveness,comparing changes in federal spending across nine policydomains with racial groups' preferences. We find that racialminorities exert much more influence on issues they care moreabout.PaperPaperDisc.Inequality and Responsiveness to Public Preferences AcrossIssue DomainsMartin Gilens, Princeton UniversityOverview: My previous research has shown that high incomeAmericans are much more likely to see their policy preferencesreflected in government policy. In this paper, I explore thelimits of this inequality and it's variation across issue areas.Representational SegmentationLawrence R. Jacobs, University of MinnesotaBenjamin I. Page, Northwestern UniversityOverview: Our paper will synthesize new and old research onunequal voice and disparities in representation. Our basic focuswill be to identify systematic forces in the American politicalsystem that privilege the voice and influence of segments of thepublicBenjamin I. Page, Northwestern UniversityLarry Bartels, Princeton University22-203 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE:MANIPULATING PUBLIC OPINIONRoom TBA, Thur 3:45 pmPresenter Influencing Opinion to Agree with Policy: A Strategy forChangeAmy M. Beckius-Johnson, University of South DakotaOverview: The focus of this paper is to develop a strategy toreshape public opinion regarding unpopular policy.Observations of political behavior from the public will be usedas well as modern examples of latent policy recovery.Presenter Priming, Personality, and Perceptions of the United NationsPaul W. Burton, Michigan State UniversityOverview: This project uses a survey experiment to test theeffect of positive and negative stimuli on the public'sperceptions of the United Nations. The goal of which is toachieve a better understanding of how public opinion can bemanipulated.22-204 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: ATTITUDESABOUT HEALTH CARERoom TBA, Thur 3:45 pmPresenter Mass Media and Public Opinion in Canada: The State ofHealthcareKelly R. Blidook, McGill UniversityOverview: The issue of healthcare has been dominant in recentCanadian elections and has remained a key issue on the policyagenda beyond elections. This paper aims to expose mediaframing effects on public perceptions of the actual state ofhealthcare.23-10 COMMUNITY DIVERSITY AND POLITICALPARTICIPATIONRoomChairPaperPaperPaperTBA, Thur 3:45 pmDavid E. Campbell, University of Notre DameResidential Income Diversity and <strong>Political</strong> ParticipationDavid E. Campbell, University of Notre DameJohn Griffin, University of Notre DameOverview: This project will examine whether the effects ofresidential income diversity on the civic engagement andparticipation of citizens varies across income groups.Racial Context, Economic Competition, and <strong>Political</strong>ParticipationTetsuya Matsubayashi, Texas A&M UniversityOverview: Using data from Citizen Participation Study mergedwith 1990 census data, this research addresses three questions:Does racial context have a significant effect on massparticipation? How can we modify exiting arguments by takingaccount of other conRace, Racial Environment and <strong>Political</strong> Participation inAmerican CitiesDaniel Rubenson, University of MontrealOverview: This paper analyses the effects of racial environmenton electoral and nonelectoral political participation in American118
Disc.cities, arguing that better measures of diversity are needed andeffects on different racial groups need to be analyzed separatelyBrian Reed, Millikin University24-7 MEDIA EFFECTS IN THE STATESRoomChairPaperPaperPaperDisc.TBA, Thur 3:45 pmSara M. Gubala, Michigan State UniversityTurning Purple? How Blue Candidates Deal with RedStates and Vice VersaBrian K. Arbour, University of Texas, AustinLaura Barberena, University of Texas, AustinErnest McGowen, University of Texas,AustinOverview: A paper examining the different images and rhetoricused by parties and candidates in electoral advertisements.Special attention given to issues owned by a particular party andany variability in message these or other factors produce.The Web of Candidates and Parties: Internet Functionalityin the 2004 ElectionDiana T. Cohen, University of FloridaOverview: This paper explores how state parties and Senatecandidates utilized the Web in electoral strategy during the 2004election, including what purposes the Internet served and whatWeb-based tools were found most effective.Majoritarian Media: Evidence from the American StatesMicah D. Weinberg, University of North Carolina, Chapel HillOverview: Using the American states as a test case, this studyestablishes the conditions under which we should expect themedia to improve the connection between public opinion andpublic policy and hence promote democratic policy outcomes.Philip D, Habel, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign24-301 POSTER SESSION: MASS MEDIA ANDPOLITICAL COMMUNICATIONPresenter New Literacy and <strong>Political</strong> CommunicationRoom TBA, Board 1, Thur 3:45 pmStephen C. Brooks, University of AkronOverview: This essay considers the study of the new use ofinformation (new literacy) to understand changes in politicalcommunication for the future. It also recommends how scholarscan use new literacy as a lens to study changing trends in ourfield.Presenter The Da Vinci Code Effect: Leo Strauss, the Neocons and theParanoid StyleRoom TBA, Board 2, Thur 3:45 pmNathan D. Abrams, University of AberdeenOverview: This paper will analyse the uses to which LeoStrauss and the neocons have been put since September 11,2001 in order to understand the workings of American politicalculture -- and the use and abuses of ideas along the wholepolitical spectrum.Presenter Obituaries as Sources of <strong>Political</strong> InformationRoom TBA, Board 3, Thur 3:45 pmShannon I. Smithey, Westminster CollegeOverview: 60 years worth of obituaries are analyzed to trackpolitical events as well as individuals' political interests andaffiliations.Presenter The Story in a Story: The Impact of Picture Sequences inNewspaper Articles on Candidate EvaluationRoom TBA, Board 4, Thur 3:45 pmJurgen Maier, Kaiserslautern University of TechnologyOverview: This experimental study used data from twouniversities in Germany and the United States and analyzes theimpact of different picture sequences on the evaluation ofpoliticians.Presenter Newspapers and the Provision of <strong>Political</strong> Source CuesRoomTBA, Board 5, Thur 3:45 pmDavid Schwieder, Susquehanna UniversityOverview: My paper supplements existing work on heuristicreasoning by examining the provision of heuristic source cues innewspaper stories on politics. I find that the "source cueenvironment" in newspapers facilitates successful source cuebased reasoningPresenter Television and Voter TurnoutRoom TBA, Board 6, Thur 3:45 pmMatthew A. Gentzkow, University of ChicagoOverview: I use variation across markets in the timing oftelevision's introduction to identify its impact on voter turnout.The estimated effect is significantly negative, accounting forbetween a quarter and a half of the decline in turnout since the1950s.25-3 EXPLAINING GENDER DIFFERENCES INPOLITICAL ENGAGEMENTRoomChairPaperPaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.TBA, Thur 3:45 pmSherry L. Martin, Cornell UniversityAre Girls Checking Out? Gender and <strong>Political</strong> SocializationinTransitioning DemocraciesSuzanne Soule, Center for Civic EducationJennifer Nairne, Center for Civic EducationOverview: Studies have shown that this gender gap appearsearly in the life cycle, as early as adolescence. I will use datafrom transitioning democracies to examine gender differencesamong adolescents' political attitudes, interest and engagement.Exploring the Dynamics of the Gender Gap in Efficacy andParticipationNadia Khatib, Stony Brook UniversityErin C. Cassese, Stony Brook UniversityOverview: In this study, we employ the 2000-2004 NES panelstudy to evaluate the determinants of both efficacy andparticipation, as well as the relationship between these criticalconstructs, and the consistency of these relationships acrossgender groups.Understanding Gender Differences in <strong>Political</strong> InterestDebra A. Horner, University of Michigan, Ann ArborOverview: This research explores the “gender gap” in politicalinterest by analyzing the differences in how men and womendefine political interest--from a taste for politics to a sense ofstake in outcomes.Gender Differences in <strong>Political</strong> Knowledge: DistinguishingCharacteristics-Based and Returns-Based DifferencesJay K. Dow, University of Missouri, ColumbiaKenneth Troske, University of KentuckyOverview: We use the Oaxaca decomposition methodology toassess whether gender based differences in political knowledgeprimarily result from differences in observable attributes ordifferences in returns for otherwise equivalent characteristics.Family Socialization, Gender Differences, and <strong>Political</strong>Interest in ChinaRobert Harmel, Texas A&M UniversityWei Shan, Texas A&M UniversityOverview: Unlike most extant studies of gender differences onpolitical attitudes in China, which tend to seek explanation fromrespondents' own socioeconomic background and status, thisstudy posits and finds a significant role for family socialization.Elizabeth S. Smith, Furman UniversitySherry L. Martin, Cornell University25-102 LECTURE: TEACHING CASE STUDIESON WOMEN AND PUBLIC POLICY (Cosponsoredwith Teaching <strong>Political</strong> <strong>Science</strong> and<strong>Midwest</strong> Women's Caucus, see 48-104 and 49-107)Room TBA, Thur 3:45 pmLecturer Sally J. Kenney, University of MinnesotaOverview: A workshop designed to introduce participants to thecase study method, how to find cases and instructionalmaterials, and the Center on Women and Public Policy's casestudy program119
- Page 1 and 2: MidwestPolitical Science Associatio
- Page 4 and 5: 9-4 STATE BUILDING AND BUREAUCRATIC
- Page 6 and 7: 14-1 GLOBALIZATION AND SECURITYRoom
- Page 8 and 9: PaperPaperDisc.The Divide: African
- Page 10 and 11: 29-210 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: CULTURE
- Page 12 and 13: PaperDisc.Defining Federalism: The
- Page 14 and 15: PaperDisc.estimates connections amo
- Page 16 and 17: 3-26 THE DETERMINANTS OF ECONOMICGR
- Page 18 and 19: PaperPaperPaperDisc.Bad Civil Socie
- Page 20 and 21: PaperPaperDisc.Voting Patterns in t
- Page 22 and 23: PaperDisc.'Going Local': Candidate
- Page 24 and 25: PaperPaperDisc.90Reflections on Lit
- Page 26 and 27: Presenter Out of Time: Examining th
- Page 28 and 29: is: to what extent are intergovernm
- Page 30 and 31: Presenter Economic Inequality, Its
- Page 32 and 33: PaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.during the
- Page 34 and 35: 10-3 BACK TO EUROPE? THE EU AND"EUR
- Page 36 and 37: PaperPaperPaperDisc.Interested Part
- Page 38 and 39: PaperPaperthatDisc.Don't Know, Don'
- Page 40 and 41: Disc.Suzanne Soule, Center for Civi
- Page 42 and 43: epistemology which is attentive to
- Page 44 and 45: 37-3 CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATIONA
- Page 46 and 47: 47-201 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: RELIGIO
- Page 48 and 49: PaperPaperDisc.terms and reciprocal
- Page 50 and 51: PaperPaperPaperDisc.116Education, E
- Page 54 and 55: 26-6 ASIAN AMERICAN POLITICSRoomCha
- Page 56 and 57: PaperPaperPaperDisc.of how partisan
- Page 58 and 59: PaperPaperDisc.124An Experimental S
- Page 60 and 61: PaperPaperDisc.Policy Windows, Atte
- Page 62 and 63: Friday, April 21 - 8:30 am - 10:15
- Page 64 and 65: PaperPaperPaperDisc.The Determinant
- Page 66 and 67: PaperPaperDisc.A Simple Game-Theore
- Page 68 and 69: PaperDisc.partisans is causing chan
- Page 70 and 71: 28-201 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: DEWEY'S
- Page 72 and 73: 35-4 THE EFFECTS OF REDISTRICTING O
- Page 74 and 75: Presenter Regulation, Enforcement a
- Page 76 and 77: Friday, April 21 - 10: 30 am - 12:1
- Page 78 and 79: PaperPaperDisc.144Regional Minority
- Page 80 and 81: PaperPaperDisc.Administration of Gl
- Page 82 and 83: PaperPaperPaperDisc.The Paradox Soc
- Page 84 and 85: Disc.("Policy Mood") since 1972 usi
- Page 86 and 87: Disc.likelihood of a filibuster is
- Page 88 and 89: 38-301 POSTER SESSION: COMPARATIVEI
- Page 90 and 91: 54-1 SOCIAL ACTIVISM AND CIVICENGAG
- Page 92 and 93: 3-203 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: THE LEGA
- Page 94 and 95: PaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.Toward Res
- Page 96 and 97: Presenter The Shanghai Cooperation
- Page 98 and 99: PaperPaperPaperDisc.poised to becom
- Page 100 and 101: PaperDisc.chapter in Foucault's int
- Page 102 and 103:
PaperDisc.Campaign Ad Images as Sig
- Page 104 and 105:
43-6 INDEPENDENT SCRUTINY OF AGENCI
- Page 106 and 107:
Friday, April 21 - 3:45 pm - 5:30 p
- Page 108 and 109:
6-2 PARTIES AND PARTY DISCIPLINERoo
- Page 110 and 111:
PaperDisc.assesses the impact of co
- Page 112 and 113:
19-301 POSTER SESSION: VOTING BEHAV
- Page 114 and 115:
24-9 WHO LEADS: UNTANGLING THERELAT
- Page 116 and 117:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.182Understandin
- Page 118 and 119:
Paper The Rehnquist Court and the N
- Page 120 and 121:
PaperDisc.Revenge of Socialist Supe
- Page 122 and 123:
Saturday, April 22 - 8:30 am - 10:1
- Page 124 and 125:
PaperDisc.South Korean Public Opini
- Page 126 and 127:
PaperDisc.several other variables b
- Page 128 and 129:
22-15 PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL (Co-spo
- Page 130 and 131:
PaperDisc.never seems to provide us
- Page 132 and 133:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.Polarization an
- Page 134 and 135:
PaperDisc.Networks of Local Governm
- Page 136 and 137:
47-203 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: RELIGIO
- Page 138 and 139:
PaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.Between De
- Page 140 and 141:
11-9 NEW THEORIES AND THUS NEWDEBAT
- Page 142 and 143:
PaperPaperPaperAre Political Market
- Page 144 and 145:
26-9 MINORITY REPRESENTATIONRoomCha
- Page 146 and 147:
PaperDisc.Evolving Political Machin
- Page 148 and 149:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.economic gains
- Page 150 and 151:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.A Social Versus
- Page 152 and 153:
Saturday, April 21 - 1:45 pm - 3:30
- Page 154 and 155:
PaperPaperDisc.Riptides in Ontario:
- Page 156 and 157:
PaperPaperPaperDisc."works," a stat
- Page 158 and 159:
PaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.Preference
- Page 160 and 161:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.226that encoura
- Page 162 and 163:
32-12 POLITICAL PARTIES IN ELECTION
- Page 164 and 165:
PaperPaperDisc.Challenging Others o
- Page 166 and 167:
52-3 SOCIAL POLICIES: CHALLENGES AN
- Page 168 and 169:
Saturday, April 22 - 3:45 pm - 5:30
- Page 170 and 171:
PaperDisc.It's Not the Economy Stup
- Page 172 and 173:
15-10 DEMOCRACY, EQUALITY, AND PEAC
- Page 174 and 175:
Presenter Polarization, Public Opin
- Page 176 and 177:
PaperDisc.John S. Mill and Alexis d
- Page 178 and 179:
PaperDisc.Lobbying by Transportatio
- Page 180 and 181:
42-202 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: DOMESTI
- Page 182 and 183:
Presenter Female Athletes Making He
- Page 184 and 185:
PaperPaperDisc.Micro-Level Determin
- Page 186 and 187:
PaperDisc.Governmental Structure, P
- Page 188 and 189:
PaperDisc.Social Class Identity and
- Page 190 and 191:
33-9 PRESIDENTIAL-CONGRESSIONALRELA
- Page 192 and 193:
PaperPaperDisc.Equal Employment Opp
- Page 194 and 195:
Sunday, April 23 - 10:30 am - 12:15
- Page 196 and 197:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.State Legitimac
- Page 198 and 199:
18-14 THE STUDY AND MEASUREMENT OFR
- Page 200 and 201:
28-14 ROUSSEAU RECONSIDEREDRoomChai
- Page 202 and 203:
PaperDisc.The Judicial Treatment of