PaperPaperDisc.Policy Windows, Attention Structures, and Responsivenessin Nonprofit Organizations: A Stakeholder SalienceApproachChao Guo, Arizona State UniversityOverview: This study introduces a stakeholder salienceapproach to responsiveness in nonprofit organizations, andcontends that managers prioritize competing stakeholder claimsbased on their salience levelsExplaining Administrative Responsiveness to Citizens:Environment, Capacity, and CultureKaifeng Yang, Florida State UniversitySanjay Pandey, University of KansasOverview: TBAMatthew Dull, University of Wisconsin-Madison43-203 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: FARMING ITOUT: SUBCONTRACTING PUBLICADMINISTRATIONRoom TBA, Thur 3:45 pmPresenter Is State-Centered Public Administration Dead in the UnitedStates?Uday C. Desai, Southern Illinois University, CarbondaleKeith Snavely, Southern Illinois University, CarbondaleOverview: The state is receding and the private sectorexpanding into former public space. Market-like, private goodexchanges are supplanting citizen-state, public good exchanges.In such a world state-centered public administration is muchless relevant.Presenter Examining Competition in Social Service Contracting: Caseof FloridaScott J. Lamothe, University of Nebraska, LincolnMeeyoung S. Lamothe, University of Nebraska, OmahaOverview: By examining human services in Florida, the authorsconduct an in-depth analysis of competition in social servicescontracting, focusing on competitiveness in the bidding process;provider consolidation; and provider performance.43-204 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: TROLLS,KILLERS, & RESEARCH: ACCESSINGPUBLIC DATA IN AN AGE OF TERRORRoom TBA, Thur 3:45 pmPresenter Dallas S. Drake, Center for Homicide ResearchOverview: This paper explores the difficulty in accessingcommon public data for homicide research. The unique need forsuch access will be examined along with ramifications of notdoing so.44-4 INSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONSRoomChairPaperPaperPaperTBA, Thur 3:45 pmRobert Mickey, University of Michigan, Ann ArborMoney from Strangers: Minority Moneylenders and theMitigation of RiskCatherine S. M. Duggan, Stanford UniversityOverview: What accounts for the remarkable success ofmoneylenders from minority groups? I argue that the dynamicsof these groups allowed them to lend at low risk, and test thisusing evidence from the Jews in Medieval England and theIndians in Uganda.De-Restricting Democracy in the United States and SouthAfricaShamira M. Gelbman, University of VirginiaOverview: Based on a paired comparison of the United Statesand South Africa, I argue that a coalition between suffragistsocial movements and working class organizations inducespolitical elites to remove barriers to non-racially restricteddemocracy.Why Are the Western States So Big? Interests, Institutions,and Entrepreneurship in American <strong>Political</strong> Expansion,1860-1900Matthew Glassman, Yale UniversityOverview: This paper examines the politics of constructing newstates in the western United States in the 19th century. It isPaperDisc.animated by a simple question: why are the western states sobig?Regulating Layoffs: The Case of U.S. Plant-ClosingLegislationJune Park, University of PittsburghOverview: Why was the 1988 Worker Adjustment andRetraining Notification Act enacted in the year it was enacted?It was crucial that most state courts recognized the common-lawexceptions to the employment at will during the 1980s.Robert Mickey, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor47-6 CONTEMPORARY ISSUES INEVANGELICAL POLITICSRoomChairPaperPaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.TBA, Thur 3:45 pmDaniel Hofrenning, St. Olaf CollegeThe Myth of the Christian Right: Analysis of GroupMember and <strong>Political</strong> ParticipationMatthew K. DeSantis, University of FloridaOverview: The following paper challenges the traditional beliefsthat followers of the Christian Right are highly active politicalparticipants. Data analysis shows low levels of groupmembership and political participation amongst evangelicalProtestants.The <strong>Political</strong> Participation of the Religious Right: Trendsand ConsequencesPatrick R. Miller, University of North Carolina, Chapel HillOverview: This paper examines trends in the politicalparticipation of Christian Conservatives and their attitudestowards government. The implications of the growth of thereligious right for the quality of liberal democracy areconsidered.The <strong>Political</strong> Implications of Elite Framing of PremillennialEschatologyPaula N. Booke, University of ChicagoOverview: This paper examines the relationship in elitediscourse between premillennial theology and antiglobalization,anti-government regulation, anti-secularizationand pro-Israel policiesApples and Oranges: Methodological Issues in Determiningthe Population of the Christian RightMatthew K. DeSantis, University of FloridaMarija Anna Bekafigo, University of GeorgiaOverview: The paper addresses methodological issues whenmeasuring the Christian Right population in individual levelsurveys. The paper demonstrates previous methodologicalshortcomings and highlights new advances, which will enablemore precise measurement.Saving Hearts, Influencing Politics: Evangelizing for<strong>Political</strong> ChangeAndra Gillespie, Emory UniversityOverview: Using ethnographic data collected before and duringevangelical crusades in Connecticut and Washington, DC in2001 and 2005, this paper shows how local organizers channeltheir social and political concerns into helping plan evangelisticcrusades.Laura R. Olson, Clemson UniversityGeoffrey C. Layman, University of Maryland50-1 PLATONIC POLITICSRoomChairPaperPaperTBA, Thur 3:45 pmMatthew J. Franck, Radford UniversitySocrates' Silence in Plato's CleitophonMartin J. Plax, Cleveland State UniversityOverview: Why, in the Cleitophon, did Socrates remain silentafter Cleitophon demonstrated the limits of Socraticexhortation? This paper argues Cleitophon's praise ofThrasymachus is advice on how Socrates should speak to jurorsin his own trial.The Immortality of the Soul and the Origin of the Cosmos inPlato's PHAEDOAnn Ward, University of ReginaOverview: In Plato's PHAEDO, Socrates shows that politicalphilosophy necessarily leads to natural science. Yet, Socrates'126
PaperDisc.return to political questions is not a return to traditional pietybut to the "Ideas" as cause and source of stability in the cosmos.The Logical Structure of Plato’s LawsElizabeth A. L'Arrivee, University of Notre DameOverview: Some commentators argue that the Laws does nothave a clear organization. However, the Laws is answering alucid question according to a logical structure, and the proposalsset forth must be understood as corresponding to this structure.Marlene K. Sokolon, Concordia UniversityBryan Benson, Western Governors University51-2 SOME CONSEQUENCES OF SAME-SEXMARRIAGERoomChairTBA, Thur 3:45 pmEllen Andersen, Indiana University Purdue University,IndianapolisPaper Whither Culture War? Gay Marriage and the 2004ElectionsElvin T. Lim, University of TulsaOverview: This paper examines media and elite discussions ofgay marraige in the one month before Election Day 2004.PaperPaperPaperDisc.Lesbians, Marriage and <strong>Political</strong> Participation PostGoodridgeJennifer Raymond, University of Massachusetts, BostonOverview: In Goodridge v. Department of Public Health, theMassachusetts Supreme Court ruled that there was no validreason for the state of Massachusetts to prohibit same-sexcouple from receiving marriage licenses.The Electoral Capture of Gay and Lesbian AmericansCharles A. Smith, University of MiamiOverview: The wide-spread popular support for the anti-gayamendments in the 2004 election suggests that Democrats willmarginalize gay and lesbian interests in order to avoid electorallosses.Voting on Marriage: Demographic Influences on theInitiative to Ban Gay Marriage in the Michigan ConstitutionLaurel Sprague, Wayne State UniversityOverview: This paper examines support for Michigan's initiativeto ban gay marriage by looking at voting patterns by income,race, education, presidential votes, and the number of same-sexhouseholds in selected southeastern Michigan cities.Ellen Andersen, Indiana University Purdue University,IndianapolisJason Pierceson, University of Illinois, Springfield57-1 GENDERING PUBLIC AND POLITICALLEADERSHIP (Co-sponsored with Gender andPolitics, see 25-20)RoomChairPaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.TBA, Thur 3:45 pmMary E. Guy, Florida State UniversityThe Gendered Dimensions of Executive OfficeFarida Jalalzai, University of Missouri, St. LouisOverview: This paper analyzes gender in relation to executiveoffice worldwide. Specifically, it investigates the nature ofexecutive power and how open governments are to therepresentation of women as presidents and prime ministers.Rethinking Public and <strong>Political</strong> Leadership with Gender inMindGeorgia Duerst-Lahti, Beloit CollegeOverview: <strong>Political</strong> <strong>Science</strong> tends to divide leadership betweenthe 'political' of elected officials-most often the president-andthe 'public' leadership of administrators. Generally neither takesgender into account.Women, Leadership, and the State: A Critical AssessmentEileen McDonagh, Northeastern UniversityOverview: This paper analyzes the impact of state constructionupon women's access to national leadership positions.Images of Legislative Leadership: Where are the Women?Cindy Simon Rosenthal, University of OklahomaOverview: Have women transformed the images associated withlegislative leadership? This paper contrasts the popularportrayal of women leaders and scholarly understandings ofcongressional leadership.Mary E. Guy, Florida State University52-101 ROUNDTABLE: WHATEVER HAPPENEDTO POLICY ANALYSIS IN THE FEDERALGOVERNMENT? (Co-sponsored with Caucusfor New <strong>Political</strong> <strong>Science</strong>, see 54-101)RoomChairPanelistTBA, Thur 3:45 pmBert A. Rockman, Purdue UniversityBryan D. Jones, University of WashingtonPaul Posner, George Mason UniversityKevin Esterling, University of California, RiversideWalter Williams, University of WashingtonDavis B. Bobrow, University of PittsburghDavid M. Jones, University of Wisconsin, OshkoshJohn C. Berg, Suffolk UniversityOverview: The panel will explore the processing of informationfor policymaking in the Federal Government; examine whetherit has declined in recent years; and whether the increasinglypartisan tone of Washington has caused the decline, if in fact itexists.127
- Page 1 and 2:
MidwestPolitical Science Associatio
- Page 4 and 5:
9-4 STATE BUILDING AND BUREAUCRATIC
- Page 6 and 7:
14-1 GLOBALIZATION AND SECURITYRoom
- Page 8 and 9:
PaperPaperDisc.The Divide: African
- Page 10 and 11: 29-210 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: CULTURE
- Page 12 and 13: PaperDisc.Defining Federalism: The
- Page 14 and 15: PaperDisc.estimates connections amo
- Page 16 and 17: 3-26 THE DETERMINANTS OF ECONOMICGR
- Page 18 and 19: PaperPaperPaperDisc.Bad Civil Socie
- Page 20 and 21: PaperPaperDisc.Voting Patterns in t
- Page 22 and 23: PaperDisc.'Going Local': Candidate
- Page 24 and 25: PaperPaperDisc.90Reflections on Lit
- Page 26 and 27: Presenter Out of Time: Examining th
- Page 28 and 29: is: to what extent are intergovernm
- Page 30 and 31: Presenter Economic Inequality, Its
- Page 32 and 33: PaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.during the
- Page 34 and 35: 10-3 BACK TO EUROPE? THE EU AND"EUR
- Page 36 and 37: PaperPaperPaperDisc.Interested Part
- Page 38 and 39: PaperPaperthatDisc.Don't Know, Don'
- Page 40 and 41: Disc.Suzanne Soule, Center for Civi
- Page 42 and 43: epistemology which is attentive to
- Page 44 and 45: 37-3 CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATIONA
- Page 46 and 47: 47-201 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: RELIGIO
- Page 48 and 49: PaperPaperDisc.terms and reciprocal
- Page 50 and 51: PaperPaperPaperDisc.116Education, E
- Page 52 and 53: 19-202 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: YOUNG A
- Page 54 and 55: 26-6 ASIAN AMERICAN POLITICSRoomCha
- Page 56 and 57: PaperPaperPaperDisc.of how partisan
- Page 58 and 59: PaperPaperDisc.124An Experimental S
- Page 62 and 63: Friday, April 21 - 8:30 am - 10:15
- Page 64 and 65: PaperPaperPaperDisc.The Determinant
- Page 66 and 67: PaperPaperDisc.A Simple Game-Theore
- Page 68 and 69: PaperDisc.partisans is causing chan
- Page 70 and 71: 28-201 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: DEWEY'S
- Page 72 and 73: 35-4 THE EFFECTS OF REDISTRICTING O
- Page 74 and 75: Presenter Regulation, Enforcement a
- Page 76 and 77: Friday, April 21 - 10: 30 am - 12:1
- Page 78 and 79: PaperPaperDisc.144Regional Minority
- Page 80 and 81: PaperPaperDisc.Administration of Gl
- Page 82 and 83: PaperPaperPaperDisc.The Paradox Soc
- Page 84 and 85: Disc.("Policy Mood") since 1972 usi
- Page 86 and 87: Disc.likelihood of a filibuster is
- Page 88 and 89: 38-301 POSTER SESSION: COMPARATIVEI
- Page 90 and 91: 54-1 SOCIAL ACTIVISM AND CIVICENGAG
- Page 92 and 93: 3-203 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: THE LEGA
- Page 94 and 95: PaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.Toward Res
- Page 96 and 97: Presenter The Shanghai Cooperation
- Page 98 and 99: PaperPaperPaperDisc.poised to becom
- Page 100 and 101: PaperDisc.chapter in Foucault's int
- Page 102 and 103: PaperDisc.Campaign Ad Images as Sig
- Page 104 and 105: 43-6 INDEPENDENT SCRUTINY OF AGENCI
- Page 106 and 107: Friday, April 21 - 3:45 pm - 5:30 p
- Page 108 and 109: 6-2 PARTIES AND PARTY DISCIPLINERoo
- Page 110 and 111:
PaperDisc.assesses the impact of co
- Page 112 and 113:
19-301 POSTER SESSION: VOTING BEHAV
- Page 114 and 115:
24-9 WHO LEADS: UNTANGLING THERELAT
- Page 116 and 117:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.182Understandin
- Page 118 and 119:
Paper The Rehnquist Court and the N
- Page 120 and 121:
PaperDisc.Revenge of Socialist Supe
- Page 122 and 123:
Saturday, April 22 - 8:30 am - 10:1
- Page 124 and 125:
PaperDisc.South Korean Public Opini
- Page 126 and 127:
PaperDisc.several other variables b
- Page 128 and 129:
22-15 PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL (Co-spo
- Page 130 and 131:
PaperDisc.never seems to provide us
- Page 132 and 133:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.Polarization an
- Page 134 and 135:
PaperDisc.Networks of Local Governm
- Page 136 and 137:
47-203 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: RELIGIO
- Page 138 and 139:
PaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.Between De
- Page 140 and 141:
11-9 NEW THEORIES AND THUS NEWDEBAT
- Page 142 and 143:
PaperPaperPaperAre Political Market
- Page 144 and 145:
26-9 MINORITY REPRESENTATIONRoomCha
- Page 146 and 147:
PaperDisc.Evolving Political Machin
- Page 148 and 149:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.economic gains
- Page 150 and 151:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.A Social Versus
- Page 152 and 153:
Saturday, April 21 - 1:45 pm - 3:30
- Page 154 and 155:
PaperPaperDisc.Riptides in Ontario:
- Page 156 and 157:
PaperPaperPaperDisc."works," a stat
- Page 158 and 159:
PaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.Preference
- Page 160 and 161:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.226that encoura
- Page 162 and 163:
32-12 POLITICAL PARTIES IN ELECTION
- Page 164 and 165:
PaperPaperDisc.Challenging Others o
- Page 166 and 167:
52-3 SOCIAL POLICIES: CHALLENGES AN
- Page 168 and 169:
Saturday, April 22 - 3:45 pm - 5:30
- Page 170 and 171:
PaperDisc.It's Not the Economy Stup
- Page 172 and 173:
15-10 DEMOCRACY, EQUALITY, AND PEAC
- Page 174 and 175:
Presenter Polarization, Public Opin
- Page 176 and 177:
PaperDisc.John S. Mill and Alexis d
- Page 178 and 179:
PaperDisc.Lobbying by Transportatio
- Page 180 and 181:
42-202 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: DOMESTI
- Page 182 and 183:
Presenter Female Athletes Making He
- Page 184 and 185:
PaperPaperDisc.Micro-Level Determin
- Page 186 and 187:
PaperDisc.Governmental Structure, P
- Page 188 and 189:
PaperDisc.Social Class Identity and
- Page 190 and 191:
33-9 PRESIDENTIAL-CONGRESSIONALRELA
- Page 192 and 193:
PaperPaperDisc.Equal Employment Opp
- Page 194 and 195:
Sunday, April 23 - 10:30 am - 12:15
- Page 196 and 197:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.State Legitimac
- Page 198 and 199:
18-14 THE STUDY AND MEASUREMENT OFR
- Page 200 and 201:
28-14 ROUSSEAU RECONSIDEREDRoomChai
- Page 202 and 203:
PaperDisc.The Judicial Treatment of