PaperPaperDisc.124An Experimental Study of the Influence of Precedent onViews of Legitimacy of Supreme Court DecisionsJames F. Spriggs, University of California, DavisJohn T. Scott, University of California, DavisJames R. Zink, University of California, DavisOverview: We use an experimental design to isolate the use ofprecedent in a judicial decision and determine its influence onthe degree to which a respondent agrees with the court decision.Separation of Powers and Judicial Legitimacy in LatinAmericanLee D. Walker, University of KentuckyOverview: This article examines directly the effect ofpresidential domination of the judiciary on citizens' attitudestoward the legitimacy of the judiciary using survey data in 5Latin American countries.Thomas G. Hansford, University of South Carolina38-11 CITIZENS MAKING POLICYRoomChairPaperPaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.TBA, Thur 3:45 pmE. L. Bernick, University of Nevada, Las VegasSame-Sex Marriage and State Ballot PropositionsArnold Fleischmann, University of GeorgiaLaura Moyer, University of GeorgiaOverview: This paper uses county-level data to analyze theresults of statewide referenda on same-sex marriage in 2004.Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: Gay Marriage Bansin the U.S. StatesDaniel C. Lewis, Michigan State UniversityOverview: This paper examines whether direct democracyincreases the probability of states' enacting measures whichrestrict minority rights. The question is addressed with ananalysis of the recent spate of gay marriage bans passed in theAmerican states.The Effects of Nonpartisan Redistricting Boards andCommissions on Competition in Congressional ElectionsJames B. Cottrill, Santa Clara UniversityOverview: This paper tests the claim that nonpartisanredistricting commissions increase competitiveness incongressional elections. Electoral data from 1972-2004 suggeststhat competition may indeed be enhanced through stateredistricting reform efforts.Analyzing the Impact of the Citizen Initiative on State FiscalPolicyMichael J. New, University of AlabamaOverview: A number of academic studies have found that stateswith the citizen initiative have lower taxes and less spendingthan other states. However, the academic literature has spentlittle time examining why this is the case.Term-Limits Induced Volatility in the Partisan Compositionof State LegislaturesRichard J. Powell, University of MaineOverview: “Term-Limits Induced Volatility in the PartisanComposition of State Legislatures”Justin H. Phillips, Columbia UniversityJohn A. Grummel, West Virginia State University38-101 ROUNDTABLE: INTERGOVERNMENTALCOORDINATION AND FEMA--POST-KATRINA: THE GOOD, THE BAD, ANDTHE UGLYRoomChairPanelistTBA, Thur 3:45 pmJ. Edwin Benton, University of South FloridaSaundra K. Schneider, Michigan State UniversityAnne Khademian, Virginia Polytechnical and State UniversityNelson Wikstrom, Virginia Commonwealth UniversityDeil S. Wright, University of North Carolina, Chapel HillDonald F. Kettl, University of PennslyvaniaOverview: This roundtable takes a critical scholarly andpractitioner look at the intergovernmental coordinationchallenges inherent in disaster preparation and relief. Areintergovernmental efforts doomed in light of the federalconfiguration of government, political turf wars, andself-serving dispositions of government bureaucrats?Discussion of these issues will be the focal point of thisroundtable.39-3 HOUSING PRICES AND LOCAL HOUSINGPOLICYRoomChairPaperPaperPaperDisc.TBA, Thur 3:45 pmTBARevitalizing NeighborhoodsMarilyn Dantico, Arizona State UniversityAlvin Mushkatel, Arizona State UniversityOverview: This paper looks at housing quality and other data toassess effects of comprehensive neighborhood initiatives inPhoenix, AZ.Homeowner and Neighborhood <strong>Association</strong> Influences onHousing PricesCharles Barrilleaux, Florida State UniversityTom Carsey, Florida State UniversityDaniel Scheller, Florida State UniversityOverview: We estimate the effects of neighborhoodcharacteristics, including governance provisions inneighborhood and homeowner association charters, on housingprices in a hedonic model.The Bonus of Affordable Housing: Analyzing California’sHousing Density Bonus LawJeffrey B. McLaughlin, University of California, RiversideMax Neiman, University of California, RiversideOverview: Our hypothesis is that administrative weaknesses inCalifornia state law have allowed localities to selectivelyimplement development policies that stress tax revenue streamsover policies that benefit housing for low to moderate incomeresidents.TBA40-2 AGENDA SETTING AND POLICY:CELEBRITIES, ENTREPRENEURS ANDORGANIZATIONSRoomChairPaperPaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.TBA, Thur 3:45 pmJeffrey S. Worsham, West Virginia UniversityWhat Has Jerry Lewis Wrought? An Analysis of the Role ofCelebrity in Agenda SettingIrene J. Barnett, Kent State UniversityTrudy Steuernagel, Kent State UniversityOverview: This paper aims to analyze the role of celebrity inagenda setting. Building on the theoretical model of Kingdon(1995), we propose to examine the role of celebrities in puttingtwo conditions, autism and Alzheimer’s, on the public agenda.Balancing Morality and Economy: The Case of StateHuman Cloning PoliciesBonnie Stabile, George Mason UniversityOverview: This paper investigates the question of which forceswithin individual states contribute most significantly to gettinghuman cloning on the legislative agenda and shaping anysubsequent policies.Federal-State <strong>Political</strong> Institutions and the NEA’s PolicyEntrepreneurshipGordon Shockley, Florida International UniversityOverview: The political institution of the federal-statepartnership in government support for the arts had developed tosuch an extent in the 1990s that it could provide crucialinstitutional support and set the backdrop for the NEA’s policyentrepreneurship.The Dynamics of Education Policy Agenda Setting: TheCase of School ChoiceMyung H. Jin, Florida State UniversityOverview: In the case of school choice, Kingdon's threestreams may have been necessary, but probably was notsufficient for the reform to reach the agenda. There had to be apre-existing institutional capacity that underpinned the efforts ofreformersAn Application of Punctuated Equilibrium TheoryNikkiter Ha-Kwan Chan, University of Hong KongOverview: TBAJeffrey S. Worsham, West Virginia University
40-18 UNDERSTANDING POLICY INNOVATIONSRoomChairPaperPaperTBA, Thur 3:45 pmAndrew Karch, University of Texas, AustinWhat Drives Diffusion? Non-Incremental Patterns of PolicyDiffusion in AmericaGraeme T. Boushey, University of WashingtonOverview: This paper draws upon research in agenda setting toexplain non-incremental patterns of policy diffusion. It modelspolicy adoption as a function of the number of state legislativeinstitutions and the density of interest groups within states.Regulatory Discretion and Policy Innovation: ImprovingPolicy Implementation Through Flexible ApproachesLada K. Dunbar, University of Michigan, DearbornOverview: This paper demonstrates that discretion, whichembraces the goal to improve policy implementation throughformal procedure and rule-specific innovation, offers a way tomore effective achievement of substantive policy and regulatorygoals.Paper Macro Policy in the United States (1789-2002)Nathan J. Kelly, University of TennesseeJ. Tobin Grant, Southern Illinois University, CarbondaleOverview: We measure legislative production over the entirehistory of the U.S. Congress, finding that institutional reform,societal change, and preference distributions are the mostimportant determinants of policy production.PaperDisc.Public Opinion, Saliency, and Public PolicyPeter B. Mortensen, Aarhus University, DenmarkOverview: This paper presents a new model of the relationshipbetween public opinion, saliency, and public policy. The modelis tested by the use of panel- and time-series regression on 8policy issues from 1980-2003.Thom Yantek, Kent State UniversityAndrew Karch, University of Texas, Austin41-1 SOCIAL WELFARE POLICYRoomChairPaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.TBA, Thur 3:45 pmNicole Kazee, Yale UniversitySocial Trailblazing or Abdication of Responsibility: AComparative Analysis of Social Devolution in Chile and inthe United StatesAdriela Fernandez, Governors State UniversityDonald Culverson, Governors State UniversityOverview: Since the 1980s social devolution has taken place inthe US and in Chile. This study seeks to answer: Whatmotivated this movement? What are the key issues surroundingthe privatized social services and what are the implications ofthis devolution.Analyzing Early Childcare Regulation in StatesJoohyun Kang, Florida State UniversityOverview: The purpose of research is to examine the policyprocessof childcare regulation in states and its impact on thesupply of childcare centers.Wal-Mart Welfare: Low-Wage Firms and AmericanAntipoverty PolicyNicole Kazee, Yale UniversityOverview: This paper explores the extent to which firms withlow-wage employees benefit from public, means-testedantipoverty programs, and suggests that we rethink ourexpectations of business influence in contemporary welfare statedevelopment.Social Policy and the Working Poor in the United States andCanadaDan M. Zuberi, University of British ColumbiaOverview: This paper explores how interactions between socialpolicy differences between the United States and Canada -specifically in the social welfare, employment, and health caredomains - affect working poverty in each country.TBA42-10 INTERESTS, INSTITUTIONS, ANDMONETARY POLICY (Co-Sponsored withInternational <strong>Political</strong> Economy, see 12-21)RoomChairPaperPaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.TBA, Thur 3:45 pmChristopher R. Way, Cornell University<strong>Political</strong> Business Cycle and Asset ConstructionJeffrey W. Ladewig, University of ConnecticutChris Andrews, University of ConnecticutJames Bourbeau, University of ConnecticutOverview: A re-examination of the monetary political businesscycle using new housing construction starts as a proxy formonetary policy.Partisan Politics and Federal Policy Choices: A Taylor RuleApproachJ. Kevin Corder, Western Michigan UniversityOverview: How do the President and the Congress affect thepolicy choices of the Federal Reserve System? The paper relieson vintage data and the Taylor rule to estimate the influence ofelected officials on Federal responses to output and inflationshocks.Exit, Promotion, or Loyalty? Comparative Evidence onCentral Bankers' Duration in OfficeChristopher Adolph, University of WashingtonOverview: Examines the effects of central bankers' careerbackgrounds, partisan governments, and economic conditionson the duration of central bankers' tenure in office using eventhistory analysis of comparative data.Dual Strategy: Central Banks, Risk Insurance and GrowthMaria Reyero, University of Michigan, Ann ArborOverview: In the context of the economic liberalization, centralbanks can act as an institutional ex-ante risk managementmechanism by sending positive signals for investment throughpolicy announcements (an informal instrument).Interests, Institutions, and Inflation in OECD: EmpiricalStudiesJulia H. Kim, University of California, Los AngelesOverview: In this paper, I answer the puzzle why partisangovernments do not produce expected partisan inflationarypolicy and outcome by looking at special interest groups andtheir interactions.Christopher R. Way, Cornell University43-5 RESPONSIVENESS ACROSS SECTORS:ROOTS, STRATEGIES, AND MEASURESRoomChairPaperPaperPaperTBA, Thur 3:45 pmKaifeng Yang, Florida State UniversityExploring Networks of Responsiveness Across Stages ofCollaborationThomas A. Bryer, University of Southern CaliforniaTerry L. Cooper, University of Southern CaliforniaOverview: This paper will present data from an action researchprogram that facilitates collaboration between a City of LosAngeles agency and four neighborhood councils. It will explorechanging network relations, perceptions and responsiveness ofthe agency.Stakeholder Orientation in Community Foundations' Use ofWeb TechnologiesChao Guo, Arizona State UniversityGregory Saxton, SUNY, BrockportWilliam Brown, Arizona State UniversityOverview: We examine the content of 120 communityfoundation websites to determine how-and how well-they areresponsive to and inclusive of key community stakeholders'interests in this online environment.Implementing Voluntary Agreements in StakeholderPartnershipsBill Leach, California State University, SacramentoBuzz Wiesenfield, Resolution Arts GroupOverview: We outline a framework for building assurances andenforcement mechanisms into consensus-based agreementsproduced by stakeholder partnerships. We then use theframework to examine implementation of the Sacramento WaterForum Agreement of 2000.125
- Page 1 and 2:
MidwestPolitical Science Associatio
- Page 4 and 5:
9-4 STATE BUILDING AND BUREAUCRATIC
- Page 6 and 7:
14-1 GLOBALIZATION AND SECURITYRoom
- Page 8 and 9: PaperPaperDisc.The Divide: African
- Page 10 and 11: 29-210 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: CULTURE
- Page 12 and 13: PaperDisc.Defining Federalism: The
- Page 14 and 15: PaperDisc.estimates connections amo
- Page 16 and 17: 3-26 THE DETERMINANTS OF ECONOMICGR
- Page 18 and 19: PaperPaperPaperDisc.Bad Civil Socie
- Page 20 and 21: PaperPaperDisc.Voting Patterns in t
- Page 22 and 23: PaperDisc.'Going Local': Candidate
- Page 24 and 25: PaperPaperDisc.90Reflections on Lit
- Page 26 and 27: Presenter Out of Time: Examining th
- Page 28 and 29: is: to what extent are intergovernm
- Page 30 and 31: Presenter Economic Inequality, Its
- Page 32 and 33: PaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.during the
- Page 34 and 35: 10-3 BACK TO EUROPE? THE EU AND"EUR
- Page 36 and 37: PaperPaperPaperDisc.Interested Part
- Page 38 and 39: PaperPaperthatDisc.Don't Know, Don'
- Page 40 and 41: Disc.Suzanne Soule, Center for Civi
- Page 42 and 43: epistemology which is attentive to
- Page 44 and 45: 37-3 CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATIONA
- Page 46 and 47: 47-201 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: RELIGIO
- Page 48 and 49: PaperPaperDisc.terms and reciprocal
- Page 50 and 51: PaperPaperPaperDisc.116Education, E
- Page 52 and 53: 19-202 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: YOUNG A
- Page 54 and 55: 26-6 ASIAN AMERICAN POLITICSRoomCha
- Page 56 and 57: PaperPaperPaperDisc.of how partisan
- Page 60 and 61: PaperPaperDisc.Policy Windows, Atte
- Page 62 and 63: Friday, April 21 - 8:30 am - 10:15
- Page 64 and 65: PaperPaperPaperDisc.The Determinant
- Page 66 and 67: PaperPaperDisc.A Simple Game-Theore
- Page 68 and 69: PaperDisc.partisans is causing chan
- Page 70 and 71: 28-201 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: DEWEY'S
- Page 72 and 73: 35-4 THE EFFECTS OF REDISTRICTING O
- Page 74 and 75: Presenter Regulation, Enforcement a
- Page 76 and 77: Friday, April 21 - 10: 30 am - 12:1
- Page 78 and 79: PaperPaperDisc.144Regional Minority
- Page 80 and 81: PaperPaperDisc.Administration of Gl
- Page 82 and 83: PaperPaperPaperDisc.The Paradox Soc
- Page 84 and 85: Disc.("Policy Mood") since 1972 usi
- Page 86 and 87: Disc.likelihood of a filibuster is
- Page 88 and 89: 38-301 POSTER SESSION: COMPARATIVEI
- Page 90 and 91: 54-1 SOCIAL ACTIVISM AND CIVICENGAG
- Page 92 and 93: 3-203 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: THE LEGA
- Page 94 and 95: PaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.Toward Res
- Page 96 and 97: Presenter The Shanghai Cooperation
- Page 98 and 99: PaperPaperPaperDisc.poised to becom
- Page 100 and 101: PaperDisc.chapter in Foucault's int
- Page 102 and 103: PaperDisc.Campaign Ad Images as Sig
- Page 104 and 105: 43-6 INDEPENDENT SCRUTINY OF AGENCI
- Page 106 and 107: Friday, April 21 - 3:45 pm - 5:30 p
- Page 108 and 109:
6-2 PARTIES AND PARTY DISCIPLINERoo
- Page 110 and 111:
PaperDisc.assesses the impact of co
- Page 112 and 113:
19-301 POSTER SESSION: VOTING BEHAV
- Page 114 and 115:
24-9 WHO LEADS: UNTANGLING THERELAT
- Page 116 and 117:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.182Understandin
- Page 118 and 119:
Paper The Rehnquist Court and the N
- Page 120 and 121:
PaperDisc.Revenge of Socialist Supe
- Page 122 and 123:
Saturday, April 22 - 8:30 am - 10:1
- Page 124 and 125:
PaperDisc.South Korean Public Opini
- Page 126 and 127:
PaperDisc.several other variables b
- Page 128 and 129:
22-15 PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL (Co-spo
- Page 130 and 131:
PaperDisc.never seems to provide us
- Page 132 and 133:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.Polarization an
- Page 134 and 135:
PaperDisc.Networks of Local Governm
- Page 136 and 137:
47-203 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: RELIGIO
- Page 138 and 139:
PaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.Between De
- Page 140 and 141:
11-9 NEW THEORIES AND THUS NEWDEBAT
- Page 142 and 143:
PaperPaperPaperAre Political Market
- Page 144 and 145:
26-9 MINORITY REPRESENTATIONRoomCha
- Page 146 and 147:
PaperDisc.Evolving Political Machin
- Page 148 and 149:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.economic gains
- Page 150 and 151:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.A Social Versus
- Page 152 and 153:
Saturday, April 21 - 1:45 pm - 3:30
- Page 154 and 155:
PaperPaperDisc.Riptides in Ontario:
- Page 156 and 157:
PaperPaperPaperDisc."works," a stat
- Page 158 and 159:
PaperPaperPaperPaperDisc.Preference
- Page 160 and 161:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.226that encoura
- Page 162 and 163:
32-12 POLITICAL PARTIES IN ELECTION
- Page 164 and 165:
PaperPaperDisc.Challenging Others o
- Page 166 and 167:
52-3 SOCIAL POLICIES: CHALLENGES AN
- Page 168 and 169:
Saturday, April 22 - 3:45 pm - 5:30
- Page 170 and 171:
PaperDisc.It's Not the Economy Stup
- Page 172 and 173:
15-10 DEMOCRACY, EQUALITY, AND PEAC
- Page 174 and 175:
Presenter Polarization, Public Opin
- Page 176 and 177:
PaperDisc.John S. Mill and Alexis d
- Page 178 and 179:
PaperDisc.Lobbying by Transportatio
- Page 180 and 181:
42-202 INFORMAL ROUNDTABLE: DOMESTI
- Page 182 and 183:
Presenter Female Athletes Making He
- Page 184 and 185:
PaperPaperDisc.Micro-Level Determin
- Page 186 and 187:
PaperDisc.Governmental Structure, P
- Page 188 and 189:
PaperDisc.Social Class Identity and
- Page 190 and 191:
33-9 PRESIDENTIAL-CONGRESSIONALRELA
- Page 192 and 193:
PaperPaperDisc.Equal Employment Opp
- Page 194 and 195:
Sunday, April 23 - 10:30 am - 12:15
- Page 196 and 197:
PaperPaperPaperDisc.State Legitimac
- Page 198 and 199:
18-14 THE STUDY AND MEASUREMENT OFR
- Page 200 and 201:
28-14 ROUSSEAU RECONSIDEREDRoomChai
- Page 202 and 203:
PaperDisc.The Judicial Treatment of