Works Approval Report.pdf - the National Capital Authority
Works Approval Report.pdf - the National Capital Authority
Works Approval Report.pdf - the National Capital Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Campbell Section 5 - <strong>Works</strong> <strong>Approval</strong> Project Ref: 110029Prepared for <strong>the</strong> Land Development AgencyAGENCY NO COMMENTS PROPONENT’SRESPONSEParade.DATERECEIVEDExisting trees and proposed trees –Eucalyptus cinerea are proposed –this species is generally notconsidered suitable for street treeplanting anymore, it needs a largespace to develop where it will notimpact on adjacent people andproperty (<strong>the</strong>re is a 2.5m wide pathand kerbside parking proposed thatwould be beneath <strong>the</strong>se treecanopies). The proposed treespacing is too crowded, and <strong>the</strong>reis only 1.5m between alignments of<strong>the</strong> existing and proposedtrees. Need to critically assess <strong>the</strong>space available for proposed treesto ensure <strong>the</strong>y can be planted andsuccessfully develop alongside <strong>the</strong>existing trees.What is <strong>the</strong> proposed surfacetreatment for this verge? How willthis be installed with appropriateprotection of existing trees?Eucalyptus cinerea –generally a large spacehas been allowed fordevelopment of eachtree – <strong>the</strong> pedestrianpath is now kerbsidewhich has a reducedimpact on <strong>the</strong> existingcanopy and root zone.Buildings are setbackbetween 2 and 8m from<strong>the</strong> boundary. E. cinereais favoured by <strong>the</strong> NCAto provide necessarylevel of screening alongthis edge.Proposed treatment ofthis verge – grassStreetscape Trees – (*) <strong>the</strong> treetype for all locations proposed mustmeet TAMS Design Standards,check for minimum verge width andall clearance requirements inrelation to <strong>the</strong> size and shape of<strong>the</strong> tree.Streetscape trees havebeen reviewed. Pleasesee Appendix 11.Tree spacing must allow for treesto develop to mature canopy sizewithout interfering with adjacenttree/s – many of <strong>the</strong> spacingsindicated are too close.o T1 Eucalyptus mannifera ‘LittleSpotty’ – tree type supported,but minimum clearances mustbe met for road and path.o T2 Ulmus parvifolia – mustspecify what cultivar / varietyis proposed. Will need tomeet minimum verge widthand clearance requirements.o T3 Eucalyptus ovata – notsupported (not in TAMSDesign Standards)o T4 Zelkova serrata –supported.o T5 Eucalyptus mannifera –Appendix 11Appendix 11Appendix 11Appendix 11Appendix 11November 2012 Cardno 93