12.07.2015 Views

Works Approval Report.pdf - the National Capital Authority

Works Approval Report.pdf - the National Capital Authority

Works Approval Report.pdf - the National Capital Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Campbell Section 5 - <strong>Works</strong> <strong>Approval</strong> Project Ref: 110029Prepared for <strong>the</strong> Land Development AgencyAGENCY NO COMMENTS PROPONENT’SRESPONSEParade.DATERECEIVEDExisting trees and proposed trees –Eucalyptus cinerea are proposed –this species is generally notconsidered suitable for street treeplanting anymore, it needs a largespace to develop where it will notimpact on adjacent people andproperty (<strong>the</strong>re is a 2.5m wide pathand kerbside parking proposed thatwould be beneath <strong>the</strong>se treecanopies). The proposed treespacing is too crowded, and <strong>the</strong>reis only 1.5m between alignments of<strong>the</strong> existing and proposedtrees. Need to critically assess <strong>the</strong>space available for proposed treesto ensure <strong>the</strong>y can be planted andsuccessfully develop alongside <strong>the</strong>existing trees.What is <strong>the</strong> proposed surfacetreatment for this verge? How willthis be installed with appropriateprotection of existing trees?Eucalyptus cinerea –generally a large spacehas been allowed fordevelopment of eachtree – <strong>the</strong> pedestrianpath is now kerbsidewhich has a reducedimpact on <strong>the</strong> existingcanopy and root zone.Buildings are setbackbetween 2 and 8m from<strong>the</strong> boundary. E. cinereais favoured by <strong>the</strong> NCAto provide necessarylevel of screening alongthis edge.Proposed treatment ofthis verge – grassStreetscape Trees – (*) <strong>the</strong> treetype for all locations proposed mustmeet TAMS Design Standards,check for minimum verge width andall clearance requirements inrelation to <strong>the</strong> size and shape of<strong>the</strong> tree.Streetscape trees havebeen reviewed. Pleasesee Appendix 11.Tree spacing must allow for treesto develop to mature canopy sizewithout interfering with adjacenttree/s – many of <strong>the</strong> spacingsindicated are too close.o T1 Eucalyptus mannifera ‘LittleSpotty’ – tree type supported,but minimum clearances mustbe met for road and path.o T2 Ulmus parvifolia – mustspecify what cultivar / varietyis proposed. Will need tomeet minimum verge widthand clearance requirements.o T3 Eucalyptus ovata – notsupported (not in TAMSDesign Standards)o T4 Zelkova serrata –supported.o T5 Eucalyptus mannifera –Appendix 11Appendix 11Appendix 11Appendix 11Appendix 11November 2012 Cardno 93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!