12.07.2015 Views

PhD Thesis - Energy Systems Research Unit - University of Strathclyde

PhD Thesis - Energy Systems Research Unit - University of Strathclyde

PhD Thesis - Energy Systems Research Unit - University of Strathclyde

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

analysis in the case <strong>of</strong> the intermediate season) were then extrapolated to obtainmonthly data for the individual scenarios. Aggregation <strong>of</strong> the monthly resultsproduced the seasonal and eventually the annual results which can then be used tocompare the different scenarios modelled.An important aspect in such a type <strong>of</strong> modelling is the choice <strong>of</strong> characteristic weeksused for the analysis. Ortiga et al. in [8], propose a graphical method based on subdivingthe annual cumulative energy demand into a number <strong>of</strong> representative timeperiods to aid in selecting characteristic days for optimisation processes involvingcogeneration and trigeneration models; they explain that as long as the selected daysare chosen using this method, the number <strong>of</strong> representative days chosen to representa whole year worth <strong>of</strong> data does not really influence the results obtained. Theresearch in this thesis was however different as its objective was not to optimise asystem but rather to use a combined deterministic/sensitivity analysis approach tocompare different demand-supply scenarios. In this thesis therefore rather than theabsolute results (which were still important), what was being sought was tounderstand the effect different operating conditions have on micro-trigeneration, bycomparing the results to a base case scenario. As long as the same time periods wereused to create the aggregated seasonal and annual performance metrics for thedifferent scenarios, the selection <strong>of</strong> typical days was therefore less <strong>of</strong> an issue. Twoseparate week-long simulations per month were considered to be a reasonablerepresentation <strong>of</strong> the diversity experienced over a month. In the case <strong>of</strong> theintermediate season the fact that the micro-trigeneration system supplied only hotwater demand (which shows little climatic influence) during all the months <strong>of</strong> thatseason, justifies the use <strong>of</strong> only one week-long simulation for each month.4.2 Analysis metricsThe type <strong>of</strong> analysis used to assess the different scenarios simulated relies on a‘traditional’ analysis <strong>of</strong> a project’s energetic, environmental and economicperformance. Using a combined deterministic approach and sensitivity analysismethodology as explained in Chapter 1, for each scenario listed in Table 4.1 anumber <strong>of</strong> performance metrics from each category were used to assess that scenario.144

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!