13.07.2015 Views

The Rainforests of Cameroon - PROFOR

The Rainforests of Cameroon - PROFOR

The Rainforests of Cameroon - PROFOR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

54 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Rainforests</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cameroon</strong>to enter into collaborative agreements to obtain services provided by theprivate sector, communes, local communities, and NGOs. Reorganization<strong>of</strong> the National Office <strong>of</strong> Forest Development (Office National de Développementdes Forêts, ONADEF) typified the broad need to align forestinstitutions and their functions with the new policies. ONADEF hadbeen created before the first ministry in charge <strong>of</strong> forestry (which wasMINEF, in 1992) was established and before adoption <strong>of</strong> the 1994 ForestLaw. A parastatal in charge <strong>of</strong> industrial reforestation and promotingtimber use, ONADEF had a monopoly on forest inventories and managementplans, a status that ran counter to the development <strong>of</strong> consultingservices in the private sector and fueled the conviction that corruptionand clientelism dominated its workings. Resistance predictably delayedthe process, but ONADEF had no place in the new institutional settingand was eventually dissolved in 2002. A review <strong>of</strong> forest institutions in2002 strongly influenced preparation <strong>of</strong> the National Forest and EnvironmentSector Program (FESP), which helped to speed institutional change(including budgetary change; see the next section). ONADEF was succeededby the Agence Nationale d’Appui au Développement Forestier(ANAFOR), whose mandate is to promote financially and environmentallyviable plantations established, owned, and financed by individualfarmers, communities, and the private sector. 7Aligning Sector Expenditures with Policy ObjectivesUntil the FESP began in 2004, national budget allocations to the ForestAdministration were quite modest and did not reflect its changedfunctions. Funding for the core functions <strong>of</strong> planning, control, and lawenforcement remained largely limited to wages. Any major innovationswere funded either from extrabudgetary, ad hoc resources provided bythe Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance or donors. ONADEF—despite its clear irrelevancein the context <strong>of</strong> the reforms—absorbed half <strong>of</strong> forest sector fundsuntil its demise (I&D 2002). <strong>The</strong> cash pumped into ONADEF’s reforestationprograms and manufacturing activities created immense opportunitiesto sustain the patronage system.In 2004, with the implementation <strong>of</strong> the FESP and support from theinternational community, a major effort began to align the budget to forestpolicy for the first Delivered time (box by <strong>The</strong> 3.7). World Budgetary Bank e-library planning to: directly reflects<strong>The</strong> World Bankthe objectives specified in the IP 2005 : 192.86.100.34 Forest and Environment Sector PolicyLetter (appendix 6). A Medium-term Mon, 09 Nov 2009 Expenditure 17:06:18 Framework has beenadopted in which the headings and corresponding expenditures are clearlyrelated to those in the policy letter. Although financial resources are now(c) <strong>The</strong> International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / <strong>The</strong> World Bank

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!