13.07.2015 Views

Arab Knowledge Report 2009: Towards Productive

Arab Knowledge Report 2009: Towards Productive

Arab Knowledge Report 2009: Towards Productive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Joint researchprojects among <strong>Arab</strong>scientific researchinstitutions workingin similar fieldsremain extremelyrare even withinthe same countryThe largest and mostsignificant proportionof funding for most<strong>Arab</strong> research centrescomes from the stateThe obstacles tofunding and the lackof incentive-drivenwork opportunitiesfor researchers areamong the reasonsfor most <strong>Arab</strong>countries’ weaknessin research. This iscompounded by adearth of research,and the scarcity ofsupport offeredby public andprivate industrypalm tree research in a number of Gulfcountries, agricultural research in Egypt,Syria, Morocco, and Sudan, and linguisticresearch in the Maghreb. Surprisingly, jointresearch projects among <strong>Arab</strong> scientificresearch institutions working in similarfields remain extremely rare even withinthe same country. The joint projectscurrently being implemented focus onpartnerships with Western industrial states(Figure 5-4) and the exchange of scientificvisits and training, especially when fundingis available. This situation results inpersistently weak impact.With regard to the structure of <strong>Arab</strong>research and development centres, theyfunction through ministries of highereducation and scientific research (eightcountries), ministries of education (threecountries), and a ministry of planning (onecountry), in addition to some specialisedministries (agriculture, health, industry).Five <strong>Arab</strong> countries (Lebanon, Kuwait,Bahrain, the UAE, and Qatar) show anexception to this trend, having assignedthe task of research and developmentto relatively independent councils andacademies (Nabil ‘Abd al-Majid Salih,2008, in <strong>Arab</strong>ic). Egypt currently hasthe largest number of research centres(fourteen specialised government researchcentres, 219 research centres under theauspices of ministries, and 114 centres atuniversities). In Tunisia, there are thirtythreeresearch centres comprising 139laboratories and 643 branch research units.Technological research cities are few andare limited to Egypt, Saudi <strong>Arab</strong>ia, andTunisia (UNECA, 2008, in French). Otherserious attempts exist in the <strong>Arab</strong> region,such as the Science and Technology Oasisthat functions under the umbrella of theQatar Foundation and sponsors numerousscientific and developmental studies.The largest and most significantproportion of funding for most <strong>Arab</strong>research centres comes from the state.In Morocco, Tunisia, and Algeria, forexample, research institutions enjoy closerelations with the public sector and thestate, which in return expects from thema considerable contribution to social andeconomic development programmes.These institutions have recently begun totake an important step toward developingself-evaluation tools, yet they also continueto suffer from centralised decision-makingand their ties to state funding, despite theirincreasing access to bilateral Europeanprogrammes and Euromed programmes.The obstacles to funding and the lack ofincentive-driven work opportunities forresearchers are among the reasons for most<strong>Arab</strong> countries’ weakness in research. Thisis compounded by a dearth of research,and the scarcity of support offered bypublic and private industry.Based on the analysis of the availabledata on research and innovation practicesand outputs, <strong>Arab</strong> countries can beclassified in one of three models: 5Model one: Countries whose researchcentres are characterised by a highlycentralised administration and abureaucratic relationship with the publicsector. The funding for these researchcentres is limited to state contributions, andthey show no diversity in their financial orhuman resources. The missions of theseresearch centres and their programmesare burdened with scientific servicesrequired by public utilities. As such, theircontribution to the production of originalresearch and patents are limited and theydo not include all scientific specialisations(Syria, Libya, Algeria, Sudan).Model two: Countries whose centresare characterised by flexibility in theirrelationship with the public sector anddiversity in their funding sources andhuman resources. Their most significantresearch production, however, remainswithin the institutions that are able todraw international support and buildpartnerships with industry . The institutionswithin this model show promisingdynamism, yet they are also characterisedby the frequently brief tenure of theirexperts and their intensive domestic andinternational travel (Tunisia, Lebanon,Jordan).Model three: Countries whose centres188 ARAB KNOWLEDGE REPORT <strong>2009</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!