13.07.2015 Views

Arab Knowledge Report 2009: Towards Productive

Arab Knowledge Report 2009: Towards Productive

Arab Knowledge Report 2009: Towards Productive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

are characterised by flexibility towards,and sometimes independence from, thepublic sector, as well as by diversity offunding sources, and the ability to attractspecialists from abroad and guarantee therelative stability of national specialists. Asignificant percentage of their scientificproduction comes from universities andprivate centres, and they are able tobenefit from international cooperationprogrammes and from partnerships withservice and industry sectors, as well asfrom independent national support funds(the UAE, Qatar).THE CAPACITY OF RESEARCHCENTRES FOR INNOVATIONDue to the lack of detailed and reliable data,it is difficult to conduct a comprehensiveevaluation of the capacity of scientificresearch institutions for innovation, bothfor the <strong>Arab</strong> countries in general and onan individual country basis. The reportsof the World Economic Forum (WorldEconomic Forum, 2008-<strong>2009</strong>) list anumber of composite indicators thatprovide a preliminary ranking of <strong>Arab</strong>countries on the basis of the quality oftheir research centres’ production and theassimilation of information technologyinto their activities (Tables 5-1 and 5-2).Tables 5-1 and 5-2 above rankfourteen <strong>Arab</strong> countries that containmore than three-quarters of the <strong>Arab</strong>region’s population; Malaysia and Turkeyare added for comparison. The mostconspicuous facts reflected by the data arethe following:• Qatar obtained a relatively acceptableranking on the global level and first placeamong the <strong>Arab</strong> countries (rank, thirty),while four <strong>Arab</strong> countries (Tunisia,Jordan, Saudi <strong>Arab</strong>ia, and Kuwait)attained middling ranks (forty-second,fifty-first, fifty-second, and fifty-fourthrespectively) with regard to the qualityof their research institutions. Theremaining <strong>Arab</strong> countries covered bythe report placed lower on the list.Malaysian research centres, known forTABLE 5-1CountryThe quality of <strong>Arab</strong> research institutions 6The quality of <strong>Arab</strong> research institutionsRank among 134 countries Rank among <strong>Arab</strong> countriesQatar 30 1Tunisia 42 2Jordan 51 3Saudi <strong>Arab</strong>ia 52 4Kuwait 54 5Oman 59 6UAE 74 7Syria 89 8Morocco 94 9Egypt 96 10Bahrain 100 11Algeria 108 12Turkey 52 ..Malaysia 20 ..Source: The World Economic Forum, 2008bTABLE 5-2CountryRanking of <strong>Arab</strong> countries in the Assimilation ofTechnology index 7 (out of 134 countries)Technology assimilation atthe institutional levelNetworkedreadinessUAE 14 27Qatar 40 29Tunisia 34 38Bahrain 36 37Oman 95 50Kuwait 28 57Jordan 35 44Egypt 63 76Morocco 70 86Syria 87 94Libya 97 101Algeria 128 108Mauritania 79 109Saudi <strong>Arab</strong>ia 44 40Malaysia 21 28Turkey 48 61Sources: World Economic Forum website http://www.weforum.org/pdf/gitr/<strong>2009</strong>/rankings/pdf on 12 June <strong>2009</strong>.ARAB PERFORMANCE IN RESEARCH AND INNOVATION189

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!