13.07.2015 Views

NIST Technical Note 1337: Characterization of Clocks and Oscillators

NIST Technical Note 1337: Characterization of Clocks and Oscillators

NIST Technical Note 1337: Characterization of Clocks and Oscillators

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The UxCt) function for flicker noise PH isextremely complicated <strong>and</strong> has not been developed,but one can arrive at an empirical value for it.The Ux(t) function is derivable for the otherpower law spectral processes. Table 2 gives therelationships between the time domain measureHod Gy2 (t) <strong>and</strong> its power law spectral counterpart,given in Eq. 1. Also listed in the right h<strong>and</strong>column <strong>of</strong> Table 2 are the asymptotic values<strong>of</strong> R(n):Ho1n Typ.M....TABLE 2at")Mod a/(t) C~nt n' •3 f hWhIte PPI +2 hacth2'~1.038 -+ 31n(w t)Flic:t.r PM +1hE~iricalhI'(20»"­R(n)""'ft. FN 0 hO'~ fJcac:t 0.5Fl1c:ker FM -1 h. Z1n(2) • R(n) [_pci r1 CI.'; Exa.c:t o. G74IA"atlablea.ndo. Val k FH -2 h_ ' ( 2n tt • R(n) £~it'icAl; Exact 0.824ZAllailabl.It is clear from Table 2 that Mod 0 y2(t) isvery useful for white PM <strong>and</strong> flicker noise PH, butfor a < +1 the conventional Allan variance, Oy2(t),gives both an easier-to-interpret <strong>and</strong> an easier-to·calculate measure <strong>of</strong> stability.It is interesting to make a graph <strong>of</strong> a versusIJ for both the ordinary Allan variance <strong>and</strong> themodified Allan variance. Shown in Fig. 2.is sucha graph. This graph allows one to determine powerlaw spectra for non-interger as well as intergervalues <strong>of</strong> C1. The dashed 1ine for the modifiedAllan variance has been intentionally moved to the1eft in Fig. 2 because for small va 1ues <strong>of</strong> n thevalue <strong>of</strong> ~ will appear to be slightly more negativethat for O/(t), even though for large n, theyboth approach the same slope (i.e., the samevalues <strong>of</strong> IJ). In fact, in the asymtotic 1imit,the equation relating IJ <strong>and</strong> C1 for the modifiedAllan variance isa = -IJ -I, for -3 < a < +3 . (17)'" See Appendix <strong>Note</strong> # 34*The value <strong>of</strong> IJ = -4 for a = +3 was verified empiricallywith simulated data, <strong>and</strong> it appears thatfor a > +3, IJ remains at -4.A direct application for using the modifiedAllan variance recently arose in the analysis <strong>of</strong>atomic clock data as received from a GlobalPositioning System (GPS) sate11 ite. We wereinterested in knowing the short-term characteristics<strong>of</strong> the newly developed, high-accuracy NBS/GPSreceiver, as well as the propagation fluctuations.Fig. 3 shows both 0 2(t) <strong>and</strong> Mod ayy2(t) for comparison.Using Mod 0 2(1), ywe can tell that thefundamental limiting noise process involved ih thesystem is white noise PH with the exciting resultthat averaging for four minutes can allow one toascertain time difference to better than onenanosecond excluding other systematic effects.ConclusionWe have developed a supplemental measure, the"Modified Allan Variance" (Mod 0/(1»), which hasvery useful properties when analyzing oscillatoror signal stability in the presence <strong>of</strong> white noisephase modulation or flicker noise phase modulation.It also works reasonably well as a stabilitymeasure for other commonly occuring noise processesin precision oscillators.We would recommend that for most time domainanalysis, 0 2(1) should be the first choice. Ifya 2(1) depends on t as t- 1 , then the modi fi edyAllan variance can be used as a substitute to helpremove the ambiguity as to the noise processes.~cknow1edgmentsThe authors are deeply grateful for stimulatingdiscussions with Dr. James J. Snyder, <strong>and</strong>for the useful comments <strong>of</strong> Dr. Robert Kamper <strong>and</strong>Mr. David A. Howe.References1. James A. Barnes, Andrew R. Chi, Leonard S.Cutler, Daniel J. Healey, David B. Leeson,Tomas E. HcGunical, James A. MUllen, Jr.,Warren L. Smith,' Richard L. Sydnor, Robert F.C. Vessot, <strong>and</strong> Gernot M. R. Winkler, Proc.IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 1M-20, 105 (1971);also pub1 ished as NBS Tech. <strong>Note</strong> 394 (1971).2. David W. Allan, Proc. IEEE 54, 221 (1966).3. R. F. C. Vessot, Proc. 1EEE'54, 199 (1966).4. James J. Snyder, Proc. 35th Annual Symp. onFreq. Control (1981), to be pub1 ished.473TN-257

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!