13.07.2015 Views

NIST Technical Note 1337: Characterization of Clocks and Oscillators

NIST Technical Note 1337: Characterization of Clocks and Oscillators

NIST Technical Note 1337: Characterization of Clocks and Oscillators

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

336IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, VOL. IM-B, NO.4, DECEMBER 1984The EMA V is a r<strong>and</strong>om function <strong>of</strong> m. Its calculation requiresan observatlOn tIme <strong>of</strong> duration 3m1.We consider f, the fractional deviation <strong>of</strong> the EMAV relativeto the modified Allan variance defined as follows:f= Mod &;(1) - Mod a~(1)Moda~(r) (16)The st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation a(f) <strong>of</strong>f dermes the relative uncertaintyon the measurement <strong>of</strong> the modified Allan variance due to thefinite number <strong>of</strong> averaging cycles. We have 'a(e) = M d 2 ( ) {a 2 [Mod a;(1)1p/2 (I 7)o 0y 12 A2where a [Mod ay(r)J denotes the true variance <strong>of</strong> the EMAVsuch asa 2 [Mod &;(1)J = {(Mod a;(r)J 2 )- [Mod 0;. (r») 2. (18)We assume that the fluctuations y(t) are normally distributed[1O]. One can therefore express ([Mod a; (1')] 2) asm 2 ([Mod 0;(1')]2)= (m 2 + 2m) [Mod a~(r)J2+ 4 mil (m - P){2 1: (n - i)In o}2 +nI (19)pc I1= Iwhere In are integrals which depend on n <strong>and</strong> on the noise process.We have281l'21'2 n In = I" ~ S (f)cos 61l'np[roo .fX {6 cos 21f[TO i - 4 cos 21l'[ToU + n)- 4 cos 21l'[roU - n) + cos 21l'.f100 + 2n)+ cos 21l'[TO(i - 2n)} df. (20)For each noise component, the expression for a(e) can bededuced from the calculation <strong>of</strong> integrals involved in (20).These expressions are generally lengthy <strong>and</strong> complicated exceptfor white phase <strong>and</strong> white frequency noise modulations, whereintegrals In equal zero. We have limited the present analysisto these two noise components. We get for a(l:)2a(e)=-, for 0: = 2 <strong>and</strong> O. (21)mWe now compare (21) with previously published results relatedto the estimate <strong>of</strong> the Allan variance [5 J. For a given timeobservation <strong>of</strong> duration 3m1', it can be easily deduced from(5) that the relative uncertainty on the estimate <strong>of</strong> the Allanvariance varies asymptotically as 1.14 m- 1/2 <strong>and</strong> 1.0 m -112 for0: = 2 <strong>and</strong> 0, respectively. For these two noise components, theuncertainty on the EMA V is larger than the uncertainty on theestimated Allan variance, but <strong>of</strong> the same order <strong>of</strong> magnitude.V. CONCLUSIONWe have calculated the analytical expression for the modifiedAllan variance for each component <strong>of</strong> the model usuallyconsidered to characterize r<strong>and</strong>om frequency fluctuations inprecision oscillators. These expressions have been comparedwith previously published results <strong>and</strong> the link between theAllan variance <strong>and</strong> the modified Allan variance has beenspecified.The uncertainty on the estimate <strong>of</strong> the modified Allan vari­0018-9456/84/0900-0336$01.00 © 1984 IEEEance h~s been studied <strong>and</strong> numerical values have been reportedfor white phase <strong>and</strong> white frequency noise modulations.In conclusion, the modified Allan variance appears to be wellsuited for removing the ambiguity between white <strong>and</strong> flickerphase noise modulation. Nevertheless, the calculation <strong>of</strong> themodified Allan variance requires signal processing which iscomplicated, compared to the Allan variance. In the presence<strong>of</strong> white or flicker phase noise, the Allan variance cannot beeasily deduced from the modified Allan variance. Furthermore,for a given source exhibiting differen t noise components,the determination <strong>of</strong> the Allan variance from the modifiedone is difficult to perform. For most <strong>of</strong> time-domain measurements,the use <strong>of</strong> the Allan variance is preferred.ACKNOWLEDGMENTThe authors would like to express their thanks to Dr. ClaudeAudoin for constructive discussions <strong>and</strong> valuable comments onthe manuscript.REFERENCES(1) D. W. Allan, "Statistics <strong>of</strong> atomic frequency st<strong>and</strong>ards," Proc.IEEE, voL 54, pp. 221-230, Feb. 1966.[2J J. A. Barnes et 01., "<strong>Characterization</strong> <strong>of</strong> frequency stability,"IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meat., vol. 1M-20, pp. 105-120, May 1971.[3] L. S. Cutler <strong>and</strong> C. L. Searle, "Some aspects <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>and</strong>measurement <strong>of</strong> frequency fluctuations in frequency st<strong>and</strong>ards,"Proc. IEEE. vol. 54, pp. 136-154, Feb. 1966.[4) J. Rutman, "<strong>Characterization</strong> <strong>of</strong> phase <strong>and</strong> frequency instabilitiesin precision frequency sources: Fifteen years <strong>of</strong> progress," Proc.IEEE, vol. 66, pp. 1048-1075, Sept 1978.[5 J P. Lesage <strong>and</strong> C.· Audoin, "Effect <strong>of</strong> dead-time on the estimation<strong>of</strong> the two-sample variance," IEEE Trans. Insrrum. Meas .. volIM-28, pp. 6-10, Mar. 1979.16) J. J. Snyder, "Algorithm for fast digital analysis <strong>of</strong> interferencefringes," AppL Opt., vol 19, pp. 1223-1225, Apr. 1980.(7] -, "An ultra-high resolution frequency meter," in Proc. 35thAnnu. Symp. Frequency ConTrol (Fort Monmouth, NJ), 1981,pp.464-469.[8] D. W. Allan <strong>and</strong> J. A. Barnes, "A modified Allan variance withincreased oscillator characterization ability," in Proc. 35th Annu.Symp. Frequency ConTrol (Fort Monmouth, NJ), 1981, pp. 470­474.(9) B. Picinbono, "Processus de diffusion et stationnarite," C.R.Acad. Sci., vol 271, pp. 661-664, Oct 1970.(10) P. Lesage <strong>and</strong> C. Audoin, "CharacteriZation <strong>of</strong> frequency stability:Uncertainty due to the finite number <strong>of</strong> measurements,"IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol IM·22, pp. 157-161. June 1973.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!