30.07.2015 Views

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal ... - IndianCoins.org

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal ... - IndianCoins.org

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal ... - IndianCoins.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58 NUMISMATIC CHRONICLE.<strong>of</strong> Leontine independence by Dion in 356 B.C. <strong>The</strong>companion issue <strong>of</strong> Syracuse itself doubtless dates from<strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> his expedition in 357 B.C., <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> introduction<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se Tr&Aot with <strong>the</strong> civic name <strong>of</strong>Syracuse is only one more example<strong>of</strong> Dion's Corinthianizingpolicy.We have <strong>the</strong>refore strong reasons for believing that<strong>the</strong> Corinthian stater<strong>of</strong> Terina, which agrees so closelyboth in style <strong>and</strong> design with <strong>the</strong>se alliance pieces <strong>of</strong>Syracuse <strong>and</strong> Leontinoi, was also struck about <strong>the</strong> time<strong>of</strong> Dion's expedition.It would appear, however, that when very shortlyafter this date <strong>the</strong> Brettians had asserted <strong>the</strong>ir dominionat Terina, for some reason or o<strong>the</strong>r, probably as amedium <strong>of</strong> tribute, <strong>the</strong> citizens were temporarilyallowed to revive <strong>the</strong>ir traditional type <strong>of</strong> didrachmissue, with <strong>the</strong> addition, however, on <strong>the</strong> reverse, <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Brettian crab as <strong>the</strong> badge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir dependentposition.As this coinage seems to have followed almostimmediately on <strong>the</strong> short-lived issue <strong>of</strong> " pegasi," it wasno doubt owing to <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se that <strong>the</strong>monogrammatic "E was taken over on <strong>the</strong> obverse.But in if, agreement with Dr. Kegling, we place <strong>the</strong>issue <strong>of</strong> this type in or about 356 B.C. we are againbrought face to face with an obvious difficulty. Apartfrom <strong>the</strong> monogram <strong>and</strong> symbol, <strong>the</strong> types that it presentsso closely resemble those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coin [PI. IV. 21],which can hardly have been struck, at <strong>the</strong> lowest estimate,later than 370 B.C., that <strong>the</strong> considerable discrepancyin date seems hardly explicable.Yet <strong>the</strong> explanation is, after all, quite simple. <strong>The</strong>" Brettian"type in question does not, in fact, representa new die, but simply <strong>the</strong> alteration <strong>of</strong> an old one.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!