03.07.2016 Views

Authorized Authorized

eERqs

eERqs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OVERVIEW<br />

21<br />

Figure O.15 Labor shares of national<br />

income are falling in many countries,<br />

including some developing countries<br />

Trends in labor shares in output since 1975<br />

percentage points every 10 years<br />

Poland<br />

Mexico<br />

Hungary<br />

Estonia<br />

Bahrain<br />

Slovenia<br />

Lithuania<br />

South Africa<br />

Norway<br />

Luxembourg<br />

Micronesia, Fed. Sts.<br />

Namibia<br />

Latvia<br />

New Zealand<br />

China<br />

Finland<br />

Tunisia<br />

Argentina<br />

Slovak Republic<br />

Germany<br />

Austria<br />

Sweden<br />

France<br />

Italy<br />

Australia<br />

Taiwan, China<br />

Canada<br />

Japan<br />

Denmark<br />

Switzerland<br />

United States<br />

Netherlands<br />

Belgium<br />

Czech Republic<br />

Spain<br />

Singapore<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Portugal<br />

Bolivia<br />

Turkey<br />

Armenia<br />

Colombia<br />

Kenya<br />

Thailand<br />

Costa Rica<br />

Iceland<br />

Belarus<br />

Moldova<br />

Korea, Rep.<br />

Ukraine<br />

Brazil<br />

–15 –10 –5 0 5 10<br />

Change in labor shares<br />

in national income<br />

Source: Karabarbounis and Neiman 2013. Data at http://bit.do<br />

/WDR2016-FigO_15.<br />

Figure O.16 Falling labor shares in national income<br />

are associated with rising inequality<br />

Change in Gini coefficient vs. growth in labor share in national income, 1995–2010<br />

Change in the Gini coefficient in<br />

consumption or income (%)<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

–5<br />

–10<br />

–15<br />

CHN<br />

LVA<br />

BGR<br />

EST<br />

CRI<br />

–20<br />

–30 –25 –20 –15 –10 –5 0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Change in the share of national output going to labor (%)<br />

Source: Eden and Gaggl 2015, for the WDR 2016. Data at http://bit.do/WDR2016-FigO_16.<br />

FIN<br />

GBR<br />

ITA<br />

NOR<br />

ESP HND<br />

GRC<br />

ARG<br />

PAN<br />

TUN<br />

increased more where this shift in incomes toward<br />

capital and away from labor has been higher (figure<br />

O.16). A number of recent studies have linked technological<br />

change to this rising inequality (see chapter 2<br />

in the full Report).<br />

A related trend is the polarization—or “hollowing<br />

out”—of the labor market, not only in advanced<br />

economies, but increasingly also in many developing<br />

countries. The share of employment in high-skilled<br />

occupations is up, as is the share of low-skilled jobs.<br />

The share of middle-skilled employment, in contrast,<br />

is down in most developing countries for which<br />

detailed data are available (figure O.17). And these<br />

types of jobs are often near the top of the income<br />

distribution in low-income countries, as in Africa.<br />

A notable exception to these global trends is China,<br />

where growing mechanization in agriculture has led<br />

to a (perhaps temporary) increase in routine, midlevel<br />

labor. Exceptions also include some countries<br />

rich in natural resources and commodity exporters,<br />

which include several countries in Central Asia and<br />

Latin America.<br />

What explains all this? Machines can increasingly<br />

perform routine tasks more quickly and cheaply than<br />

humans, and much of what is considered nonroutine<br />

today—such as translation, insurance underwriting,<br />

or even medical diagnostics—computers might do<br />

just as well tomorrow. Unlike previous technological<br />

transformations such as the mechanization of<br />

DNK<br />

IRL<br />

PRY<br />

BLR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!