I I - part - usaid

More documents

Recommendations

Info

B. ANALYTICAL METHCDOLOGY ANNEX 11-3 In ptcpaqng the design of this Pioject, the RTG and USAID adopted a mei.hodology that has provided more information, in a shor.er period of time, than has previously been available for most USAID ploject design work. Time from initial concepcua" 2ati :) ,Lf tambon-Levei ±nformation needs to complet *.' *i promcct paper was eight months, the last two to three -i. - c.Ch i.nvo!led the actual design. Pzimary sources of inforima,.ion we:e i; Recent studi es .f rainfed agriculture in the Noatheast, by MOAC (see section A, above); (2) Village-level sarveying by an anthropological team from Ramkhamhaeng University; (3) Hutsehod sveying by the Office of Agricultural Economics; and 4 Skte ",sLtat on and survey work by both a team of MOAC techniLcl specia.ists, and the Design Team of Thai and U.S. consultai.s. The components of the Information base fitted together in the fcilowing manne.- The Northeast rainfed agricultui studies tsee section A, above; were used tc provide much of the gene-.,& data about L..lfed faiming in the Northeast and to guide and rtame "he de-ign process Village-level surveyina by an dntniopolog!ca. team was used as a rapid and inexpensive means to pro,..de ; grear deal ot ;lnrormation about speci fic tardbons to be considered as potential project sitesE Usefulness of this type ,At su:'y.'ng Ls in site seiection and to provide a description of eacr s.te that would g2.ve the design team a great deal of needed ad-anced knowledge We found that this method p.t'vided accu'.ate infcrmation at the village level (born out by the rl.: te-c.nsuming me and expensive household surveying, and vas ar nvdauable ad to the Design Team, allowing them to be much be~tt;r inormed betQ),e they began to work and prior tL.the r own .:.tc,\±Sits. The report by technical specialists 1:6a, *,aaLi';, de-<strong>part</strong>ments of the MOAC on their observa.onal s'urvey ,I NERAD sites was also used t provide much of the genera). .:foimiton about the primary needs for agticultutai deveiopment, probl.ms -i, recommendations fo:. each <strong>part</strong>icul.ar tamovn. FLom this Ln ,uational base, the design team then cc.nducted s.te vjs~ts dnd gathered further on-the-ground necesbary i. to the actual plannng, in addition to nc,lin[tacn irom conversations wi.th RTG officials from vari..ouz agen, es and intormation provided by them. While all this was occ..rtg.L, the Ofrice of Agricultural Economics had surveyed the b:.es at Lhe household Level arid household data wri cc:To, , ,.- a'.a ummar desc.Ipt.ve results prepared with the a.La u! cicpute Litre , 'U S. RAMC in BangkDk-, usxriu 5r.S . ua su.t'%ey werc.available a, the design tcufi pfepa6red tQ write up the design and the statitsics provided w.re u.ed thoughA.the projec' paper Further [V. r- p~-~J r~p
ANNEX 11-4 computer analysis, beyond summary description, was also requested by the design team and provided by RAMC with USAID staff technical. assistance. The data from this household survey is considexed some of the best, most recent household data available on the Northeast and w.il undergo further analysis for USAID and RTG programmatic concerns, and wil.i serve as baseline data for the Project.
Page 1 and 2:
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL DEVELOP
Page 3 and 4:
Title V Technical Feasibility Analy
Page 5 and 6:
HH = Household IBRD = International
Page 7 and 8:
I. Design Team vi Project Design Cr
Page 9 and 10:
NEROA, MOAC (1981) vii-, Village Le
Page 11 and 12:
THAILAND UNITED STATES INTERNATIONA
Page 13 and 14:
I hereby: d. Waivers xi i: Based up
Page 15 and 16:
1. Addendum to Project Paper A. Org
Page 17 and 18:
B. Farming Systems and Demonstratio
Page 19 and 20:
PART I - RECOMMENDATiGNS, SUMMARY.
Page 21 and 22:
a , itTechnicat ATpep roa it-is n,,
Page 23 and 24:
stoif timne on thoS- aeas,. This co
Page 25 and 26:
-7 tCurt etn-iHic n Tha-s 'L.v.ng
Page 27 and 28:
- 9 - UNiFAO is supporting an an-gs
Page 29 and 30:
pro3ects primarily--roads, 6arry±n
Page 31 and 32:
- 13 plant protection inputs. A
Page 33 and 34:
- 15 b. Utilization of landform
Page 35 and 36:
- 17 - FIGUI
Page 37 and 38:
- 19 Proje-,t to tully utilize e
Page 39 and 40:
- 21 a reduction of specoal "pro
Page 41 and 42:
- 23 may also be necessary in 2o
Page 43 and 44:
- 25 tambons will tend to reduce
Page 45 and 46:
- 27 trials and extension trials
Page 47 and 48:
- 29 system in its implementatio
Page 49 and 50:
- 31 (31 Econom:c Development of
Page 51 and 52:
- 33 based on their technical fe
Page 53 and 54:
- 35 - The Project will develop an
Page 55 and 56:
- 37 fo maintenance, utilities,
Page 57 and 58:
- 39 - PART III - PROJECT ANALYSES
Page 59 and 60:
- 41 farmgate p:ices are the bes
Page 61 and 62:
- 43 crops will alr.-zst dob.,e
Page 63 and 64:
44 provide mo,'e t ta,:tie returns,
Page 65 and 66:
- 47 - Proposed ctopping system. mo
Page 67 and 68:
- 49 - Detailed planning during the
Page 69 and 70:
-51 could be easily identified as
Page 71 and 72:
- 53 - TEA's fco the 8 PRo~ect tamb
Page 73 and 74:
- 55 d. SeediSt.ack. Farmers c.t
Page 75 and 76: - 57 0, Emphasis on increased pr
Page 77 and 78: - 59 - It should be noted that unde
Page 79 and 80: - 61 - FIGURE I.t.-Cr - i r',, ; 7
Page 81 and 82: - 63 (2, Embankment StLUctUre (D
Page 83 and 84: * . *... !,A MV. M4I7 vT S 7 k (CTU
Page 85 and 86: - 67 - D. Financial Plan and Arrang
Page 87 and 88: C. Revised Budget -69- NI,'4AD l" 1
Page 89 and 90: c. Revised Budget A,~ GI ,('.t 1. T
Page 91 and 92: Total cost toi ±oan-financed procu
Page 93 and 94: -74 A e. Disbursement Procedures.
Page 95 and 96: a- Ndtional Level - 76 The .rgon
Page 97 and 98: d. D.striCt Level - 78 - The fiel
Page 99 and 100: Coimnitte(e os' N61t!,east 1L.i ifL
Page 101 and 102: - 82 2. Procedural Arrangements
Page 103 and 104: - 84 .Oterest rind capab..it es
Page 105 and 106: - 86 3. Second and Succeeding Ye
Page 107 and 108: Int iaat onor, t n. c uri-ent im'g
Page 109 and 110: C. Evaluation P1n and MontorinjArra
Page 111 and 112: - 92 feet inqs--orie oI LWO 'ha
Page 113 and 114: 2. Loan Agreement - 94 a. initia
Page 115 and 116: i-v Addenda to Annexes NERAD ANNEXE
Page 117 and 118: -ii - Ill. GUIDELlNES FUR LONU IERM
Page 119 and 120: TRAINING -iv- The long-term truinin
Page 121 and 122: AC'rloN USAID-5 AMn c -mE I-A •~-
Page 123 and 124: UN CLkSSFIED IOWEVER, THERE "I'S UN
Page 125: ANNEX 11-2 suggestions for rained a
Page 129 and 130: 4 4 4 E j .'pr.'%:>4'e4'." :t e re.
Page 131 and 132: ANNEX IV-3 the, fooding season and
Page 133 and 134: FIGURE 3 ANNEX'5 IV-5 RECONAISSANCE
Page 135 and 136: iFIfGURE5 RZECONNKJSSANC SOI MAP OF
Page 137 and 138: 2. Roi Et Province ANNEX IV-9 This
Page 139 and 140: FXIGURE RCONNAS81M SQL Iv*A CF TAM
Page 141 and 142: FIGURE 1U ANNEX IV-13 AZCONNAISSANC
Page 143 and 144: 3. Nakhon Phal)om Province ANNEX IV
Page 145 and 146: ANNEX IV-17. ;UE--l3,RECONNAISSANCE
Page 147 and 148: RECONNAISSANCE SOIL MAP OF TAMBON N
Page 149 and 150: 4. Si Sa Ket province ANNEX IV-21 T
Page 151 and 152: FIGURE 18 ANNEX IV-23 am Kam I I I'
Page 153 and 154: L.'£ UtL 20 - Soil and Land Ceapab
Page 155 and 156: . . I• , .... , '+ If' S2.Key to
Page 157 and 158: (Nearest) District-Level Rainfall D
Page 159 and 160: 5. Tambon-Level Data Summary ANNEX
Page 161 and 162: Figure 23 a Tambon Level Data Summa
Page 163 and 164: ANNEX IV-35 Province Si Sa Ket Nakh
Page 165 and 166: ANNEX V V. Technical FeasLbility An
Page 167 and 168: ANNEX V-3 with droughl.-toLecrnt cr
Page 169 and 170: ANNEX V-5 'echihiques 'ich have bee
Page 171 and 172: HIGH TERRCACE Figure V-I Land Form
Page 173 and 174: Figure V-3 Estimated Area-/(rai) Pl
Page 175 and 176: Estimates of Incremental Economic C
Page 177 and 178:
Social Soundness Analysis See Analy
Page 179 and 180:
A. Terehical. Ass.starice Budget DE
Page 181 and 182:
t Travel international 2$1,350 2 Tr
Page 183 and 184:
Salaries Descriptions B. Administra
Page 185 and 186:
Administration and Technical Suppor
Page 187 and 188:
1 Expendable supplies Descriptions
Page 189 and 190:
Vehicle Administration and Technica
Page 191 and 192:
Act1.vIty /4.2 Graduate Assistatnt
Page 193 and 194:
D. Other Far:ming System Improvemen
Page 195 and 196:
Description Facmer Specialist Train
Page 197 and 198:
*POL - IC Pick-up Truck (25 litre/d
Page 199 and 200:
3. Compost Demonstration Compost Su
Page 201 and 202:
":. " " LA r i . i . . I ..l "'x1..
Page 203 and 204:
l 2.4 .2.1 2.4.2.1 2.4.2.3 2.4.2.4
Page 205 and 206:
G. Other Agricultural Support - Res
Page 207 and 208:
1. Demonstration and Research Budge
Page 209:
Evaluation Mini Evaluations (4 stud
Page 212 and 213:
ANNEX X-. t0. FA Sue. 620(o): isher
Page 214 and 215:
fl- t tivLona~od ;I lIuci.tI;tL dei
Page 216 and 217:
. FAA Sec. 62011. WL.I security t;i
Page 218 and 219:
S +. 6. 7. . mt. 8i= " 8. • ANNEX
Page 220 and 221:
production and tle use ANNEX X-11 r
Page 222 and 223:
ANNL. x-13 " provide ait Least 25%
Page 224 and 225:
* 1 . * . A. . ~1. " ...... ; , ':'
Page 226 and 227:
T- C l;* ,I R II ' IONS C. '---R-ES
Page 228:
No. AC 0205/.3,, No. AC 2O5'3 Mr. D
show all

I I - part - usaid

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?