I I - part - usaid
I I - part - usaid
I I - part - usaid
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
- 42 -<br />
Glutinous r.ce is typically prcduced for home consumption;<br />
rtat ptoduced for the market is ordinarily nonglutinous<br />
since the market price of the latter is generally<br />
higher than the former and yields and production cost of<br />
local varieties aie roughly the same. There is a very<br />
limited exp..rt market for glutinous rice; very little is<br />
exported and none imported, Furthermore, the domestic<br />
elasti~cty :fi scLbstftution between glutinous and non-glutinous<br />
is repoited to be very lcw. Consequently glutinous rice is<br />
praced at its dcmes-ic farmgate pr..ce° Also, since the<br />
prcductn growth trend is zero for glutinous rice and all<br />
growth :.n -.utput has been due tc growth in output of nonglutinous,<br />
-t is assumed that all the increase in paddy<br />
production due to the Project is non-glutinous.<br />
The econcmic price for paddy was derived by taking<br />
the average fc., export price $355 or 07,280/MT) and<br />
working bac< to the rarmgate, (excluding all taxes) to<br />
obtain the value added between farmgate and port. Based on<br />
prices that farmers were actually receiving in February<br />
1981, the paddy prices used (see annex for prices used),<br />
both eccnomic and financial, are very conservative. The<br />
remaining prices are estimates of farmgate prices and are<br />
realistic- The net return to househcld labor and land for<br />
vegetable production could be substantially higher than the<br />
approximately P900/ra: used. It could also be substantially<br />
lower, We believe the net returns used for vegetab.e/truck<br />
crops .;s as realistic an estimate as is possible.<br />
It was assumed that per xa: crop yields would be<br />
constant without the Project, HistorAcal data show yields<br />
generally being flat or drifting downward.<br />
3. Farm Budget<br />
Farm budgets without and with the Project are<br />
shown in the Annex Over 85% of the cropped area was in<br />
rice in 1979,80- With the Project, th..s will be reduced<br />
some bu. rice uiil ccnt..nue to be by fax the dominant crop.<br />
The area planted to mung beans and other similar short.<br />
duration crops ,. pro-ected to increase substantally in<br />
both absolute and relative terms and over the longer run.<br />
The cropped area in mung beans 7s pro-ected to bc about<br />
equal to cassava. This would reflect a conrlnuat, mn of a<br />
national trend., -,.e the area in mung becns has been consistentiy<br />
gzowing a- a relativeLy rapid pace over the past<br />
decade or so. The projected a:"ea unde: vegetables/truck