I I - part - usaid
I I - part - usaid
I I - part - usaid
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
- 39 -<br />
PART III - PROJECT ANALYSES SUMMARIES<br />
A. Economic Analysis Summary<br />
1. Economic and Financial Returns<br />
The overall economic internal rate of return for<br />
the project is estimated at 18%, ranging from a high of 19%<br />
for cropping systems, to a low cf 17% for the other farming<br />
systems component (see Figure III-A-I below). The IRR is<br />
relatively insensitive to changes in 11roject and household<br />
input costs but moderately sensitive to changes in output<br />
yield. Thus a 20% increase in Project costs reduces the<br />
overall IRR from 18 to 16%. The corresponding figures for a<br />
20% increase in <strong>part</strong>icipating household costs, including<br />
investment costs, and a 20% reduction in output yield are<br />
16% and 12% respectively. Since the yield estimates used in<br />
the analysis are conservative, such a yield decrease is<br />
unlikely.<br />
Figure III-A-I - IRR, Sensitivity Analysis and Financial<br />
Returns to Participating Households<br />
Project<br />
Component<br />
Cropping Systems<br />
Water Resources<br />
Other Systems<br />
Combined<br />
*Discounted at 14%.<br />
ECONOMIC INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN<br />
Basic<br />
19<br />
18<br />
17<br />
18<br />
20% Benefit<br />
20% increase Decrease Cost<br />
In Input Costs In Output Ratio to<br />
Project Farm/HH Yield Farmers*<br />
18<br />
16<br />
14<br />
17<br />
16<br />
14<br />
16 16<br />
12<br />
12<br />
10<br />
2.1<br />
2.4<br />
1.9:1<br />
12 2.1:1<br />
Figure ILL-A-i also indicates that the 1:oject should<br />
be attractive to iacmers: tb financial benefit-cost ratio<br />
to <strong>part</strong>icipating farmers is estimated at 2.1:1 for the overall<br />
Project. (See Annex V1-2 for benefit-cost streams.)