08.12.2012 Views

Scientific Concept of the National Cohort (status ... - Nationale Kohorte

Scientific Concept of the National Cohort (status ... - Nationale Kohorte

Scientific Concept of the National Cohort (status ... - Nationale Kohorte

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A.3<br />

A.3 Study design<br />

<strong>the</strong> possible depth <strong>of</strong> examination. The arbitrary requirement to examine one subject in a<br />

40-min examination time imposes a limitation on <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> information that can be acquired.<br />

Longer MRI examination times <strong>of</strong> 60–70 min, for example, which are well tolerated<br />

by study subjects according to <strong>the</strong> experience at <strong>the</strong> SHIP site, will make it possible to additionally<br />

cover <strong>the</strong> research interests <strong>of</strong> most groups. Such a program would not only result<br />

in good comparability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Cohort</strong> data with o<strong>the</strong>r major studies in <strong>the</strong> field, but<br />

also provide extra and innovative options that have not been addressed in any o<strong>the</strong>r study.<br />

We expect a final decision on this issue in early 2011.<br />

A fur<strong>the</strong>r alternative is under evaluation: Instead <strong>of</strong> implementing four stationary MRI centers,<br />

vendors are asked to calculate costs for mobile MRI centers, ei<strong>the</strong>r as a truck-based<br />

or a container-based solution. The advantage <strong>of</strong> mobile centers would be that MRI could<br />

be performed at more than four study centers. However, costs would have to fit into <strong>the</strong><br />

financial budget.<br />

MRI follow-up examination<br />

Protocol: After performing baseline MRI examinations over a period <strong>of</strong> 5 years, follow-up<br />

MRI examinations will be conducted in all subjects willing to participate. The follow-up scans<br />

will similarly be performed over a period <strong>of</strong> 5 years. Identical technical equipment, technologist<br />

staff, and a similar imaging protocol will be applied to ensure highest internal validity.<br />

Thus, no adjustments will be made to <strong>the</strong> protocol detailed in <strong>the</strong> paragraph Proposed MRI<br />

Imaging Protocol.<br />

Also, <strong>the</strong>re will be no update <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tware or hardware.<br />

follow-up rate: Based on experience <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SHIP study and <strong>the</strong> Framingham Heart Study,<br />

we anticipate that approximately 50% <strong>of</strong> subjects scanned at baseline will receive a repeat<br />

MRI examination.<br />

workflow: The study center will maintain all contact with <strong>the</strong> participants. Subjects will<br />

be informed that a repeat MRI exam is scheduled after a follow-up period <strong>of</strong> 5 years (±2<br />

months) when consent is obtained for <strong>the</strong> baseline scan. All subjects who were scanned at<br />

baseline will receive a written invitation for <strong>the</strong> repeat exam which specifically highlights <strong>the</strong><br />

importance and value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow-up examination. They are invited to individually schedule<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir examination. A follow-up phone call will be made to ensure that <strong>the</strong> participant received<br />

<strong>the</strong> written invitation.<br />

An approximate follow-up response <strong>of</strong> 50% would imply that, in an average study center<br />

with 20,000 participants, an imaging site would have an overcapacity with respect to <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> study subjects who accept to be examined. In addition, if only 20% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> more<br />

intensively characterized participants are <strong>of</strong>fered MRI examinations, this would result in a<br />

total <strong>of</strong> only 3,000 participants (50% <strong>of</strong> 6,000 participants). Thus, an additional proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately 30–50% <strong>of</strong> participants in <strong>the</strong> Level 1 examination program can be <strong>of</strong>fered to<br />

take part in <strong>the</strong> MRI subproject.<br />

Data transfer and archive<br />

To ensure data safety and availability <strong>of</strong> all images for <strong>the</strong> centralized first-line reading in <strong>the</strong><br />

centralized reading core, all acquired data will be stored two-fold: (1) All data will be sent<br />

to <strong>the</strong> reading core at <strong>the</strong> competence center on imaging to perform <strong>the</strong> first-line reading;<br />

and, (2) as detailed in Sect. A.4.2, all images will be long-term archived at (at least) one <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> two national Integration Centers for <strong>the</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Cohort</strong>. The preferred way <strong>of</strong> organizing<br />

<strong>the</strong> data transfer is to send <strong>the</strong> images from <strong>the</strong> imaging site to <strong>the</strong> integration centers,<br />

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!