Scientific Concept of the National Cohort (status ... - Nationale Kohorte
Scientific Concept of the National Cohort (status ... - Nationale Kohorte
Scientific Concept of the National Cohort (status ... - Nationale Kohorte
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A.5<br />
A.5 Methods for quality assurance and quality control<br />
procedures, if required; <strong>the</strong> local quality manager is responsible for accomplishing such<br />
measures .<br />
Monitoring procedures at <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central quality <strong>of</strong>fice: The central quality <strong>of</strong>fice<br />
will coordinate <strong>the</strong> monitoring procedures. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> monitoring results <strong>of</strong> all study<br />
centers will be analyzed for entire study population sample and for stratified subsamples<br />
(e.g., by study centers, gender, season, age, and examination). The central quality <strong>of</strong>fice<br />
will prepare quality reports in cooperation with <strong>the</strong> competence units, which are evaluated<br />
by external quality management. Subsequently, <strong>the</strong> central quality <strong>of</strong>fice will refer <strong>the</strong> comments<br />
and instructions given by <strong>the</strong> external quality management to <strong>the</strong> competence units,<br />
who may propose new guidelines. Quality reports will be generated upon completion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
feasibility and pilot studies. For <strong>the</strong> main study, overall quality reports will be prepared biannually.<br />
In addition, interim quality reports will be prepared at shorter time intervals (weekly<br />
or monthly), depending on <strong>the</strong> specific assessment in question.<br />
A.5.3 Standardization <strong>of</strong> sampling methods and assurance <strong>of</strong> high participation<br />
The representativeness and number <strong>of</strong> study participants will be assessed in each study<br />
center by comparing <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population sample with <strong>the</strong> general population<br />
in <strong>the</strong> recruitment area according to age, sex, and o<strong>the</strong>r demographic variables. Instructions<br />
for subject recruitment will be checked for completeness and plausibility with respect to <strong>the</strong><br />
population to be recruited. All contact procedures described in <strong>the</strong> study protocol with respect<br />
to <strong>the</strong> contact letters and sequence and timing <strong>of</strong> contacts will be monitored. For this<br />
monitoring a uniform electronic appointment system will be used. An initial letter, at least<br />
one postal reminder, and subsequent phone calls are foreseen for recruiting subjects into<br />
<strong>the</strong> cohort as described in Sect. A.3.1.4.<br />
A short nonresponder questionnaire soliciting basic demographic data will be employed<br />
to detect possible selection biases at an early stage. As part <strong>of</strong> quality control, <strong>the</strong> study<br />
centers will thus assess <strong>the</strong> reasons for nonresponse or drop-out; <strong>the</strong> number, content, and<br />
contact time <strong>of</strong> successful and unsuccessful contact attempts; and documentation and correct<br />
classification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reasons for nonparticipation and verification <strong>of</strong> quality-neutral dropouts.<br />
The collected information is examined both locally and by <strong>the</strong> central quality <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />
As soon as deviations from anticipated response rates are detected, specific counteractive<br />
measures will be taken (e.g., target population-specific measures). It is also important to<br />
ensure that subjects willing to participate are included in <strong>the</strong> cohort and can be convinced to<br />
participate in future follow-up. Means to increase response rates will be applied and documented<br />
to measure positive (or negative) effects on response rates. Measures <strong>of</strong> cohort<br />
retention to be applied include:<br />
� Incentives<br />
� Sending information flyers and brochures<br />
� Sending general or preliminary study results<br />
� Updating addresses at postal <strong>of</strong>fices or residential registries or by phone call<br />
� Providing subjects <strong>the</strong> opportunity for indicating a change <strong>of</strong> address (free postal<br />
card, email account, or password-protected website)<br />
158