Journal Thoracic Oncology
WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1
WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Abstracts <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017<br />
OA04: EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PREVENTION OF LUNG CANCER<br />
MONDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2016 - 11:00-12:30<br />
OA04.03 PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A LOW COST INTERVENTION<br />
TO IMPROVE TOBACCO CESSATION PRACTICES WITHIN A LARGE<br />
UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM<br />
Mary Kay Hamby 1 , Allison Nix 2 , Julie Tobi 2 , Kelly Rysso 2 , Douglas Arenberg 3<br />
1 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor/MI/United States of America, 2 University of<br />
Michigan, Ann Arbor/United States of America, 3 Internal Medicine, University of<br />
Michigan, Ann Arbor/MI/United States of America<br />
Background: Tobacco cessation is critical for both population and individual<br />
health, and especially so in the context of a lung cancer screening program.<br />
Our institution initiated formal lung caner screening in 2013. In preparation<br />
for this we audited randomly selected clinic visits to assess adherence to<br />
published tobacco cessation guidelines. Our findings in that study prompted<br />
us to initiate a systematic multi-step program to improve tobacco practices<br />
from assessing tobacco use to presribing pharmacotherapy, and referral to<br />
tobacco cessation counselors. Methods: The project included four separate<br />
but related interventions; 1) Inviting clinic directors to send a clinic staff<br />
member of their choice for formal training in a specialize Tobacco treatment<br />
Specialist (TTS) course. 2) Generating monthly reports showng completeless of<br />
tobacco history (Current/Former/Never), pack-years recording, and (for former<br />
smokers) quit dates, use of pharmacotherapy for current smokers, and referrals<br />
for either tobacco cessation or formal lung cancer screening. 3) Providing<br />
monthly feedback to clinic directors comparing their performance to others<br />
in the project, and 4) Initiation of an electronic Best Practice Alert prompt for<br />
smokers including links to a Lung Cancer Screening Questionaire & decision aid<br />
and referral to Tobacco Counselor. Results: This University Health System is<br />
affiliated with over 150 satellite clinical sites. 20 sites delivering mostly adult<br />
primary care were invited to participate. Individuals from 14 sites completed<br />
TTS training. Initial assessment of tobacco use (Current/Former/Never) was<br />
excellent (>99%) across all clinical sites, including those who did not particpate<br />
in TTS training. However, pack-years were recorded on average less that 40%<br />
of the time and quit dates for former smokers were recorded less than 30% of<br />
the time at baseline. After training clinic staff in the TTS course, and regular<br />
ongoing feedback to clinical directors, we observed a significant initial increase<br />
in accurate recording of pack-years and quit dates (two points of emphasis) for<br />
all sites involved in the project, as well as referals to tobacco counselling. Over<br />
this time, unfortunately we did not detect an increase in the rate of prescription<br />
of tobacco pharmacotherapy. The There was a gradual increase in the the<br />
number of referrals for lung cancer screening Cts increased from an average of<br />
30 per month to an average of over 70. Conclusion: This project to disseminate<br />
the skills of a TTS training course to clinics within a large University Health<br />
System has led to modest improvements in overall practices and demonstrated<br />
areas where additional improvements are needed.<br />
Keywords: tobacco cessation, quality improvement, screening<br />
OA04: EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PREVENTION OF LUNG CANCER<br />
MONDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2016 - 11:00-12:30<br />
OA04.05 CHRONIC INFLAMMATION, NSAIDS AND THE RISK OF<br />
LUNG CANCER DEATH<br />
Marisa Bittoni 1 , David Carbone 2 , Randall Harris 3<br />
1 The Ohio State University, Columbus/United States of America, 2 Medical <strong>Oncology</strong>,<br />
The Ohio State University, Columbus/OH/United States of America, 3 The Ohio State<br />
Unversity, Columbus/OH/United States of America<br />
This abstract is under embargo until December 5, 2016 at 07:00 CET.<br />
OA04: EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PREVENTION OF LUNG CANCER<br />
MONDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2016 - 11:00-12:30<br />
OA04.06 EXAMINING PLEIOTROPIC ASSOCIATIONS OF GENETIC<br />
RISK VARIANTS FOR CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY<br />
DISEASE WITH LUNG CANCER RISK<br />
Lori Sakoda 1 , Khanh Thai 1 , Nareg Roubinian 2 , Carlos Iribarren 1 , Catherine<br />
Schaefer 1 , Neil Risch 3 , Laurel Habel 1 , Charles Quesenberry Jr. 1 , Eric Jorgenson 1<br />
1 Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland/CA/United<br />
States of America, 2 Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Critical Care, Kaiser<br />
Permanente Northern California, Oakland/CA/United States of America, 3 Institute<br />
for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco/CA/<br />
United States of America<br />
Background: Tobacco smoke is the primary cause of chronic obstructive<br />
pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer, and among smokers, COPD is<br />
associated with increased lung cancer risk. However, fewer than 30% of<br />
smokers are diagnosed with either disease, suggesting that genetic factors also<br />
influence the pathogenesis of both diseases. Despite the plausibility for shared<br />
genetic predisposition, knowledge about pleiotropy between COPD and lung<br />
cancer is limited. Methods: Using the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult<br />
Health and Aging cohort established at Kaiser Permanente Northern California<br />
(KPNC), an integrated healthcare system, we examined non-Hispanic white<br />
smokers aged ≥40 years diagnosed with lung cancer (n=489), including those<br />
with COPD (n=243) or without COPD (n=174), and neither disease (n=26,553)<br />
through January 31, 2014. Those with lung cancer were identified from KPNC<br />
Cancer Registry data. Those with COPD were identified from electronic health<br />
record data, requiring at least one hospitalization with a principal discharge<br />
diagnosis or two outpatient visits with a diagnosis of chronic bronchitis,<br />
emphysema, or COPD (ICD-9 codes: 491.*, 492.*, 496.*). We examined 16<br />
single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 10 risk loci identified previously<br />
for COPD or airflow obstruction by genome-wide association studies (1q41,<br />
4q22.1, 4q31.21, 5q32, 6p21.32, 11q22, 14q32, 15q25.1, 16p11.2, 19q13) for their<br />
associations with lung cancer risk, overall and stratified by COPD. SNPs were<br />
examined individually and also jointly as an unweighted 16-SNP risk score.<br />
Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using<br />
logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, pack-years of smoking, and principal<br />
components of genetic ancestry. Results: Only two SNPs at 15q25.1, a risk locus<br />
also known for lung cancer and nicotine dependence, were associated with<br />
overall lung cancer risk: rs8034191 (per-allele OR=1.22, 95% CI: 1.07-1.39, p=0.003)<br />
and rs12914385 (per-allele OR=1.23; 95% CI: 1.08-1.40, p=0.002). In stratified<br />
analyses, associations were marginally stronger for lung cancer without COPD<br />
(rs8034191: OR=1.36, 95% CI: 1.09-1.69; rs12914385: OR=1.24, 95% CI: 1.00-1.54)<br />
than lung cancer with COPD (rs8034191: OR=1.09, 95% CI: 0.90-1.31; rs12914385:<br />
OR=1.17, 95% CI: 0.97-1.40). The 16-SNP risk score was suggestively associated<br />
with overall lung cancer risk (highest vs. lowest quintile: OR=1.31, 95% CI: 0.97-<br />
1.76), with the magnitude of association somewhat stronger for lung cancer<br />
with COPD (OR=1.28, 95% CI: 0.84-1.97) than without COPD (OR=1.16, 95%<br />
CI: 0.72-1.88). Conclusion: Our preliminary results provide minimal evidence<br />
of pleiotropic associations of identified genetic variants for COPD with lung<br />
cancer risk, although analyses are limited by the number of lung cancer patients<br />
examined.<br />
Keywords: lung cancer, pleiotropy, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease<br />
OA04: EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PREVENTION OF LUNG CANCER<br />
MONDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2016 - 11:00-12:30<br />
OA04.07 CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA<br />
IN THE YOUNG: RESULTS FROM THE GENOMICS OF YOUNG LUNG<br />
CANCER STUDY<br />
Barbara Gitlitz 1 , Anna Wu 1 , Marisa Bittoni 2 , Bonnie Addario 3 , Alicia Sable-<br />
Hunt 4 , Mark Jennings 1 , Silvia Novello 5 , Tiziana Vavala 6 , Ruthia Chen 7 , Deborah<br />
Morosini 8 , Geoffrey Oxnard 7 , S. Lani Park 1<br />
1 University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles/CA/United<br />
States of America, 2 Ohio State University, Columbus/OH/United States of America,<br />
3 Bonnie J. Addario Lung Cancer Foundation, San Carlos/United States of America,<br />
4 Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute, San Carlos/United States of America,<br />
5 Department of <strong>Oncology</strong>, University of Turin, Turin/Italy, 6 University of Turin,<br />
Turin/Italy, 7 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston/MA/United States of America,<br />
8 Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge/MA/United States of America<br />
Background: Background: Lung cancer is increasingly recognized as a<br />
heterogeneous disease comprised of genomically defined subtypes with<br />
distinct targetable genomic alterations. However, it is unknown whether<br />
established lung cancer risk factors differ between these genomically<br />
distinct subtypes. In this study of the genomics of young lung cancer<br />
(GoYLC), we present preliminary results of lifestyle risk factors by specific<br />
genomic alteration to better characterize lung cancer in the young. Methods:<br />
Methods: Beginning in July of 2014, patients diagnosed with a bronchogenic<br />
lung cancer under the age of 40 were recruited to the GoYLC study. Informed<br />
consent was obtained in-person and virtually (online), allowing patients to<br />
participate globally, regardless of proximity to study sites (https://www.<br />
openmednet.org/site/alcmi-goyl). To date, this study has accrued a total of<br />
101 cases, of which 85 are adenocarcinoma (AC). Stage 4 AC is the focus of this<br />
analysis. Results: Results: Among the 63 stage 4 AC cases, the most common<br />
genomic alterations were ALK rearrangements (n=28; 44% of stage 4 AC<br />
cases) and EGFR mutations (n=17; 27%) while the other genomic alterations<br />
(n=18; 29%) include ROS1, BRCA2, HER2, P53, RET and ATM. The prevalence<br />
of active smoking and/or exposure to passive smoking was highest among<br />
those with ALK (64%), intermediate for those with EGFR (47%) and lowest<br />
for those with other genomic alterations (39%). However, the prevalence of<br />
only active smoking was lowest among those with ALK (28%), followed by<br />
EGFR (35%) and highest for those with other genomic alterations (39%). The<br />
majority of patients with ALK rearrangements or EGFR mutations reported no<br />
family history of lung cancer (82% and 88%, respectively), compared with 67%<br />
among those with other genomic alterations. Conclusion: Conclusion: These<br />
preliminary results suggest that lifestyle characteristics and family history in<br />
young lung cancer patients may differ by genomic alteration. Passive smoke<br />
exposure was more prevalent among those with ALK rearrangements or EGFR<br />
S132 <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017