02.12.2016 Views

Journal Thoracic Oncology

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Abstracts <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017<br />

anticipated to increase during the first half of this century. Chemotherapy is<br />

the mainstay of treatment, yet sufficiently robust evidence to substantiate<br />

the current standard of care has emerged only in the past 5 years. Methods:<br />

A retrospective cohort study of 100 MPM patients referred to NCI, Cairo<br />

University in 3 years. Detailed data, Pearson’s Chi (x2) square and Logistic<br />

regression model were used for statistical analysis. Results: We found a<br />

statistical significant relation between age ( 0.005), male gender (0.002),<br />

endemic area residence( 0.001), industrial workers ( 0.018), duration of<br />

exposure (0.04), smokers (0.009), Simian virus ( 0.019), P53 ( 0.001), RbP<br />

(0.001), PS ( 0.0.16) and development of high grade toxicity of platinum based<br />

chemotherapy.<br />

Median age = 46 years, only 17% of cases developed high grade toxicity<br />

complications of platinum based chemotherapy. Males were 59% of cases.<br />

PS, residence, smoking, occupation, history of asbestos exposure, family<br />

history, simian virus, P53, Rbp, dyspnea, chest pain, cough, expectoration,<br />

haemoptysis, weight loss, fatigue, metastatic symptoms, chronic lung<br />

infection, Tuberculous pleuritic, effusion, pleural thickening, Tracheal shift,<br />

TNM staging, surgical operations, pathological staging, radiotherapy ,cause<br />

of death and chemotherapy toxicity are assessed in our patients. Conclusion:<br />

Many factors predict high grade chemotherapy toxicity. So, search for target<br />

therapy and immunotherapy instead of chemotherapy in this selected group<br />

can improve both quality of life and response rate.<br />

POSTER SESSION 1 - P1.01: EPIDEMIOLOGY, TOBACCO CONTROL AND CESSATION/<br />

PREVENTION<br />

PROGNOSTIC FACTORS, TREATMENT –<br />

MONDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2016<br />

higher ECOG values. Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2013, all<br />

patients diagnosed with a pathology of SCLC and NSCLC at National Institute<br />

of <strong>Oncology</strong> at Paraguay were analyzed retrospectively. ECOG performance<br />

status were recorded and SPSS 20 was used to analyze with logistic Binary<br />

regression Results: We studied 478 subjects. At age mean 60,40 [95% CI 59,45<br />

to 61,34 ] years and ECOG performance status mean 2,13 [95% CI 2,06 to 2,20]<br />

points. Bivariate correlations show no relation with age, gender, living place,<br />

work, smoking, alcohol consumption, histopathology of lung cancer only with<br />

motive of consultation and clinical severity. In our model of predicting a ECOG<br />

3 to 5 adding first motive of consultation show a Nagelkerke R2: 0.14, Hosmer<br />

y Lemeshow P: 0.95. Adding to the model clinical severity Nagelkerke R2: 0.07<br />

Hosmer y Lemeshow P: 1.0. Variables in our predicting model show at clinical<br />

severity IIB stage OR:6,62 [95% CI 1,13 to 38,52 P=0.035], clinical severity IIIA<br />

stage OR: 3.85 [95% CI 1,18 to 12.51 P=0.025],clinical severity IIIB stage OR:4,49<br />

[95% CI 1,87 to 10,78 P=0.001]. At limited-stage SCLC clinical severity OR: 10,12<br />

[95% CI 1,88 to 54,34 P=0.007]. At first motive of consultation chest paint OR:<br />

3,13 [95% CI 1,38 to 7,11 P=0.006]. Cough OR: 2,30 [95% CI 1,11 to 4,76 P=0.024].<br />

Palpable Tumoral mass OR: 8,35 [95% CI 1,65 to 42,07 P=0.010]. Conclusion:<br />

Regardless our expectations about relation of disability of patient with lung<br />

cancer about place of living, work, gender, age this variables show no relation<br />

with ECOG at 3 to 5. In Our review we found a prediction model with clinical<br />

severity adding 7% to prognostic of limited self-care and by adding to the<br />

model first motive of consultation a 14% of prognostic of worst ECOG status.<br />

If first consultation motive is chest pain, cough or palpable tumoral mass,<br />

this are strongly related with worst ECOG values. As a conclusion most of our<br />

patients are diagnostic in advance clinical stages with a bad performance<br />

status which will limited our options to treatment. All of these can be related<br />

with a late consultation or a late detection of the disease.<br />

Keywords: Lung neoplasm, quality of life, Neoplasm Staging<br />

P1.01-050 OVERALL SURVIVAL IN ADVANCED LUNG CANCER<br />

PATIENTS TREATED AT ONCOSALUD-AUNA<br />

Alfredo Aguilar 1 , Claudio Flores 2 , Luis Mas 1 , José María Gutierrez 1 , Luis<br />

Pinillos 3 , Carlos Vallejos 1<br />

1 Department of Medical <strong>Oncology</strong>, Oncosalud - Auna, Lima/Peru, 2 Dirección<br />

Científica Y Académica, Oncosalud - Auna, Lima/Peru, 3 Radioncología - Auna, Lima/<br />

Peru<br />

Background: Lung cancer still remains as the principal death cause in many<br />

regions around the world. Unfortunate, between 60-70% of patients are<br />

diagnosed with advanced disease (clinical stage IIIB-IV). We report the overall<br />

survival of advanced lung cancer in patients treated at a private institution<br />

(Oncosalud – AUNA). Methods: We analyzed data of 75 patients with<br />

advanced lung cancer and treated at Oncosalud-AUNA between 2013-2014.<br />

Overall survival was determinate using Kaplan-Meier method and survival<br />

curves comparison were performed using logrank test. Results: The median<br />

age was 70 years (range: 39-91) and 49% of patients were women. In patients<br />

with clinical stage IV, the metastatic sites were generally brain (28%),<br />

osseous (18%), cervical and supraclavicular (14%). The 66.7% of patients<br />

received chemotherapy with/without radiotherapy, 9% radiotherapy only<br />

and 24% non-treatment. In patients previously treated with chemotherapy,<br />

52% received targeted therapy. The 77% of patients hab died, the follow-up<br />

median of survivors was 23 months (CI95%: 17-29), survival median was 9.6<br />

months (CI95%. 5.6-13.5) and 1 and 2 years survival rate were 38% and 23%,<br />

respectively. The survival rate at 1 and 2 years in those receiving targeted<br />

therapy ware 65% and 43%, and those who did not receive were 35% and 10%.<br />

The overall survival present a difference regarding to ECOG scale (p = 0.015)<br />

and CYFRA 21.2 (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Overall survival for our patients is<br />

similar to other series. Patients under ECOG scale

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!