02.12.2016 Views

Journal Thoracic Oncology

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Abstracts <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017<br />

ORAL ABSTRACT SESSIONS - TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2016<br />

SESSION OA09: LOCALLY ADVANCED NSCLC:<br />

INNOVATIVE TREATMENT STRATEGIES<br />

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2016 - 11:00-12:30<br />

OA09.01 THE NUMBER OR THE POSITION IS THE MAIN PROGNOSTIC<br />

FACTOR FOR N2 NSCLC? A VALIDATION OF NEW IASLC N STAGING<br />

PROPOSAL<br />

Sara Ricciardi, Pietro Bertoglio, Marco Lucchi, Vittorio Aprile, Carmelina<br />

Zirafa, Alfredo Mussi<br />

Department of Surgical Medical Molecular Pathology and Critical Care, Divison of<br />

<strong>Thoracic</strong> Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa/Italy<br />

Background: The eighth edition of lung TNM does not change any N descriptors,<br />

but it suggests some potential changes that might be used in the next edition.<br />

In fact, N2 would be divided into three groups: pN2a1 (skip lymph-node<br />

involvement), pN2a2 (single mediastinal station with hilar involvement)<br />

and pN2b (multiple mediastinal involvement). The aim of this study was to<br />

verify the value of this classification proposal analyzing our recent surgical<br />

experience. Methods: We retrospectively selected all patients treated with<br />

lobectomy, bilobectomy or pneumonectomy for T1/T2 N2 NSCLC (VII TNM<br />

edition) in the period between 2006 and 2010. We excluded all patients who<br />

underwent any kind of extended resection and who had another active tumor<br />

at the time of operation. A systematic lymph-node dissection was always<br />

carried out according to the IASLC guidelines. All patients were then restaged<br />

according to the new IASLC proposal. Overall Survival (OS), Disease Free<br />

Interval (DFI) and most important variables were analyzed. Results: Among 248<br />

surgically treated pN2 patients, 108 entered our inclusion criteria. Pathology<br />

report showed a majority of T2 tumors (67,6%) and in almost half of cases an<br />

adenocarcinoma (50,9%); a mean number of 16,4 (DS 7,8) lymph-nodes were<br />

resected (5,8 (DS 2,9) from the hilum and 10,6 (DS 5,9) from the mediastinum).<br />

After restaging all cases with the new IASLC proposal we observed: 30 (27,8%)<br />

pN2a1; 57 (52,8%) pN2a2 and 21 (19,4%) pN2b. With a median follow up of<br />

93 months, the median overall survival of the entire cohort was 27 months.<br />

pN2a1 had a significant better overall survival compared with the other two<br />

groups (p=0,020); conversely no statistically significant difference was found<br />

in OS between pN2a2 and pN2b. 1, 3 and 5-year survival for pN2a1, pN2a2<br />

and pN2b were 90%, 81% and 71%; 53%, 37% and 24%; 45%, 26% and 19%<br />

respectively. Concurrently DFI was significantly better for pN2a1 (p=0,025). At<br />

univariate survival analysis age>65 years, more than 4 positive lymph nodes<br />

and postoperative complications were statistically significant variables. At the<br />

multivariate analysis only age and the number of positive lymphnodes were<br />

independent prognostic factors of a worse survival. Conclusion: Our experience<br />

partially validate the new proposal of IASLC of N2 staging. Patients with skip<br />

lymph-node metastasis (pN2a1) have a statistically significant better prognosis.<br />

Concurrently we observed and confirmed the important prognostic value of the<br />

number of the involved lymph-node, which should be considered as well in the<br />

next editions of the lung cancer staging system.<br />

Keywords: n2 lung cancer, staging system, skip metastasis, NSCLC<br />

OA09: LOCALLY ADVANCED NSCLC: INNOVATIVE TREATMENT STRATEGIES<br />

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2016 - 11:00-12:30<br />

OA09.02 SHOULD SURGERY BE PART OF THE MULTIMODALITY<br />

TREATMENT FOR STAGE IIIB NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER<br />

Stephane Collaud 1 , Bastien Provost 1 , Dominique Fabre 1 , Sacha Mussot 1 ,<br />

Benjamin Besse 2 , Olaf Mercier 1 , Elie Fadel 1<br />

1 Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis Robinson/France, 2 Department of Cancer<br />

Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif/France<br />

Background: Stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous<br />

patient group, including T4N2 and T1-4N3 NSCLC. Traditionally, treatment<br />

for stage IIIB consists in definitive chemoradiation. Surgical treatment<br />

for stage IIIB NSCLC is used anecdotally in highly selected patients. Here,<br />

we studied patient outcome who underwent surgical resection as part of<br />

multimodality treatment for stage IIIB NSCLC. Methods: All patients from a<br />

single institution who underwent surgery for stage IIIB between 2000 and<br />

2015 were included. Surgical candidates were selected on a case-by-case<br />

basis during multidisciplinary tumorboard conference. In general, N2-N3<br />

diseases are not considered an absolute contraindication to surgery if<br />

lymph node involvement is limited to a non-bulky single site, the tumor is<br />

deemed completely resectable without major morbidity and the patient will<br />

tolerate multimodality treatment. Mediastinal staging comprised cervical<br />

mediastinoscopy, positron emission tomography coupled with CT from 2005<br />

and endobronchial ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration from 2011. Charts<br />

were retrospectively reviewed and data analyzed. Survival was calculated<br />

from the date of surgery until last follow-up. Univariate and multivariate<br />

analysis were performed to identify prognostic factors. Results: From 2000<br />

to 2015, 5416 patients underwent lung resection for NSCLC in our center. Sixty<br />

patients (1%) underwent surgery for stage IIIB NSCLC. Forty-three were males<br />

(72%). Median age was 58 years (from 22 to 79). Thirty-two patients had T4N2<br />

NSCLC involving the carina (n=16, 50%), superior vena cava (n=4, 12%), carina<br />

and superior vena cava (n=5, 16%), left atrium (n=5, 16%), pulmonary artery<br />

(n=1, 3%) and spine (n=1, 3%). Twenty-eight patients had N3-disease, involving<br />

supraclavicular (n=14, 50%) or contralateral mediastinal lymph nodes (n=14,<br />

50%). Pneumonectomy was performed in 27 patients (45%). Twenty-nine<br />

patients (48%) had induction therapy, consisting in chemotherapy alone for<br />

all patients. Adjuvant therapy was administered to 52 patients (87%) and<br />

consisted mostly of chemoradiation (n=35, 67%). Complete resection (R0) was<br />

performed in 55 patients (92%). Post-operative mortality was 3% (n=2). Threeand<br />

5-year overall survivals were 51% and 39%, respectively. Median survival<br />

was 40 months. Median follow-up was 17 months. Results of the multivariate<br />

analysis identified incomplete resection (p=0.008) and absence of adjuvant<br />

treatment (p=0.032) as prognostic factors for poor survival. Conclusion: An<br />

excellent 5-year survival of 39% was achieved in highly selected patients with<br />

stage IIIB NSCLC and treated with multimodality including surgery. Patients<br />

with stage IIIB NSCLC should therefore be discussed in a multidisciplinary<br />

setting, including thoracic surgeons.<br />

Keywords: stage IIIB, NSCLC, Surgery<br />

OA09: LOCALLY ADVANCED NSCLC: INNOVATIVE TREATMENT STRATEGIES<br />

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2016 - 11:00-12:30<br />

OA09.03 RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY COMPARING<br />

ADJUVANT VERSUS NEO-ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN<br />

RESECTABLE STAGE IB TO IIIA NSCLC<br />

Xue-Ning Yang 1 , Wen-Zhao Zhong 1 , Xiao-Song Ben 2 , Hong-He Luo 3 , Changli<br />

Wang 4 , Qun Wang 5 , Guibin Qiao 6 , Hong-Hong Yan 1 , Yi Long Wu 1<br />

1 Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of<br />

Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong General Hospital & Guangdong<br />

Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou/China, 2 Department of <strong>Thoracic</strong> Surgery,<br />

Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of<br />

Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong General Hospital & Guangdong<br />

Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou/China, 3 Department of <strong>Thoracic</strong><br />

Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital; Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou/China,<br />

4 Department of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong>, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute &<br />

Hospital, Tianjin/China, 5 Department of <strong>Thoracic</strong> Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital,<br />

Shanghai/China, 6 Department of <strong>Thoracic</strong> Surgery, General Hospital of Guangzhou<br />

Military Command of P.L.A, Guangzhou/China<br />

Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for completely<br />

resected stage II-IIIa non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A few trials suggest<br />

that neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a promising strategy for resectable NSCLC.<br />

Indirect comparison meta-analysis of adjuvant versus neoadjuvant therapy<br />

showed no difference in survival. This study was conducted to determine the<br />

difference of disease-free survival(DFS) between adjuvant chemotherapy and<br />

neoadjuvant chemotherapy among patients with resectable NSCLC. Methods:<br />

Patients with clinical stage IB-IIIA NSCLC were eligible. Patients were randomly<br />

assigned to 3 cycles adjuvant DC (Docetaxel: 75mg/m2, Carboplatin:AUC=5 on<br />

day 1, every 3wk) after completely resection (lobectomy or pneomonectomy<br />

with mediastinal lymphnode dissection, or 3 cycles neoadjuvant DC at the<br />

same schedule followed by surgery 3-6 wk after chemotherapy. The primary<br />

end point was 3 years DFS; secondary end points were 3ys and 5ys Overall<br />

Survival(OS) and Safety. Planned sample size is 410. The trail was early closed<br />

because slowly accrued. Results: Between March 2006 and May 2011,198<br />

patients from 8 Institute were randomized to neoadjuvant arm (97 cases) or<br />

adjuvant arm (101 cases). The median age was 58, male accounted for 80.3%,<br />

Adenocarcinoma 48.5%, stage Ib, II a, II b and IIIa were 32.5%, 12.2%, 28.4% and<br />

26.9% respectively. Two arms were balanced. 100% cases received neoadjuvant<br />

chemotherapy and 87.4% finished the planned adjuvant chemotherapy. No<br />

unexpected toxicities were seen and 41.2% of patients experienced grade 3-4<br />

neutropenia. In neoadjuvant arm, the ORR was 34% and 12.4% patients<br />

developed PD. No difference in postoperative complication was found<br />

between two arms. Survival analysis show in Table 1<br />

Copyright © 2016 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer<br />

S141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!